TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    Aerospike

    Score9 out of 10
    N/AThe Aerospike Real-time Data Platform aims to enable organizations to act instantly across billions of transactions while reducing server footprint up to 80%. The vendor states Aerospike multi-cloud platform powers real-time applications with predictable sub-millisecond performance up to petabyte scale with five-nines uptime with globally distributed, consistent data. Aerospike boasts customers such as Airtel, Experian, European Central Bank, Nielsen, PayPal, Snap, Verizon Media and Wayfair.N/A

    Cassandra

    Score9 out of 10
    N/ACassandra is a no-SQL database from Apache.N/A
    Pricing
    AerospikeCassandra
    Editions & Modules
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    AerospikeCassandra
    Free Trial
    NoNo
    Free/Freemium Version
    NoNo
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoNo
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
    Additional Details——
    More Pricing Information
    Community Pulse
    AerospikeCassandra
    Considered Both Products
    Aerospike Inc
    Chose Aerospike
    From a scale and performance perspective, Aerospike is the best. The ability to power large scale deployments on much less hardware than the other database similar to Aerospike is a huge bonus. Also, even if you have more data, performance doesn't degrade.
    Incentivized
    Chose Aerospike
    Compared to the above for K/V lookups and writes, it is faster. However, less than 1 MB, i'd use Redis, if you're willing to write package for HA in Redis. However HA between Redis and aerospike, aerospike is top notch. K/V lookups were 20-30% faster than Redis, 50% faster …
    Incentivized
    Apache
    Chose Cassandra
    Against HBase, writes were faster. Reads not so much. Also ability to store in other formats would be good (such as objects). Compared to aerospike, does not compare. Aerospike blows it out of water.
    Incentivized
    Key User Insights
    Would buy again
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Delivers good value for the price
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Happy with the feature set
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Implementation went as expected
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Features
    AerospikeCassandra
    NoSQL Databases
    Comparison of NoSQL Databases features of Aerospike and Apache Cassandra
    Feature
    Aerospike
    9.9
    3 Ratings
    Apache Cassandra
    8.0
    5 Ratings
    Performance10.03 Ratings8.55 Ratings
    Availability10.03 Ratings8.85 Ratings
    Concurrency10.03 Ratings7.65 Ratings
    Security10.02 Ratings8.05 Ratings
    Scalability10.03 Ratings9.55 Ratings
    Data model flexibility10.03 Ratings6.75 Ratings
    Deployment model flexibility9.03 Ratings7.05 Ratings
    User Ratings
    AerospikeCassandra
    Likelihood to Recommend
    9.0
    (4 ratings)
    6.0
    (16 ratings)
    Likelihood to Renew
    8.0
    (1 ratings)
    8.6
    (16 ratings)
    Usability
    7.0
    (3 ratings)
    7.0
    (1 ratings)
    Support Rating
    8.9
    (2 ratings)
    7.0
    (1 ratings)
    Implementation Rating
    -
    (0 ratings)
    7.0
    (1 ratings)