ActiveCollab vs. Contractor Foreman

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
ActiveCollab
Score 7.6 out of 10
N/A
Active Collab is a project management solution built around features such as task management, collaboration, time tracking, and invoicing.
$8
per member/per month
Contractor Foreman
Score 6.9 out of 10
N/A
Contractor Foreman is an online construction management software for contractors and boasts users among contractors in more than 75 countries.
$588
per year
Pricing
ActiveCollabContractor Foreman
Editions & Modules
ActiveCollab Project Management
$8
per member/per month
Self-Hosted Plan
$999.00
license
Basic
$588
per year
Standard
$948
per year
Plus
$1,497
per year
Pro
$1,990
per year
Unlimited
$2,988
per year
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
ActiveCollabContractor Foreman
Free Trial
YesYes
Free/Freemium Version
YesNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup Fee$6.25 per member, per month, annual billingNo setup fee
Additional DetailsPlans are based on features and licenses needed. Plus, Pro, and Unlimited plans include a 100-day money back guarantee.
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
ActiveCollabContractor Foreman
Considered Both Products
ActiveCollab
Chose ActiveCollab
Unfortunately, I find that every single one of these alternatives is a better tool. ActiveCollab is a legacy tool my organisation had in place when I joined because their team had been much smaller and had less need for collaborative views and workload management within a tool …
Chose ActiveCollab
ActiveCollab has similar features to Basecamp for both project management and communication purposes. However, Basecamp has a better interface for organization of projects within clients and allows for linking to specific comments. However, ActiveCollab is more affordable than …
Chose ActiveCollab
ActiveCollab is easier to use and simpler in its setup. It has the right mix of features and simplicity. It's also project-oriented which is important for our workflow. Other tools are often too task-oriented, making it hard to track projects. Overall, ActiveCollab has a great …
Chose ActiveCollab
ActiveCollab has fewer functions than Wrike and a simpler interface, but generally, the team collaboration purpose is fulfilled.
Chose ActiveCollab
I have used multiple project management platforms such as ActiveCollab, Jira, Trello, etc. Trello has great visualization with their (Kanban Board) board system and support drag and drop functionality for managing tasks. ActiveCollab, however, does not have the fancy …
Chose ActiveCollab
ActiveCollab is 100% better than any of the other tools we have used. We had previously spent thousands of dollars trying out different software that was comparable, but this has been one of the best decisions we have made as a company. It's also the cheapest ongoing option, …
Chose ActiveCollab
Certainly, each of them has a particular advantage, which in the end makes it unique. ActiveCollab also belongs to a group of platforms created to be represented in particular, its way of project management is superior to Jira or Trello. With this software, the work is more …
Since we moved from fixed capacity project to T&M we need some tool who support our billing & invoicing.
HP ALM did not provide good support for invoicing so we moved out from HP ALM to ActiveCollab.
The features like Timer, reminders are not available in other project management …
Chose ActiveCollab
ActiveCollab has all the functions that are in these services, unlike them. Not everywhere there is a diagram of gantt. And somewhere the interface is very rewarded and in general looks obsolete.
Chose ActiveCollab
We chose Active Collab overall because we liked its easy to use user interface, project management suite and agency/vendor/client interaction capabilities. We also chose it primarily because it was offered as a web-based platform that offered very clean and easy mobile access …
Chose ActiveCollab
We chose Active Collab over Basecamp as the pricing model worked better for us. Basecamp, for us was a close second.
Contractor Foreman
Chose Contractor Foreman
Combines everything into one software. CRM, Estimating, Project Management, Job Costing all in one. We prefer to train people on one software rather than several. When everyone is using the same program it's easier for team collaboration. It also eliminates the excuse the I …
Chose Contractor Foreman
Monday.com was limited and I noticed myself integrating other programs rather than just using Monday.com I used Zoho at a sales company and it was fine for that. One of my friends uses Zoho for HVAC and I liked the Contractor Foreman interface better.
Chose Contractor Foreman
Based on the on my previous experience Contractor Foreman rates right along side the other cost saving systems I have used. It does not compare well to the higher end systems based on everything else that the more expensive systems can do. I think it is right in line with the …
Chose Contractor Foreman
D-tools has a nicer UI but is very specific to the CI industry. Since we moved into the solar business primarily it no longer met our needs.
Chose Contractor Foreman
Way easier to use and learn for new employees joining the business.
Chose Contractor Foreman
I used Projul and Buildium when I was primarily managing rental properties rather than full home builds. Projul was great for estimating and invoicing, while Buildium served its purpose well at the time. Now, as a small construction company, Contractor Foreman provides …
Chose Contractor Foreman
Had all of the pieces we were looking for in one place. Ease of use between mobile & desktop devices. Competitive price. Additionally, their responsiveness through email has been quick and accommodating. I love
Chose Contractor Foreman
Contractor Foreman offered the most services for the best price. Lots of the other software options I have looked into were missing features such as a mobile app or accounting integrations and some were extremely expensive wanting a percentage of overall revenue.
Chose Contractor Foreman
Contractor Foreman: Much more affordable, making it a better fit for small to mid-sized contractors.
Procore: High cost, often requiring enterprise-level budgets, making it overkill for our 33-person company.
Chose Contractor Foreman
It all comes down to the number of features that Contractor Foreman packs into their software for the price they charge. I think it stacks up against Procore but for a small fraction of the cost. They offer more features geared to the commercial GC then other software …
Chose Contractor Foreman
Contractor Foreman is committed to not only update their software consistently, but they also are committed to adding new features as their clients request them. If there is a feature that they do not have, there probably is a plan to implement it in the near future. Our …
Chose Contractor Foreman
There's just no comparing these two. I'm actually going to suggest we keep CE to my boss, and here's why: Clearestimates is perfect for what I just described. You have a little job that you just BOOM it's done? Put it into Clearestimates. That system does not care at all if you …
Chose Contractor Foreman
Buildertrend, Procore and CoConstruct
Chose Contractor Foreman
Contractor Foreman is much easier to use than the other softwares demo'd. Ultimately we got stuck while exploring other softwares and found them a bit difficult to navigate. Contractor Foreman was also available at a fraction of the cost. While the other big name competitors …
Chose Contractor Foreman
Contractor Foreman has Far better pricing.
Contractor Foreman also offered a pricing guarantee (i am not sure of that is still the case).
There are a few features that the top tier subscriptions of the others offer that Contractor Foreman is lacking: specifically a "selections" …
Chose Contractor Foreman
Pricing is the big one, they both offer similar products, Construction Foreman is affordable and Procore is outrageously expensive.
Chose Contractor Foreman
All of these programs are a good fit for somebody, but what we liked about Contractor Foreman is the ease of use and that they listen to the needs we have and work to add them or fix them. The program can look a little intimidating at first but once you get it setup the way you …
Features
ActiveCollabContractor Foreman
Project Management
Comparison of Project Management features of Product A and Product B
ActiveCollab
3.6
Ratings
72% below category average
Contractor Foreman
-
Ratings
Task Management5.10 Ratings00 Ratings
Resource Management1.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Gantt Charts3.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Scheduling1.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Workflow Automation7.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Team Collaboration6.10 Ratings00 Ratings
Support for Agile Methodology7.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Support for Waterfall Methodology7.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Document Management3.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Email integration4.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Mobile Access1.10 Ratings00 Ratings
Timesheet Tracking2.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Change request and Case Management1.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Budget and Expense Management2.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Professional Services Automation
Comparison of Professional Services Automation features of Product A and Product B
ActiveCollab
5.7
Ratings
28% below category average
Contractor Foreman
-
Ratings
Quotes/estimates6.90 Ratings00 Ratings
Invoicing6.90 Ratings00 Ratings
Project & financial reporting1.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Integration with accounting software7.90 Ratings00 Ratings
Human Resource Management
Comparison of Human Resource Management features of Product A and Product B
ActiveCollab
-
Ratings
Contractor Foreman
7.1
Ratings
7% below category average
Employee demographic data00 Ratings7.50 Ratings
Employment history00 Ratings5.50 Ratings
Job profiles and administration00 Ratings6.50 Ratings
Workflow for transfers, promotions, pay raises, etc.00 Ratings7.80 Ratings
Organizational charting00 Ratings7.30 Ratings
Organization and location management00 Ratings8.40 Ratings
Compliance data (COBRA, OSHA, etc.)00 Ratings6.50 Ratings
Payroll Management
Comparison of Payroll Management features of Product A and Product B
ActiveCollab
-
Ratings
Contractor Foreman
6.5
Ratings
16% below category average
Pay calculation00 Ratings6.10 Ratings
Support for external payroll vendors00 Ratings6.30 Ratings
Off-cycle/On-Demand payment00 Ratings4.50 Ratings
Benefit plan administration00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Direct deposit files00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Salary revision and increment management00 Ratings6.40 Ratings
Reimbursement management00 Ratings6.50 Ratings
Asset Management
Comparison of Asset Management features of Product A and Product B
ActiveCollab
-
Ratings
Contractor Foreman
7.5
Ratings
4% above category average
Tracking of all physical assets00 Ratings7.50 Ratings
Reporting & Analytics
Comparison of Reporting & Analytics features of Product A and Product B
ActiveCollab
-
Ratings
Contractor Foreman
6.6
Ratings
14% below category average
Dashboards00 Ratings6.70 Ratings
Standard reports00 Ratings6.60 Ratings
Custom reports00 Ratings6.60 Ratings
Data exportability00 Ratings6.60 Ratings
Construction Project & Field Management
Comparison of Construction Project & Field Management features of Product A and Product B
ActiveCollab
-
Ratings
Contractor Foreman
7.0
Ratings
8% below category average
Plan distribution & viewing00 Ratings6.90 Ratings
Plan markups & sharing00 Ratings6.50 Ratings
Issue tracking & punchlists00 Ratings6.80 Ratings
Photo documentation00 Ratings6.80 Ratings
Jobsite reports00 Ratings6.90 Ratings
Document sharing00 Ratings6.70 Ratings
RFI tools00 Ratings8.90 Ratings
Collaboration & approvals00 Ratings6.80 Ratings
Mobile app00 Ratings6.50 Ratings
Submittal design and management00 Ratings6.70 Ratings
Checklists00 Ratings6.80 Ratings
Meeting Minutes00 Ratings8.10 Ratings
Specifications00 Ratings7.40 Ratings
Change orders00 Ratings6.80 Ratings
Estimating
Comparison of Estimating features of Product A and Product B
ActiveCollab
-
Ratings
Contractor Foreman
6.9
Ratings
15% below category average
Takeoff tools00 Ratings7.50 Ratings
Job costing00 Ratings6.80 Ratings
Cost databases00 Ratings6.70 Ratings
Cost calculator00 Ratings6.70 Ratings
Bid creation00 Ratings6.70 Ratings
Best Alternatives
ActiveCollabContractor Foreman
Small Businesses
Stackby
Stackby
Score 9.0 out of 10
FollowUp CRM
FollowUp CRM
Score 10.0 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
InEight
InEight
Score 8.3 out of 10
InEight
InEight
Score 8.3 out of 10
Enterprises
InEight
InEight
Score 8.3 out of 10
InEight
InEight
Score 8.3 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
ActiveCollabContractor Foreman
Likelihood to Recommend
1.6
(0 ratings)
6.9
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
-
(0 ratings)
9.1
(0 ratings)
Usability
-
(0 ratings)
7.8
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
7.1
(0 ratings)
9.1
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
ActiveCollabContractor Foreman
Likelihood to Recommend
Active Collab is great for small teams who want a web-based project management platform to help them on their day-to-day workflow tasks, billing, estimations, vendor assignments and even client communications. It is also great for agencies with users who are sometimes remotely working. Active Collab starts to show shortcomings when you have an immense amount of projects in the system (1000+), and, being a web-based platform, can sometimes experience downtime.
Read full review
Contractor Foreman has been a great tool for managing a variety of projects, from home remodels to large-scale builds. It works especially well for keeping everything organized in one place, whether it’s estimates, schedules, or job costs.
One scenario where it’s been really useful is in managing multiple jobs at once. With several remodels and new construction projects happening at the same time, having a centralized system to track progress, store documents, and communicate with subcontractors has helped keep everything on schedule. It’s also great for estimating—being able to quickly generate and send professional proposals has made bidding much more efficient.
It’s especially well-suited for projects that require a lot of moving parts, like tracking permits and compliance documents. For larger jobs, like school construction, it helps ensure that all approvals, budgets, and schedules stay on track without getting lost in a mess of paperwork.
Where it’s less ideal is for smaller, one-off jobs where a full project management system might be overkill. If it’s just a quick repair or a simple remodel, sometimes it’s easier to just handle things manually. The mobile app could also be a bit more intuitive for on-site use, especially for field updates and quick changes.
Overall, it’s a strong tool for contractors managing multiple projects, budgets, and teams. It keeps things organized and saves time, especially on jobs that require detailed tracking and coordination.
Read full review
Pros
  • Project Management - Makes it very efficient to manage projects using Gantt Charts, daily email reports and custom reports!
  • Collaboration - Allows to collaborate with team members, tag them in tasks, send files/attachments.
  • Task delegation - With just 2 clicks you can delegate tasks to other team members/users.
Read full review
  • The service is top notch. You would be hard pressed to find other options with this kind of service.
  • The ability to have your project flow through the modules makes it a breeze to use.
  • Being able to track time as well is a key feature.
Read full review
Cons
  • It isn't possible to set members of staff as part time, so if someone is unavailable on certain days you must manually enter them as OOO every single day that they are not in, that other teammates work. Hours also can't be edited individually - everyone is treated as working the same hours in a day, rendering capacity planner useless for flexi working teams
  • Subtasks cannot be assigned their own hours and deadlines, meaning the To Do list view can't be seen in actual date order and capacity planner does not reflect all time allocated to an individual's schedule unless every task is set up as a separate task rather than subtask
  • There is no way to see all tasks of a certain type across multiple campaigns (e.g all copywriting tasks vs all technical tasks) - support team suggested exporting data and making spreadsheets
  • Kanban view isn't available for people's own task lists ('board' view here shows a list)
  • Not possible to have one task be assigned to more than one person
  • Notifications are not sent when tasks are updated, so you have to leave comments and tag people each time
Read full review
  • We already heard from CF that they might implement this, but a Gantt chart available while in the estimating tab, before you submit the project
  • If you don't do things juuuusssst so, sometimes the system doesn't update or rejects what you're doing. It can be picky.
  • You have to constantly refresh using their provided button. Fixes a lot of issues and becomes second nature, but a little annoying at first.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
No answers on this topic
Eliminated the need for our team to log into multiple systems to do their jobs which aligns to our Lean approach
Read full review
Usability
No answers on this topic
Mostly great, especially for the price. The features appear to have definitely been designed by a team with a depth of construction specific experience. I also highly rate the usability because of the vast vast amount of customizability inherent in the system. It appears that almost all forms and features are customabizable on the company level and even specific to different individual users.
Read full review
Reliability and Availability
No answers on this topic
Availability was good, FUNCTIONAL availability was more spotty
Read full review
Performance
No answers on this topic
Many times we had issues that turned out to be errors and bugs. At first, we would be told forcefully that there were no bugs, then we would document them, and we would get an acknowledgement but no apology for essentially either gaslighting us or being ignorant of their system
Read full review
Support Rating
The support team is responsive to requests and their annual support fees are reasonable. Honestly, we don't have to contact them much. Updates happen automatically and the platform is very solid and does not require a lot of support. Documentation is good and the platform is easy to learn.
Read full review
Absolutely top notch! They were always there to help and immediately. Very happy with the communication they provided and the knowledge they had of their product. I would venture to say that they are one of the best in terms of support in their space.
Read full review
Implementation Rating
No answers on this topic
Implementation was moderately difficult, it's the functionality and execution that are seriously lacking
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Since we moved from fixed capacity project to T&M we need some tool who support our billing & invoicing. HP ALM did not provide good support for invoicing so we moved out from HP ALM to ActiveCollab. The features like Timer, reminders are not available in other project management tools like JIRA, Rally & ALM making AC the first choice since we have strict SLA's & AC helps in meeting that.
Read full review
I used Projul and Buildium when I was primarily managing rental properties rather than full home builds. Projul was great for estimating and invoicing, while Buildium served its purpose well at the time. Now, as a small construction company, Contractor Foreman provides everything we need in one platform, making project management much more efficient.
Read full review
Scalability
No answers on this topic
We had just 2 users
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • A central communication portal is used to keep all members of the team informed as to the status of specific projects. All staff have access to read past discussions to enable contribution to the current discussion.
  • We have found it difficult to get our clients to adopt usage of ActiveCollab for communication on a reliable basis.
  • The cost per person is high when using it as a communication center.
Read full review
  • Cost Savings. Integration with QuickBooks and Bills improved financial control. 0-15% cost savings per project.
  • Time Savings: Streamlined project management led to a 20-30% reduction in administrative time, boosting on-site productivity, and with project tracking a 15-20% reduction in project delays.
  • Enhanced Collaboration: Centralized documentation and real-time updates improved team communication, increasing collaboration by 5-10%.
  • Overall, CF has provided a 10-15% return on investment annually through increased efficiency and cost control.
Read full review
ScreenShots

ActiveCollab Screenshots

Screenshot of the dashboard with an overview of projects.Screenshot of multiple task views currently showing a Kanban view of the tasklists and tasks.Screenshot of Overview of all recent activity.Screenshot of Calendar view with task dependencies.Screenshot of Permission settings (owner, member, client, client+).Screenshot of List of available Add-ons.

Contractor Foreman Screenshots

Screenshot of The client portal that lets customers to stay in the loop and know what is going on during all phases of the project.Screenshot of The custom dashboard which allows users to see the data that matters most to them.Screenshot of Stats that keep users informed to help them make use of data.Screenshot of The lead manager, that helps close deals without letting leads fall through the cracks.Screenshot of the Files & Photos screen, where making up plans can be done with Contractor Foreman.Screenshot of Time Cards, that display who is where and what they are doing.