24SevenOffice is a modular, all-in-one enterprise resource planning (ERP) system with integrated capabilities such as customer relationship management (CRM), financial and project management, and communication.
N/A
Projector PSA
Score 7.0 out of 10
N/A
Projector's cloud-based Professional Services Automation (PSA) software helps project-based services organizations track time and expenses, invoice clients, schedule resources, and manage projects. Its three modules span a more comprehensive set of uses than typical project management software. The Accounting module helps the user track time and expenses and manage invoices and billing. Also it syncs with the company's accounting systems as a sub-ledger. The Resource Scheduling module matches…
We selected 24SevenOffice because the vendor made a lot of promises and demos related to network uptime and features. None of this ended up being exactly correct in real life. I have never used any other PM software so I can't really speak to how it compares in a lot of those …
24SevenOffice has its own pros and cons just like any other software. It is a great software for an organization to do project management or financial management. It stacks up very competitively against others and is probably in the top 3. the UI that is offered by this …
Projector PSA is a great option for entering time. Our employees have no issue allocating their time to the correct tasks types. Projector PSA does not require a written description for time, and our employees have noticed that this makes for a cleaner, straightforward entry. …
Projector PSA provided a better value and much smaller initial commitment. The implementation process required minimal professional services. Projector PSA also had a strong data security model to limit visibility appropriately to personnel using the system.
Projector had the most features that best aligned with our usage. We liked the scheduling and reporting features.
Verified User
Anonymous
Chose Projector PSA
During our assessment of alternate systems we examined the functionality of: ASTEA, Technology One, SAP, Microsoft Project Server, and SalesForce.com. Offerings were assessed against the following evaluation criteria: system functionality, application integration, …
Verified User
Anonymous
Chose Projector PSA
We did pursue Quick Arrow another tool that was similar. We found that be in inflexible in use. Projector allows a lot of flexibility in setup. Our organization has very specific business processes and we were able to set up Projector to work with those processes. Several other …
Verified User
Anonymous
Chose Projector PSA
Primavera is an excellent product but much more sophisticated than what my department needed at the time I selected and recommended Projector PSA.
We switched to Projector from Open Air. While Open Air was a good tool, we found it wasn't really designed for project management at the level of detail we needed from our PSA and used MS Project and Excel to supplement Open Air. We also struggled with the invoicing side of it, …
Features
24SevenOffice
Projector PSA
Payroll Management
Comparison of Payroll Management features of Product A and Product B
24SevenOffice
7.1
Ratings
1% below category average
Projector PSA
-
Ratings
Pay calculation
6.70 Ratings
00 Ratings
Benefit plan administration
7.60 Ratings
00 Ratings
Direct deposit files
5.10 Ratings
00 Ratings
Customization
Comparison of Customization features of Product A and Product B
24SevenOffice
7.9
Ratings
4% above category average
Projector PSA
-
Ratings
API for custom integration
9.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Plug-ins
6.70 Ratings
00 Ratings
Security
Comparison of Security features of Product A and Product B
24SevenOffice
7.0
Ratings
16% below category average
Projector PSA
-
Ratings
Single sign-on capability
6.70 Ratings
00 Ratings
Role-based user permissions
7.40 Ratings
00 Ratings
Reporting & Analytics
Comparison of Reporting & Analytics features of Product A and Product B
24SevenOffice
6.9
Ratings
5% below category average
Projector PSA
-
Ratings
Dashboards
6.70 Ratings
00 Ratings
Standard reports
8.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Custom reports
5.80 Ratings
00 Ratings
General Ledger and Configurable Accounting
Comparison of General Ledger and Configurable Accounting features of Product A and Product B
24SevenOffice
6.1
Ratings
23% below category average
Projector PSA
-
Ratings
Accounts payable
8.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Accounts receivable
6.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Global Financial Support
6.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Primary and Secondary Ledgers
7.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Journals and Reconciliations
6.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Configurable Accounting
6.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Standardized Processes
5.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Inventory Management
Comparison of Inventory Management features of Product A and Product B
24SevenOffice
6.8
Ratings
15% below category average
Projector PSA
-
Ratings
Inventory tracking
7.70 Ratings
00 Ratings
Automatic reordering
6.50 Ratings
00 Ratings
Location management
6.70 Ratings
00 Ratings
Order Management
Comparison of Order Management features of Product A and Product B
24SevenOffice
7.6
Ratings
3% below category average
Projector PSA
-
Ratings
Pricing
8.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Order entry
9.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Credit card processing
6.50 Ratings
00 Ratings
Cost of goods sold
8.10 Ratings
00 Ratings
Order Orchestration
6.80 Ratings
00 Ratings
Subledger and Financial Process
Comparison of Subledger and Financial Process features of Product A and Product B
24SevenOffice
7.0
Ratings
7% below category average
Projector PSA
-
Ratings
Billing Management
7.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Cash and Asset Management
7.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Travel & Expense Management
7.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Budgetary Control & Encumbrance Accounting
5.50 Ratings
00 Ratings
Period Close
6.70 Ratings
00 Ratings
Project Financial Management
Comparison of Project Financial Management features of Product A and Product B
24SevenOffice
7.1
Ratings
7% below category average
Projector PSA
-
Ratings
Budgeting and Forecasting
8.40 Ratings
00 Ratings
Project Costing
6.50 Ratings
00 Ratings
Cost Capture
8.60 Ratings
00 Ratings
Capital Project Management
6.10 Ratings
00 Ratings
Customer Contract Compliance
8.60 Ratings
00 Ratings
Project Revenue Recognition
8.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Project Execution Management
Comparison of Project Execution Management features of Product A and Product B
24SevenOffice
7.1
Ratings
3% above category average
Projector PSA
-
Ratings
Project Planning and Scheduling
8.30 Ratings
00 Ratings
Task Insight for Project Managers
7.40 Ratings
00 Ratings
Project Mobile Functionality
5.50 Ratings
00 Ratings
Definable Resource Pools
9.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Grants Management
Comparison of Grants Management features of Product A and Product B
24SevenOffice
7.1
Ratings
5% below category average
Projector PSA
-
Ratings
Award Lifecycle Management
8.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Procurement
Comparison of Procurement features of Product A and Product B
24SevenOffice
6.6
Ratings
5% below category average
Projector PSA
-
Ratings
Bids Analyzed and Compared
7.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Contract Authoring
7.40 Ratings
00 Ratings
Contract Repository
6.40 Ratings
00 Ratings
Requisitions-to-Purchase Orders Integrated
5.50 Ratings
00 Ratings
Supplier Management
4.80 Ratings
00 Ratings
Risk Management
Comparison of Risk Management features of Product A and Product B
24SevenOffice
6.7
Ratings
3% above category average
Projector PSA
-
Ratings
Risk Repository
7.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Control Management
8.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Control Efficiency Assessments
6.70 Ratings
00 Ratings
Issue Detection
7.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Remediation and Certification
4.80 Ratings
00 Ratings
Logistics
Comparison of Logistics features of Product A and Product B
24SevenOffice
6.8
Ratings
2% above category average
Projector PSA
-
Ratings
Transportation Planning and Optimization
7.40 Ratings
00 Ratings
Transportation Execution Management
7.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Trade and Customs Management
5.20 Ratings
00 Ratings
Fulfillment Management
5.20 Ratings
00 Ratings
Warehouse Workforce Management
5.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Manufacturing
Comparison of Manufacturing features of Product A and Product B
24SevenOffice
6.4
Ratings
15% below category average
Projector PSA
-
Ratings
Production Process Design
8.60 Ratings
00 Ratings
Production Management
7.70 Ratings
00 Ratings
Configuration Management
6.10 Ratings
00 Ratings
Work Execution
7.60 Ratings
00 Ratings
Manufacturing Costs
4.80 Ratings
00 Ratings
Supply Chain
Comparison of Supply Chain features of Product A and Product B
24SevenOffice
7.6
Ratings
7% above category average
Projector PSA
-
Ratings
Forecasting
8.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Inventory Planning
9.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Performance Monitoring
7.70 Ratings
00 Ratings
Product Lifecycle Management
Comparison of Product Lifecycle Management features of Product A and Product B
24SevenOffice
7.3
Ratings
2% above category average
Projector PSA
-
Ratings
Proposal Management
4.50 Ratings
00 Ratings
Product Master Data Management
8.60 Ratings
00 Ratings
Project Management
Comparison of Project Management features of Product A and Product B
24SevenOffice
-
Ratings
Projector PSA
7.4
Ratings
3% below category average
Task Management
00 Ratings
9.50 Ratings
Resource Management
00 Ratings
9.50 Ratings
Gantt Charts
00 Ratings
6.00 Ratings
Scheduling
00 Ratings
8.50 Ratings
Workflow Automation
00 Ratings
9.00 Ratings
Team Collaboration
00 Ratings
7.50 Ratings
Support for Agile Methodology
00 Ratings
5.80 Ratings
Support for Waterfall Methodology
00 Ratings
5.20 Ratings
Document Management
00 Ratings
8.50 Ratings
Email integration
00 Ratings
7.60 Ratings
Mobile Access
00 Ratings
3.70 Ratings
Timesheet Tracking
00 Ratings
9.50 Ratings
Change request and Case Management
00 Ratings
5.20 Ratings
Budget and Expense Management
00 Ratings
8.10 Ratings
Professional Services Automation
Comparison of Professional Services Automation features of Product A and Product B
It is very well suited for a mid-level organization that has limited data and that does not require very complex analysis by integration with other software and data analysis. It is also very good to have a holistic view of financial analysis, accounts payable, receivables, payroll management, and other financial areas. It would not be very suitable when it requires integration with other software and tools, this could be one area of improvement. It can have better API's.
We think Projector PSA is a great tool to track and manage people in a professional service environment like management consulting. This system is easy to set up, easy to understand and should easily suit the needs of smaller and medium sized firms. It may be less appropriate for firms that rely very heavily on project management through another system (like MS Project) or firms that rely very heavily on a sales pipeline tracking system. While still very much possible to use, you would (I believe) have to do some re-keying between systems
Time tracking. For a service company that typically bills retainers, it is very important to be able to assign a direct cost to your resources at all levels and analyze your profitability.
Expense reporting. Projector easily tracks expenses of all types and allows you to categorize them under non-billable projects, client billable projects and/or client development ventures.
Reporting. Projector has a large list of standard reports right at your fingertips. These reports can be extracted as Excel docs, mdp files and other useful formats. They are intuitive, clear and easy to analyze. For those you need on a standard basis, you can set them up to pull on a recurring basis. It should be noted that all reports are easily customized and Projector's support team is always there to help get you the information you need.
We have been using this tool for a year now and find our use of it continually evolves and broadens. We are also very excited about the overhaul that's under way and feel many of the improvements being put in place will help make us that much more effective and efficient. The Projector team is also very responsive and collaborative in terms of user feedback and improvement suggestions, which helps us know they will work hard to help us get what we need out of the tool.
Reduce 50% or more of your manual work through automation. Manage your business and staff with a comprehensive and fully integrated ERP, MRP, Manufacturing, Inventory management and AI-based accounting and bookkeeping system.staff with a comprehensive and fully integrated ERP, MRP, Manufacturing, Inventory management and AI-based accounting and bookkeeping system
We selected 24SevenOffice because the vendor made a lot of promises and demos related to network uptime and features. None of this ended up being exactly correct in real life. I have never used any other PM software so I can't really speak to how it compares in a lot of those ways.
We switched to Projector from Open Air. While Open Air was a good tool, we found it wasn't really designed for project management at the level of detail we needed from our PSA and used MS Project and Excel to supplement Open Air. We also struggled with the invoicing side of it, manually combining invoice summaries with custom time and expense reports in Acrobat. Projector however, was designed for project management. We are able to manage projects, track time and expenses, and invoice all out of one system. The project setup can accommodate a wide range of complexity, including milestones, dependencies, etc. Project and resource dashboards also help see the services portfolio and team at a summary level and allows us to zero in on particulars easily and more meaningfully than we were ever able to with Open Air. Invoice templates are also easily customized and we were able to get several set up quickly to meet our needs. Lastly, Open Air required us to purchase and pre-pay licensing for a year, so if we lost staff mid-way through the year, the unused seat was not prorated. Projector licensing is paid monthly based on actual number of active users that month, which makes more sense for a team with fluctuating headcount.
Even in the small time that I stayed to see Projector PSA reporting I saw ROI projections become more realistic. There was real data to analyze that proved we were spending way too much and charging way too less on some projects.
Although employees were not used at entering their hours, this single reporting improved operations management and validated employees concerns that more people were needed to manage workload
Project proposals were more realistic because they were driven by real data.
Decision making overall for the department became more efficient and effective