TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    Ahrefs

    Score9 out of 10
    N/AAhrefs is an SEO tool providers. Ahrefs Site Explorer provides a suite of tools including a component for backlink & on-page SEO analysis, online brand mentions tracking, and domain comparison tool for competitor analysis, etc. They refer to themselves as “the largest index of live backlinks.”

    $99

    per month

    Majestic SEO

    Score8.5 out of 10
    N/AMajestic surveys and maps the Internet and has created a large commercial Link Intelligence database. This Internet map is used by SEOs, New Media Specialists, Affiliate Managers and online Marketing experts for a variety of uses surrounding online prominence including Link Building, Reputation Management, Website Traffic development, Competitor analysis and News Monitoring.

    $49.99

    per month

    Pricing
    AhrefsMajestic SEO
    Editions & Modules
    Lite
    $99.00
    per month
    Standard
    $179.00
    per month
    Advanced
    $399.00
    per month
    Agency
    $999.00
    per month
    Lite
    $49.99
    per month
    Pro
    $99.99
    per month
    Full API
    $399.99
    per month
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    AhrefsMajestic SEO
    Free Trial
    NoNo
    Free/Freemium Version
    YesYes
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoNo
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
    Additional Details——
    More Pricing Information
    Community Pulse
    AhrefsMajestic SEO
    Considered Both Products
    Ahrefs
    Chose Ahrefs
    Sadly we are coming [to] terms that even trough there are more and more options that Ahrefs has they are still incomplete or not working good enough. And the most important options (like frequent updates on rankings) are behind the most expensive membership.

    Right now we mainly …
    Incentivized
    Chose Ahrefs
    Ahrefs has more features and more accurate data than its competitors. While both Moz and Majestic are great tools and can be used as complimentary to Ahrefs, if you have to choose one tool, definitely choose Ahrefs. It has the biggest database of links and better stats for …
    Incentivized
    Chose Ahrefs
    Ahrefs Site Explorer gives us an easier way of obtaining backlinks when we're doing link building, whereas with other products I have a more difficult time finding viable backlinks. The keyword list you can export from Ahrefs is also a lot more clear than in other products …
    Incentivized
    Chose Ahrefs
    Having used most of the industry's SEO suites, I chose Ahrefs because of its crawl depth and massive suite of tools. Most of the other suites have similar tools, but Ahrefs beats them in both accuracy and speed. These things are important for any SEO professional who …
    Incentivized
    Chose Ahrefs
    Actually, I still use SEMRush and BrightLocal. Majestic, though, just didn't compare and certainly didn't have all the features that Ahrefs offers.
    Incentivized
    Chose Ahrefs
    At the time, Ahrefs had the most robust link index. Majesitc was a close second, and Moz lagged far behind. Since then, Moz promoted a major update and expansion of their link index, and it now bears further research to determine which product would be better for our …
    Incentivized
    Chose Ahrefs
    Majestic and Ahrefs are really close in terms of tool. Ahrefs does offer competitive comparison and they do have a more up to date data base. Majestic however has a more comprehensive historical view of sites which is also extremely valuable. Majestic also offers a link …
    Incentivized
    Chose Ahrefs
    I like Ahrefs because its index of backlinks is fresher than SEMRush and the way of presenting information is a lot more convenient and versatile than Majestic. Also, I like the fact that it's mostly focused on SEO vs. the broader approach that SEMRush takes.
    Incentivized
    Majestic SEO
    Chose Majestic SEO
    SEMRush, Moz, Ahrefs.
    All of these tools have their place and they all are very good. I can't really compare Majestic to any of them as I have very specific uses of Majestic. If I had to pick one tool to use for the rest of my SEO career it would probably be SEMRush. If I could …
    Incentivized
    Chose Majestic SEO
    We use Majestic SEO as the main tool for getting backlink data. Moz is a competitor that we also use but for a different purpose. With Majestic SEO we get a lot more accurate link numbers, where we use Moz for its rank tracker and metrics like Domain Authority. Moz doesn't …
    Incentivized
    Chose Majestic SEO
    Ahrefs Site Explorer comes pretty close to Majestic SEO. I always used both the tools in parallel as some features were better in Ahrefs. But if you are looking for a cheaper tool and don't use the backlink research tool so often, go for one of the plans from Majestic SEO.
    Incentivized
    Chose Majestic SEO
    Majestic just plain WORKS, and its pricing is much more affordable than Ahrefs.
    Incentivized
    Chose Majestic SEO
    I would say Ahrefs does somehow a better job in terms of data quality, ease of use and intuitiveness. Majestic SEO surely follows Ahrefs on the second position as per my opinion. Majestic SEO has a huge potential for improvement when it comes to the way tool portrays …
    Incentivized
    Chose Majestic SEO
    Majestic SEO is handy tool for SEO and you can easily navigate in it's dashboard. You can set everything and plan your preferences to have weekly and monthly reports. Respect to the other tools, Majestic SEO is doing well with it's performance and fresh database. It is really …
    Incentivized
    Chose Majestic SEO
    Majestic SEO is very strong tool in all manners and compare to other digital marketing tools, we are working with many of other tools to create our clients recommendation but the most data is fetched by Majestic SEO tool. That's the main reason to choose this tool and we are …
    Incentivized
    Chose Majestic SEO
    There are many tools for digital marketers on the web, so you just catch the right tool for a particular scenario and task. So we chose Majestic SEO for its competitive price, its features, ease of use, reporting manner with customizable options, and creative analysis of …
    Incentivized
    Chose Majestic SEO
    Majestic has a reputation of being one of the best tools out there. Compared to the other leaders in the SEO space, Majestic is probably the best all-around tool, with very concrete capabilities in the areas of keyword research, backlink profile analysis, and on-page technical …
    Incentivized
    Chose Majestic SEO
    Majestic has features that most of their competitors don't. The backlink index is better than SEMRush in my opinion which also lacks being able to look at links from a range of dates. Their metrics are harder to fool when compared to Moz and I would say that AHREF's is a good …
    Incentivized
    Chose Majestic SEO
    Majestic is best used in conjunction with a tool like Moz and SEMRush. Although it can be used by itself, it is difficult to work with unless you really know what you're looking for and how to use that data when you find it.
    Incentivized
    Chose Majestic SEO
    Most of the SEO platforms have their own unique features. Majestic really focuses on backlinks, which is arguably the most important aspect of SEO. It is not a full-feature platform such as Moz or SEMRush, but they are the best in backlinks. Majestic fits in any large-scale SEO …
    Incentivized
    Chose Majestic SEO
    Majestic is #2 on my list. SEMRush is my favorite because of its breadth of scope. The features it offers for a similar price are, in my opinion, superior. Majestic is better in terms of domain analysis. SEMRush is better in terms of keyword tracking, SEO Audits, PPC analysis, …
    Incentivized
    Chose Majestic SEO
    Majestic has the biggest index of backlinks. Also, it's list of parameters for backlinks is the biggest, which makes filtering backlinks a lot easier.

    Finally, Majestic has Bulk Backlink Checker, which saver a lot of time when checking backlinks of freelance link builders.
    Incentivized
    Chose Majestic SEO
    Majestic SEO is sort of in its own league compared to Open Site Explorer and Google Search Console. GSC really only offers the links it finds and does limit to 1000 links on export. OSE is part of a larger package of Moz tools. It does a solid job of finding links but doesn't …
    Incentivized
    Key User Insights
    Would buy again
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Delivers good value for the price
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Happy with the feature set
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Implementation went as expected
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    TrustRadius Insights
    AhrefsMajestic SEO
    Highlights

    TrustRadius
    Research Team Insight
    Published

    Reviewers have found that both Ahrefs and Majestic SEO are commonly used for their backlink analysis features. Customers have noted that Ahrefs provides more detailed metrics for landing pages, which aids in understanding the overall health of a website’s backlink profile. On the other hand, users of Majestic SEO have shared that its visualization tools make it easier to observe link patterns and effectively formulate link-building strategies.

    In terms of keyword research, users have shared differing experiences with Ahrefs and Majestic SEO. Ahrefs users have praised its keyword explorer for providing a detailed overview of the search landscape, including search volume, keyword difficulty, and related keyword suggestions. Users have noted that this feature helps in optimizing content to align with search trends. On the other hand, Majestic SEO users have highlighted that its lack of keyword research capabilities can be a constraint in developing SEO strategies.

    For tracking and reporting abilities, comparisons have been made between Ahrefs and Majestic SEO. It has been observed by customers that Ahrefs shines in its rank tracking capabilities, presenting clear, detailed information about keyword performance and ranking changes. On the flip side, Majestic SEO users have found that while it lacks similar detailed ranking tracking, it offers comprehensive link-building reports, which have been useful in evaluating the quality and quantity of backlinks.

    Features
    AhrefsMajestic SEO
    SEO
    Comparison of SEO features of Ahrefs and Majestic SEO
    Feature
    Ahrefs
    7.8
    71 Ratings
    Majestic SEO
    8.5
    20 Ratings
    Keyword analysis9.568 Ratings9.016 Ratings
    Backlink management8.569 Ratings9.020 Ratings
    SERP ranking tracking9.467 Ratings9.011 Ratings
    Page grader5.261 Ratings8.014 Ratings
    Competitive analysis9.469 Ratings8.019 Ratings
    Site audit / diagnostics8.064 Ratings9.015 Ratings
    Site recommendations5.660 Ratings7.015 Ratings
    Task management7.032 Ratings9.08 Ratings
    SEO Channels
    Comparison of SEO Channels features of Ahrefs and Majestic SEO
    Feature
    Ahrefs
    7.5
    62 Ratings
    Majestic SEO
    8.5
    16 Ratings
    Local SEO8.450 Ratings8.012 Ratings
    Social SEO6.147 Ratings8.59 Ratings
    Mobile SEO6.046 Ratings8.511 Ratings
    Global SEO9.656 Ratings9.015 Ratings
    SEO Platform & Account Management
    Comparison of SEO Platform & Account Management features of Ahrefs and Majestic SEO
    Feature
    Ahrefs
    8.9
    59 Ratings
    Majestic SEO
    9.5
    17 Ratings
    Multi-domain support9.456 Ratings9.017 Ratings
    Integration with web analytics tools8.429 Ratings10.014 Ratings
    User Ratings
    AhrefsMajestic SEO
    Likelihood to Recommend
    9.7
    (76 ratings)
    9.0
    (23 ratings)
    Likelihood to Renew
    10.0
    (5 ratings)
    10.0
    (4 ratings)
    Usability
    9.3
    (4 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Support Rating
    8.8
    (14 ratings)
    9.0
    (3 ratings)