Abriska 31000 vs. BWise

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Abriska 31000
Score 0.0 out of 10
N/A
Abriska 31000 was designed to provide organisations with an intuitive tool for assessing and managing all types of risk from different functions and departments. Its purpose is to ensures that risk management is an integral part of management and governance, is embedded into the culture and practices, and is tailored to the needs of an organisation. Abriska can be used in any size and type of organisation, although it is ideally suited to those looking to embark on or mature its ERM…N/A
BWise
Score 7.5 out of 10
N/A
BWise is an Governance, Risk Management, and Compliance (GRC) platform formerly owned and supported by Nasdaq, acquired by SAI Global in April 2019.N/A
Pricing
Abriska 31000BWise
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Abriska 31000BWise
Free Trial
YesNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Abriska 31000BWise
Features
Abriska 31000BWise
Governance, Risk & Compliance
Comparison of Governance, Risk & Compliance features of Product A and Product B
Abriska 31000
-
Ratings
BWise
8.3
Ratings
10% above category average
Common repository of GRC items00 Ratings8.70 Ratings
Risk management00 Ratings8.10 Ratings
Integration with Corporate Performance Management (CPM) systems00 Ratings7.00 Ratings
GRC policy management00 Ratings8.70 Ratings
Incident management00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
User Ratings
Abriska 31000BWise
Likelihood to Recommend
-
(0 ratings)
8.1
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
-
(0 ratings)
9.0
(0 ratings)
Usability
-
(0 ratings)
9.0
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
-
(0 ratings)
9.0
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
-
(0 ratings)
8.0
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Abriska 31000BWise
Likelihood to Recommend
No answers on this topic
- What does our organization aim to achieve with the application? - Who will be using the tool? - How mature is our organization in the areas/processes that will fall in scope? - Are our areas averse to change? - How flexible and prone are our areas to modify their way of doing business and processes/procedures to accommodate BWise? - After implementation, who and how will perform application maintenance and change management (e.g. how easy will it be to update user privileges, central catalogs, assessment configurations, etc).
Read full review
Pros
No answers on this topic
  • Great reporting tool (uses SAP Business Objects). It is quite flexible on types of reports that can be created and supported. Also the reporting consultants are very competent and nice.
  • Highly customizable solution: almost everything can be tailored to an organization's needs, assessments, audits, issues, recommendations, tasks, etc. However, there's a trade-off between customization and the integration of different areas of the organization.
  • Increases visibility and efficiency in the organization. BWise offers centralized repositories (catalogs) that can be easily accessed and used by everyone in the organization (e.g. Process catalog, Policies and Procedures catalog, Risks, Controls, Laws catalogs, etc.). Also, the application allows findings on controls tested by Audit to be automatically reflected in controls monitored by SOX for example, without the need for SOX to retest them. So one area can leverage on the work of other areas increasing operational efficiency.
  • Increases integration and avoids silos. By choosing the correct design (e.g. Risk Workshops instead of Open Assessments), one area can see and benefit from another areas' work. An example was mentioned above; another would be Operational Risk area considering the results of Business Continuity, Vendor Management, Info Security, etc. assessments when carrying out theirs. Additionally, processes can be integrated: when contracting a new vendor for instance, one can include questions about data confidentiality and usage of models in the Vendor risk assessment. Answers to these could then trigger Info Sec / Model Risk assessments.
  • Increases accountability. Application provides full audit/change log with the type of change, name of executor, and date of change.
  • Easier follow-up. BWise sends automatic emails with reminders to the people required to take action on an issue, assessment, etc.
Read full review
Cons
No answers on this topic
  • Integration with SAP for continuous control monitoring.
  • Control mapping to standards: ISO; COSO; COBIT; HIPAA; SP800_53 (NIST); FedRAMP; PCI_DSS; BITS; GAAP; AICPA; BSI; CCM; COPPA; CSA
  • Surveys.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
No answers on this topic
BWIse is very flexible, and an affordable GRC tool.
Read full review
Usability
No answers on this topic
I found BWise to be very intuitive and user friendly.
Read full review
Support Rating
No answers on this topic
BWise support is knowledgeable and responsive. Bug fixes and development are also timely and ongoing.
Read full review
Implementation Rating
No answers on this topic
The main issues were managing the internal conflicts and competing objectives, rather than the capability and implementation of BWise itself.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
No answers on this topic
Wasn't personally involved in the vendor selection process. I am aware that one of the main drivers for selecting BWise was cost (I believe BWise total project cost was several times lower than MetricStream's).
Read full review
Return on Investment
No answers on this topic
  • Increased employee efficiency especially considering incident management and follow up.
  • Increased visibility and senior management information/awareness.
  • Increased employee accountability.
  • Reduction of silos.
Read full review
ScreenShots