ActiveBatch Workload Automation vs. Integrify

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
ActiveBatch Workload Automation
Score 7.5 out of 10
N/A
ActiveBatch from Advanced Systems Concepts in New Jersey is IT workload automation software.N/A
Integrify
Score 8.0 out of 10
Mid-Size Companies (51-1,000 employees)
Integrify provides low-code workflow management software for automating business processes and supporting digital transformation. Integrify also offers consulting and development services to help companies implement and expand their use of workflow automation.
$35
per month per user
Pricing
ActiveBatch Workload AutomationIntegrify
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
Integrify On-Premise
$35
per month per user
Integrify Cloud
$35
per month per user
Integrify Enhanced Cloud
$35
per month per user
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
ActiveBatch Workload AutomationIntegrify
Free Trial
YesYes
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeOptionalOptional
Additional DetailsPricing is based on the number of named or concurrent users.
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
ActiveBatch Workload AutomationIntegrify
Considered Both Products
ActiveBatch Workload Automation
Chose ActiveBatch Workload Automation
In our organization we need to schedule job quite frequently and it was difficult to manage as we were doing it manually, thanks to ActiveBatch Workload Automation this feature has been automated and no manual intervention is required, which has resulted in less errors.With the …
Chose ActiveBatch Workload Automation
ActiveBatch has improved the workload automation and job scheduling than ever before without a need of an external resource.
Chose ActiveBatch Workload Automation
The workload automation solution is based on the specific needs of an organization, as well as the features, capabilities, and costs of various solutions. A thorough evaluation process and consideration of these factors can help ensure the selection of a solution that aligns …
Chose ActiveBatch Workload Automation
It almost works everything good compares to other software, in terms of set up, in terms of cost, in terms of end number of options which is required for any organization you workuseful in planning your daily activities, providing the purchase order for raw materials, track the …
Chose ActiveBatch Workload Automation
A well-known and established workload automation system with a solid track record for scalability and dependability is Control-M. However, many users note that Control-M is more sophisticated and takes longer to develop than ActiveBatch, which is frequently commended for its …
Chose ActiveBatch Workload Automation
Users may manage and automate IT activities across many systems and applications using the complete task scheduling and automation platform known as ActiveBatch Workload Automation. It supports several different technologies, such as Windows, UNIX/Linux, Oracle, SAP, and many …
Chose ActiveBatch Workload Automation
I have used other products but I do not have the level of experience with them as I do Active Batch.
Chose ActiveBatch Workload Automation
I only have used this software, so I can't judge other software. I wasn't involved in decision making.
Chose ActiveBatch Workload Automation
We looked at several other workload automation solutions and hands down we all looked at each other after seeing the demo and we all understood the genius of the application. To be honest we were all stunned and talked about it for weeks afterward. It didn't even compare to the …
Chose ActiveBatch Workload Automation
I was not involved in the evaluation/purchase decision of ActiveBatch as that decision was made at our VP level. So I cannot comment on other product comparison.
Chose ActiveBatch Workload Automation
During initial selection, we compared ActiveBatch with simple schedulers like Task Manager and cron, as well as VisualCron and JAMS. ActiveBatch had the widest range of triggers and the best scheduler/calendar system, and the most comprehensive list of easily-available actions.

W…
Chose ActiveBatch Workload Automation
Control-M seems to be a more mature product with a cleaner user interface, however, ActiveBatch has the same functionality.
Chose ActiveBatch Workload Automation
N/A - It was already in place when I was on the scene, but like I said earlier it is much more powerful than SQL Server Agent and probably anything we would've come up with from scratch using .Net. However if your needs are small and traffic is light, then maybe SQL Server …
Integrify
Chose Integrify
When it comes to workflow, you want something reliable. Something that covers all the bases. You don't get that with a lot of platforms because they want to be the "heart of the <insert name here> industry." Integrify is like a little blob of playdough. It is its own creature, …
Chose Integrify
I think Integrify was a good product for its cost. The only thing it really lacked was project management capabilities. It was difficult for our manager to go into the dashboard and see what work his employees were working on, who has what, and how long they have had certain …
Features
ActiveBatch Workload AutomationIntegrify
Workload Automation
Comparison of Workload Automation features of Product A and Product B
ActiveBatch Workload Automation
9.6
Ratings
15% above category average
Integrify
-
Ratings
Multi-platform scheduling9.60 Ratings00 Ratings
Central monitoring9.60 Ratings00 Ratings
Logging9.60 Ratings00 Ratings
Alerts and notifications9.60 Ratings00 Ratings
Analysis and visualization9.60 Ratings00 Ratings
Application integration9.60 Ratings00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
ActiveBatch Workload AutomationIntegrify
Small Businesses

No answers on this topic

CMW Platform
CMW Platform
Score 8.9 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Apache Airflow
Apache Airflow
Score 8.6 out of 10
Quixy
Quixy
Score 9.9 out of 10
Enterprises
Redwood RunMyJobs
Redwood RunMyJobs
Score 9.6 out of 10
Redwood RunMyJobs
Redwood RunMyJobs
Score 9.6 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
ActiveBatch Workload AutomationIntegrify
Likelihood to Recommend
9.6
(0 ratings)
7.0
(0 ratings)
Usability
8.4
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
1.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
ActiveBatch Workload AutomationIntegrify
Likelihood to Recommend
Any large business or organisation that wants to manage their workload effectively and with the least amount of room for error might choose the ActiveBatch Automation tool. Being a consultant I feel that It aids in task automation and has the flexibility to change in response to varying company requirements. It helps to save huge time by doing all the repetitive tasks on daily basis. During the patching activity the schedulers can be stopped. It also help by alerting us if any system/job is down so that SLA can be saved. Overall ActiveBatch Automation stands as a dependable cornerstone for ensuring the seamless operation of our tasks.
Read full review
It is great as a way to move from a manual paper process to something digital and more streamlined. There is a learning curve for users when it comes to developing a proper form and following/tracking the flow of information. Overall it is a great move, just be ready for some resistance.
Read full review
Pros
  • Makes scheduling easy to understand, follow, and rerun jobs when necessary.
  • Allows for cross-team coordination of scheduled tasks which reduces errors.
  • Makes stopping jobs easy when needed for server/database downtime.
  • Scripting enables us to easily change email addresses for failed job alerts.
  • Nested plans/jobs make creating and changing dependencies simple.
Read full review
  • Easy to develop an intake form.
  • Workflow diagram is simple to follow and make adjustments to.
  • Dashboard is helpful in identifying bottlenecks in the process.
Read full review
Cons
  • String handling / parsing. I find myself using PowerShell to do a fair amount of text parsing (particularly if manipulations are needed) - not necessarily a bad thing, but certainly a place where ActiveBatch could be improved.
  • Debugging - or lack of it! With no stepping debugger, it can be a longer process than many other programming / scripting environments: rather than simply stepping through and observing state changes, I find myself inserting logging steps to excess, then having to clean them up once the error is found.
  • The perennial - Documentation! While a near-universal complaint for *any* software, ActiveBatch's developer documentation is somewhat spotty - just where I need detail, I find summary-level info. There is lots of documentation (as there should be for a tool with such a wide range of applications), but it is in mixed formats (some PDF, some CHM), and the descriptions of specific fields within job steps is often little more than I can get in a tool-tip in the GUI. Allowable ranges, expected formats for string data, and similar helpful details are inconsistent.
  • The KnowledgeBase at ASCI's web site often has examples which answer the questions I have, but not always - and not always under the search terms one would think to use.
Read full review
  • It's complicated. No, really. When you log in, you won't know much about what you're doing and you may only get about 10% of what the program is capable of. This is not a good thing as some will just give up before delving further into the program. If it is too complicated at the outset for someone who doesn't understand forms or how these kinds of programs work, you will not gain new clients unless you are there the moment they create an account. You can have someone reach out, but - in my experience - the decision to continue with a program or write it off is in the first ten minutes.
  • When I first looked at it, printing larger flows was an issue. They have since addressed this, so the point of mentioning this is that (while they eventually looked back at the bigger picture) looking at large and small views would have been helpful.
  • The people I consulted had issues with Javascript. There were ways to get around it, but these people did not have the time to spend on that and asked me to find another solution.
Read full review
Usability
We can easily add new plans/jobs in our batch schedules. Also, coordination with reporting and QA jobs is simple to do. Building schedules, restarting jobs, triggering dependencies is easy to understand. The system is very stable and allows us to easily see overall processing times.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
My colleague contacted them directly, I only know hearsay on this but it was not good.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
The workload automation solution is based on the specific needs of an organization, as well as the features, capabilities, and costs of various solutions. A thorough evaluation process and consideration of these factors can help ensure the selection of a solution that aligns with overall business objectives and meets the specific needs of the organization.
Read full review
When it comes to workflow, you want something reliable. Something that covers all the bases. You don't get that with a lot of platforms because they want to be the "heart of the <insert name here> industry." Integrify is like a little blob of playdough. It is its own creature, sitting there in the middle, just malleable enough for you to stretch it to whichever department you want without it breaking. If you handle it badly, it will break and not work. But if you treat it right, and work with it, then it can become virtually anything for you.
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • ActiveBatch can automate intricate procedures and minimise manual involvement, which can boost an organization's production and efficiency.
  • Organisations can save money by using ActiveBatch to automate operations, which lowers the expenses of manual labour and potential mistakes.
  • Implementing ActiveBatch could come with hefty up-front expenses including licencing, instruction, and consultancy fees, which could have a short-term negative impact on ROI.
Read full review
  • For the people I consulted - it helped them put more into the personal aspects of the business. While certain processes ran, they could keep an eye on the data, but were otherwise free to focus on the important aspects of the business. They were a marketing group. Their copywriter was able to be a copywriter instead of just filling out forms all day!
  • It's adaptable. You can cross-pollinate any department with it, provided you know what you are doing. So, you are not getting a program for HR, and another for Marketing. Integrify can span the whole business. You can cut costs in focusing on one workflow product rather than a handful.
  • It did have one negative impact on the place I consulted. Their tech-savvy person left in early 2019, and nobody else was able to use the program. Nor did they want to try when opening it up and trying to understand it. I was able to help out, but ultimately they were discouraged. I would recommend training multiple people if you use this product, and emphasize their support team!
Read full review
ScreenShots

Integrify Screenshots

Screenshot of Screenshot of Screenshot of Screenshot of Screenshot of Screenshot of Integrify Task History