Airship vs. Twilio Zipwhip (discontinued)

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Airship
Score 8.5 out of 10
N/A
The Airship Experience Platform provides an end-to-end solution for unifying experiences across channels and capturing value across the entire customer lifecycle.N/A
Twilio Zipwhip (discontinued)
Score 8.1 out of 10
N/A
Zipwhip, a texting-for-businesses application for two-way text between a company and its customers, was acquired by Twilio, and discontinued.
$19
per month
Pricing
AirshipTwilio Zipwhip (discontinued)
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
Starter
$19.00
per month
Unlimited
$49.00
per month
Premium
$99.00
per month
Commercial
Contact sales team
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
AirshipTwilio Zipwhip (discontinued)
Free Trial
YesNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeOptionalNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
AirshipTwilio Zipwhip (discontinued)
Considered Both Products
Airship
Chose Airship
They are the only Application/Push vendor we have used since I started w/ the company about 4 years ago. I believe we have sued them since 2016 or so.
Chose Airship
Airship allows for more uses for a better value and is more of a focused outreach for the parishioners, and much easier to use with mobile devises.
Chose Airship
We've tested a bunch of different CRM tools over the years and Airship has been a winner for its functionality, features, cost, and ability to integrate with other softwares that we use. It has been great for SMS and mobile in particular. It could certainly be a one stop shop …
Chose Airship
Airship have a very different set of features, we could not find an exact match of it.
Chose Airship
Easy user interface and seamless integration. Great Customer engagement
Chose Airship
Airship allows for more uses for a better value and is more of a focused outreach for the parishioners, and much easier to use with mobile devises.
Chose Airship
We use Sailthru for emails. We have not used them for pushes so I can't compare the two.
Chose Airship
The above mentioned products were evaluated for initial RFQ process however Airship was awarded for the robustness and ease of use, and its strategy aligns with Vodafone's App usage engagement
Chose Airship
Airship is superb in customer support against all others. Even though I feel CleverTap may be a better choice but probably will not be as easy as Airship when setting them up and operating it. As for MoEngage, the last experience I had was simply not good enough, but that was …
Chose Airship
I have also worked with Vibes, Salesforce, Pendo, and Swrve for mobile app marketing efforts, and I always come back to airship as delivering the best Push and In-App messaging capabilities. If you want a full service platform for Push and In-App messaging rather than …
Chose Airship
There was a time when we went off Urban Airship and went to Spreed. We were using Spreed's app, so there was much better integration on push notifications. The push notification took readers directly into the story. When we moved from Spreed to our own native app, we went back …
Twilio Zipwhip (discontinued)
Chose Twilio Zipwhip (discontinued)
I have not evaluated any other company I switched to Textellent The best option around
Chose Twilio Zipwhip (discontinued)
MyCase previously didn't have texting (it does now). When we chose Zipwhip, there was nothing out there at the time that compared to it. We selected Zipwhip because it was a low-cost and easy-to-use add-on to our tech stack that allowed us to communicate quickly with people, …
Chose Twilio Zipwhip (discontinued)
We used DYL prior to getting Zipwhip but DYL is more expensive and is not integrated with our CRM.
Chose Twilio Zipwhip (discontinued)
While we still use Dialpad for calls since Zipwhip does not support calls, Dialpad gave us far less visibility into employee communications. We were always spending a lot of time discussing something that an employee said to another user without having the full context of the …
Chose Twilio Zipwhip (discontinued)
Zipwhip is just a little bit more user-friendly than AliveChat because it allows you to text people on more scale. AliveChat has a great website chat function, but its texting platform is a little more clunky than Zipwhip. Zipwhip is a little more expensive but definitely the …
Chose Twilio Zipwhip (discontinued)
We hadn't really looked at other services before choosing Zipwhip as there were not a lot of test-to-landline companies when we began looking. The price was right and the customer service was amazing. It was easy to learn the software and to onboard our entire team. When we …
Chose Twilio Zipwhip (discontinued)
We mainly use EZ Texting to bulk text when needed and we use Dialpad for our 1 on 1 communications via text now. Our voice is through Dialpad so it is a lot more efficient for agents to be in one place for all manners of communication. EZ Texting allows us to bulk text where …
Chose Twilio Zipwhip (discontinued)
None. I wasn't involved in the decision making, however, I like all the options Zipwhip has to offer.
Chose Twilio Zipwhip (discontinued)
Enabling the business number is a key feature for us. Also, their pricing is all inclusive which is super helpful and a lot easier when it is not per text pricing model for our kind of business and reselling.
Best Alternatives
AirshipTwilio Zipwhip (discontinued)
Small Businesses
OneSignal
OneSignal
Score 8.0 out of 10
OneSignal
OneSignal
Score 8.0 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Flurry Analytics
Flurry Analytics
Score 9.0 out of 10
Flurry Analytics
Flurry Analytics
Score 9.0 out of 10
Enterprises
Flurry Analytics
Flurry Analytics
Score 9.0 out of 10
Flurry Analytics
Flurry Analytics
Score 9.0 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
AirshipTwilio Zipwhip (discontinued)
Likelihood to Recommend
8.9
(0 ratings)
4.5
(0 ratings)
Usability
6.0
(0 ratings)
8.0
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
9.0
(0 ratings)
1.4
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
AirshipTwilio Zipwhip (discontinued)
Likelihood to Recommend
Well-Suited for: 1. Mobile App Notifications: Ideal for targeted push notifications in apps. 2. Customer Segmentation: Effective for personalized marketing campaigns based on user data. 3. Event-Triggered Automation: Great for automated messaging based on user actions. 4. A/B Testing: Useful for optimizing campaign messages and strategies. Less Appropriate for: 1. Non-Mobile Channels: Less effective if the primary focus is on non-mobile communications like email or direct mail. 2. Basic Email Marketing: Other platforms might be better suited for simple, broad email campaigns without complex segmentation or personalization needs.
Read full review
Zipwhip is well suited for brief communication at scale. Our Fan services reps after close to 1,000 accounts, and this allows them to get out quick messages at scale. It is less appropriate for longer messages where email or a phone call is the better route to reach out.
Read full review
Pros
  • Setting up the target audience within Airship using attributes is one of my favorites.
  • Airship has a very user-friendly interface with detailed documentation for self-help. I also enjoy the training sessions, articles and reports Airship organized as those are very insightful and useful.
Read full review
  • Scheduled texts - when scheduling an appointment, we schedule a text to be sent prior to this appointment
  • Automations - we can set up auto texts and responses
Read full review
Cons
  • The automated A/B testing winner selection and application should be added
  • The flexibility of message shape, specifically incorporating transparency so messages do not need to be a rectangular shape
  • Faster and more reliable servers around the globe
  • Making more detailed use cases and tutorials to be followed can simplify things for users
Read full review
  • I would like the quick-use app that pulls from the taskbar to be able to hold more characters- It can only do 250 while the main screen can do 600.
  • The ability to send video through this program would significantly enhance its functionality for us.
Read full review
Usability
The interface takes a bit getting used to in order to know how to take advantage of everything. Some of the analytics that are available are particularly hard to find, so it's important to pay attention when customer support reviews everything, but everything I'd want and need in terms of Push and In-App messaging is all there.
Read full review
It was very easy for users to use, straight forward, and user friendly. The desktop app is very basic but easy to reply to an incoming text, but the user had to know to allow Chrome notifications to see new incoming text via the web browser, which is how they mainly used it.
Read full review
Support Rating
I have not had to interact much with customer support as I have been able to find the vast majority of the answers I'm looking for within their documentation, which I very much appreciate because it saves me a lot of time. Customer support has been responsive and helpful for the most part during the couple of interactions I've had.
Read full review
Swift response time, multiple people have been willing to help with any issue, really anything you could be looking for from a service standpoint, they offer.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
I have also worked with Vibes, Salesforce, Pendo, and Swrve for mobile app marketing efforts, and I always come back to airship as delivering the best Push and In-App messaging capabilities. If you want a full service platform for Push and In-App messaging rather than configuring these channels through something that is no cost such as Firebase, then i would recommend Airship.
Read full review
We hadn't really looked at other services before choosing Zipwhip as there were not a lot of test-to-landline companies when we began looking. The price was right and the customer service was amazing. It was easy to learn the software and to onboard our entire team. When we began letting our customers know about the new texting capability we had, they were curious about it and grew to love it. Because we're able to link it with their trip, they not only can receive status updates but also a link to our GPS, so they can see where their chauffeur and vehicle are in real-time, along with a photo of the chauffeur and the vehicle. This function is perhaps our corporate clients' most favorite feature as they don't have to call to see where the vehicle for their VIP is; they can watch it in real-time. For group work, Zipwhip lets us send the program manager customized updates for all of their booked trips. This is such a time saver in so many ways. Time is money and for a small business, there are many ways that this helps. Our employees spend less time on the phone and productivity is increased. Texting is great too as it serves as documentation should any issues arise.
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • The ROI has increased more than approx. 50% (exact details to be confirmed) based on cross-channel orchestration
  • Using push notifications alone, we have seen a huge increase in app engagement which was a challenge before to nudge users to get back to the App after initial download
Read full review
  • They out of the blue raised the price 300% on us that negatively impacted the budget we had planned out for the year.
  • Initially it did help increase contact rates.
  • Time consuming and hard to manage.
Read full review
ScreenShots

Airship Screenshots

Screenshot of Screenshot of Screenshot of