Agari Phishing Response vs. Proofpoint Threat Response Auto-Pull

Agari is well-suited for when a positive email threat is detected and needs to be removed from uses' inboxes.

It is very well suited for any organization, though the pricing is more for larger organizations. Having auto pull available means you have fewer worries that phishing emails end up in users' mailboxes.

Incentivized

• Detects and alerts email threats.
• Remediate email threats from user inboxes.
• Generates great reports for upper management.

• Finds malicious messages in users mailboxes that were not previously detected.
• Gives good data about messages post-detection.
• Integrates with AD.

Incentivized

• Times on email when searching would be beneficial.
• Debug or advanced logging could be better.
• Remediation capabilities could be improved.

• Would like an Azure virtual machine version of it. Currently, it's only supported on VMware and AWS.
• Configuring authentication certificates on it is not easy.
• It does not work with RSASSA-PSS signed certificates.

Incentivized

It's easy to use and requires very little administrator hands on.

Incentivized

They are quick to respond and have talented support personnel.

Incentivized

Agari is a bit ahead of the curve when it comes to detecting email attacks and preventing users with remediation.

TRAP had fewer false positives and caught more malicious emails. With the host of companion products, it was more complete package. It gives us the ability to pull emails using an admin-submitted CVS file of emails to pull. EOP does not have this capability.

Incentivized

• Email attack remediation.
• Attractive price.
• Easy to navigate and use.

• Helped mitigate the email portion of our penetration test entirely.
• Made us aware of the amount of suspicious emails being delivered.
• Prevented malware spreading through mail.

Incentivized