accessiBe vs. Siteimprove

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
accessiBe
Score 10.0 out of 10
N/A
accessiBe is a fully automated, AI-powered, web accessibility solution for ADA and WCAG compliance.
$49
per month
Siteimprove
Score 10.0 out of 10
N/A
The Siteimprove platform offers tools used to create digital experiences optimized for quality, accessibility, analytics, and SEO. Sitemprove offers content insights and recommendations in a prioritized list to improve the impact of changes. It is available through three solution packages (Inclusivity, Content Experience, and Marketing Performance).N/A
Pricing
accessiBeSiteimprove
Editions & Modules
Standard
$49
per month
Large
$149
per month
Huge
$199
per month
Enterprise
custom pricing
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
accessiBeSiteimprove
Free Trial
YesYes
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
accessiBeSiteimprove
Considered Both Products
accessiBe
Chose accessiBe
We have not used any other ADA plugins. We did evaluate what was available from custom coding - which would have been far too expensive to WordPress plugins that were not fully supported. When you see what is available and weigh the pros/cons of other service providers there …
Chose accessiBe
AccessiBe seems to have a program of constantly improving and adding to its platform. They are one of the few providers that offer to provide litigation support if a client needs help from demand letters or complaints about sites not being compliant. They provide free website …
Chose accessiBe
We looked at getting an accessibility audit from various options, but I have not seen another product that does what accessiBe does.
Chose accessiBe
Media analysis was really important for us because we are an E-learning platform. Be able to feature flag it too.
Chose accessiBe
They all offer a very similar service but I needed great WordPress support, accessiBe excelled at that.
Chose accessiBe
After trying a few products, we have come to the conclusion that accessiBe has better automation and regular updates to improve the over site accessibility and compliance. No doubt, Siteimprove has turned out to be great, but its UI might not be as good as a non-technical user …
Chose accessiBe
I tried Userway, but it does not work well as accessiBe.
Userway only grants minor changes to design to the website and accommodates fewer disabilities.
Their changes are mostly for visuals and not structural to web accessibility.
Siteimprove
Chose Siteimprove
Siteimprove helps complement other SEO tracking tools by providing a different view of metrics and greater visibility into KPIs.
Chose Siteimprove
I prefer Siteimprove to all above for their easy to view and use dashboards. The visual aspect of SiteImprove makes it easy to pick up for everyone - as we have experienced in our team. We've only had 1 training session on it, as opposed to the multiple for the other things we …
Chose Siteimprove
The ability to take the raw data and put it into a user-friendly format.
Chose Siteimprove
Siteimprove provides richer features when it comes to how granular you can define policies and metrics for search engine optimization and content relevance. It is also much easier to set up and maintain the sites that you want to administer. However, pricing wise is more costly …
Chose Siteimprove
These tools allow you to make your site accessible without affecting its performance or design at all!
Chose Siteimprove
Compared to any other tool I've used, Siteimprove is the best. Many tasks that I used to do manually have become more accessible and faster due to it. The visual scanning of issues is what makes it the best. It's simple to find problems, fix them, and track how far we've come. …
Chose Siteimprove
I do like Siteimprove, but we are moving on to Monsido purely for costs. Monsido costs a third less than Siteimprove and offers the same functionality.
Chose Siteimprove
This was a replacement to IBM Policy Tester.
Chose Siteimprove
We have used or tested other tools that get installed on a computer or that are hosted online, but none of them offer the features that come with Siteimprove. TotalValidator Pro will check your site for accessibility issues, but it is a manual check and there is no historical …
Chose Siteimprove
In terms of WCAG, accessiBE is the more value oriented product with easy to understand results, less false positives, better WCAG results. That said, it's also a single focused tool, whereas Siteimprove is geared towards overarching web governance. There are simply no other …
Chose Siteimprove
Siteimprove is superior to Ahrefs due to it's clean and intuitive user interface and seamless navigation. Ahrefs contains a more robuts data set but the information is often difficult to locate and take action on because of how it's displayed to users. Siteimprove has less data …
Features
accessiBeSiteimprove
Web Analytics
Comparison of Web Analytics features of Product A and Product B
accessiBe
-
Ratings
Siteimprove
7.4
Ratings
8% below category average
Lead Conversion Tracking00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Bounce Rate Measurement00 Ratings7.00 Ratings
Device and Browser Reporting00 Ratings5.00 Ratings
Pageview Tracking00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Event Tracking00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Reporting in real-time00 Ratings4.00 Ratings
Referral Source Tracking00 Ratings7.00 Ratings
Customizable Dashboards00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
accessiBeSiteimprove
Small Businesses
BrowserStack
BrowserStack
Score 8.6 out of 10
StatCounter
StatCounter
Score 9.0 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Siteimprove
Siteimprove
Score 10.0 out of 10
Optimal
Optimal
Score 9.0 out of 10
Enterprises
BrowserStack
BrowserStack
Score 8.6 out of 10
Optimal
Optimal
Score 9.0 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
accessiBeSiteimprove
Likelihood to Recommend
9.6
(0 ratings)
10.0
(0 ratings)
Usability
-
(0 ratings)
10.0
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
9.1
(0 ratings)
9.3
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
accessiBeSiteimprove
Likelihood to Recommend
Using accessiBe is a no-brainer for any website. It stands head and shoulders above all other tools that would call themselves a competitor. It can be integrated into a website by anyone that has access to the website templates or can manage content in a CMS. The tool will do everything else automatically through the API. It is unobtrusive but super simple to use for the end-user. I can't think of a scenario in which accessiBe would not be appropriate for a website.
Read full review
Simple, easy-to-deploy accessibility that automatically scans, remediates and provides proof of compliance once the process is complete. It is ideal for people who want to make their website much more accessible and provide their users with an intuitive adjustable interface.
Read full review
Pros
  • Automate alt text image descriptions. Makes websites more accessible to people with visual disabilities. Makes websites more accessible to people with other physical disabilities. Enhances SEO possibilities for websites by implementing alt text for all images. Very user-friendly and plug-and-play for website admins.
Read full review
  • User-friendly customisable dashboards, easy to make a dashboard from a template, or create your own, and add in whichever 'widgets' are relevant for what you are looking at
  • Flagging words to review, allowing users to check and confirm if the word is 'accepted' or is a misspelling
Read full review
Cons
  • Adding a font changer especially for people with Dyslexia.
  • ability to gather Closed Captions or Read video transcripts.
  • ability to control videos from the user interface, some embedded videos do not have the option to pause or rewind video.
  • When viewing video not to be taken away from the site or offer alternatives that are not relevant to the site. Website owners often use embedded videos from YouTube which then offers other videos that are not related. AccessiBe should be able to play the embed link in a separate iframe which can auto-close once the video is over.
Read full review
  • I don't like that there are different navigation paths to go from point A to point B. When I want to navigate to a specific place, I have more than one way to get there, which means I have to make a decision about how I want to there and I'd rather the designer make that design based on what would be most efficient for me.
Read full review
Usability
No answers on this topic
Tool has undergone numerous changes, both to function and UX/CX. Makes it less than user friendly at times. But on the other hand, that does indicate a willingness to improve the product in a continual manner - which they've done nearly year after year - but it's always a case of who moved my cheese with each new iteration.
Read full review
Support Rating
I have called several times and my questions were always answered right away.
Read full review
I've used support often and it has been responsive, thorough and considerate of our needs. I can get a tech right away, they understand the issue, and work with us to resolve it. Often the problem is with the site we are trying to scan, sometimes it is with their product. I appreciate that they go beyond support into continually helping us implement SiteImprove in more places with 3rd party integration.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
AccessiBe seems to have a program of constantly improving and adding to its platform. They are one of the few providers that offer to provide litigation support if a client needs help from demand letters or complaints about sites not being compliant. They provide free website testing and you do not need an account or to be a client to have your site tested.
Read full review
Siteimprove provides richer features when it comes to how granular you can define policies and metrics for search engine optimization and content relevance. It is also much easier to set up and maintain the sites that you want to administer. However, pricing wise is more costly which can be a constraint for smaller organizations.
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • accessiBe had made our business good enough to boost the overall income because of people from different countries.
  • We haven't noticed any negative impact yet. However, we are trying to collect the data.
  • The overall sale of products has gone after using accessiBe.
Read full review
  • Siteimprove has helped bring our accessibility scores up from middling to near-perfect.
  • Siteimprove has helped reduce our broken links, style violations and misspellings.
  • Siteimprove's heatmaps have helped us make the case for enforcing best practices on the website among key stakeholders.
Read full review
ScreenShots

accessiBe Screenshots

Screenshot of accessiBe