airSlate WorkFlow vs. IFTTT

airSlate WorkFlow

airSlate WorkFlow

26 Reviews and Ratings

IFTTT

IFTTT

54 Reviews and Ratings

Overview
Product	Rating	Most Used By	Product Summary	Starting Price
airSlate WorkFlow	Score 7.5 out of 10	N/A	airSlate is a codeless workflow building platform, focusing on document generation, contract lifecycle management with e-sign, and what the vendor describes as mobile-friendly web forms which can be integrated with systems of record (e.g. CRM, etc), using no code airSlate bots.	N/A
IFTTT	Score 6.7 out of 10	N/A	IFTTT is a marketing automation software solution offered by IFTTT. It is scaled for non-technical users and less complex, generally two-step connectors and API’s.	N/A

Pricing

airSlate WorkFlow

IFTTT

Editions & Modules

No answers on this topic

No answers on this topic

Offerings

Pricing Offerings
airSlate WorkFlow	IFTTT
Free Trial
Yes	Yes
Free/Freemium Version
Yes	Yes
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No	No

Entry-level Setup Fee

Optional

No setup fee

Additional Details

—

—

More Pricing Information

Community Pulse
	airSlate WorkFlow	IFTTT
Considered Both Products	airSlate WorkFlow Danielle Sullivan Property Specialist Chose airSlate WorkFlow HelloSign is the only other products we've used but it does not have the automation we needed. We used it when we were processing fewer digital forms and most others were required by our legal department to be printed and signed. Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose airSlate WorkFlow airSlate is cheaper to utilize, and allows for more specified automation. I always worry about the per envelope cost for DocuSign, which is not a factor when utilizing airSlate. airSlate also notifies us if there is an issue with a bot, whereas we have had people attempt to … Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose airSlate WorkFlow I think each one has its purpose and one product can't be everything. airSlate does a great job at being economical for a business while also delivering the software that you need with the ability to make it your own. the support team is also outstanding which is a huge plus. Incentivized Helpful? LC LaVonne Carlson Salesforce Administrator Chose airSlate WorkFlow We had been unable to get much attention from DocuSign support/sales when we decided we wanted to connect forms to Salesforce. I stumbled across airSlate on the appExchange, and their sales team was responsive and helpful. I haven't worked in DocuSign myself, but my users tell … Incentivized Helpful? AS Amy Stoll Administrative Assistant Chose airSlate WorkFlow N/A Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose airSlate WorkFlow We initially thought airSlate could replace Cognito Forms for our company. However airSlate is missing key features that would allow this. We currently use Cognito Forms to take form entries for clinical samples we receive in the lab and then in bulk are able to ingest new … Incentivized Helpful? AS Anup Sharma Web Administrator Chose airSlate WorkFlow Airslate has better integration and automation capabilities Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose airSlate WorkFlow it is not as good. Incentivized Helpful? AB Adam Beaty Owner Chose airSlate WorkFlow We've used several other web form applications but none of them add the ease of use as airSlate. Also, none of them integrated with our other tech stack, such as Salesforce. Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose airSlate WorkFlow I never used the actual product other than signing documents Incentivized Helpful? RB Rachael Bock Director of Care Coordination Chose airSlate WorkFlow We chose airSlate over docusign because it allowed us to customize more things. DocuSign was getting pricier and allowed less customization or tools for the same price airSlate was offering. airSlate also gave us a non profit discount and allowed for us to be HIPAA compliant … Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose airSlate WorkFlow One of the other platforms we used was terribly hard to configure correctly- we spent many many hours on processes that never worked correctly- and two of these platforms did not have transparency in what they said they could do and what they could really do. And the feature … Incentivized Helpful? TM Tanner Marzullo Manager, Operations Chose airSlate WorkFlow airSlate is cheaper and the automations save a lot of time. The only issue with airSlate is you can not share document links. Incentivized Helpful? SEAN SIEMEN Vice President of Finance Chose airSlate WorkFlow Adobe is extremely easy to use for forms that have to be built every time - like tax returns - even when it sometimes thinks every box needs data that is already there from the tax program. It requires no account creation or other hoops for the signer to complete a signature … Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose airSlate WorkFlow airSlate covers some processes that are not available yet in power automate, or have an additional cost / third party reliance. airSlate also has the ability to produce solutions in a sometimes faster manner than power automate, depending on the complexity. Plus, the licensing … Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose airSlate WorkFlow With airSlate, you are not bound to just one type of tool like you are with Google forms. airSlate allows you to link to other tools, other than Google to make the forms work even better. Incentivized Helpful? AM Anthony Matero Technical Writer Chose airSlate WorkFlow While maintaining similar features as alternative products, airSlate is easier to use and less expensive. It is quicker to setup and creating new forms and workflows are easy with the help of built-in templates. I find the user interface friendly and well designed compared to … Incentivized Helpful? PW Paul Welsh HS Technology and Innovation Coordinator Chose airSlate WorkFlow Kissflow was overly complex and costly. Forms On Fire didn't seem to have the support we needed. We already subscribe to Adobe Sign, but was a hassle to figure out how to construct a cascading set of authorisations that pulled data from a sheet according to user input. Incentivized Helpful? BC Brian Del Terzo Credilife® Program Director Chose airSlate WorkFlow Tallyfy is a wonderfully robust solution but airSlate further connected the dots for us with the full integration to the electronic signature aspect of our needs. I'm not sure where Tallyfy stands currently on that front. Incentivized Helpful?	IFTTT Verified User Anonymous Chose IFTTT Less programmatic capabilities, somewhat simpler design interface. More sophisticated events supported per task. Ultimately, the kinds of tasks that need automation are simple, and a simple/easily maintainable user interface ensures no more time than is needed is spent on this … Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose IFTTT Zapier is always trying to feed me information I don't want, whereas IFTTT has a clean, easy to use website. Microsoft Flow is time-consuming to set up, IFTTT isn't. In my line of work, time is very important. I need to do the work and get it done. Automate doesn't offer the … Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose IFTTT I initially was using Zapier for some of my simple integrations but started using IFTTT for some of our project work as it allowed me to do logical connections between applications. While it's great in some areas, it can be improved upon to allow for more deep configurations. Incentivized Helpful? Kyle Kochtan Technical Lead Chose IFTTT We have used Microsoft Flow, Stringify and IFTTT for various solutions. Stringify is no longer an option as it was shut down. We have found that IFTTT and Flow both have their place and in some places working together for the same task. We have found there is no one … Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose IFTTT On inspection, it did not seem as simple to use. In fairness I was very happy with IFTTT and did not spend much time looking into Zapier Incentivized Helpful? Josephine Stafford Owner Chose IFTTT I like that IFTTT is free and it’s just what I need for my business currently. Incentivized Helpful? Benjamin Hale Digital Marketing Analyst Chose IFTTT IFTTT is free and easy to use, where Zapier has a freemium business model. We actually use both platforms for different things. I prefer Zapier for more complicated connections, where IFTTT allows us to have more connections without the added fee. Additionally, IFTTT allows us … Incentivized Helpful? Marcelo de Vasconcellos Senior Visual Designer Chose IFTTT As IFTTT, Zapier also helps users to connect apps and services, but it seems more directed to the corporative world. While IFTTT provides support for home devices (as lighting and security systems) and voice assistants (Alexa, Cortana, Google Assistant, and Siri), Zapier … Incentivized Helpful? Jeff Huisjen Director of studentLife Chose IFTTT IFTTT has worked better for us than Hootsuite because we utilize it spur of the moment and only have to post to one platform. Once that post is done IFTTT does the rest and we're good to go. Using the native social media apps and software has allowed us to schedule posts in a … Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose IFTTT Honestly I use both, since Zapier is a bit more robust. However, IFTTT is much easier to use and configure. It is much more friendly. Incentivized Helpful? Atilla Vekony Vice President Chose IFTTT I am using both but for different uses. DLVR.IT seems to be opimized for social media sharing only, whereas that is only a small part of what IFTTT does. Incentivized Helpful? Jerry Janes Digital Media Specialist Chose IFTTT Compared to Buffer, IFTTT has a far greater reach and scope, across numerous Social and off-site platforms. If you work in SEO, Content, or marketing in general, marrying IFTTT with Buffer will provide functionality you otherwise pay for. Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose IFTTT Office 365 has a program called Flow that functions similar to IFTTT, however, IFTTT has more integrations with 3rd parties and Flow has problems with getting triggers to go off properly. Unless there were some corporate requirement to utilize Flow only or limit integrations, I … Incentivized Helpful? Jared DeLong DIrector of Engagement Chose IFTTT I haven't used Zapier extensively, but it seems that IFTTT is much simpler to set up. However, Zapier appears to be a much deeper integration where you can sync a variety of fields of data and customize the sync more than you can with IFTTT. Zapier may be more valuable for … Incentivized Helpful? Chelsea Baldwin Founder Chose IFTTT Basically the same, though it seems Zapier can do more complex things. Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose IFTTT In my mind, the only real competitor to IFTTT is Zapier. Zapier is great because of the amount of SaaS tools that it has, but Zapier fails in the ease of use category. Zapier's website is slow, and the integrations can be confusing to set up. IFTTT is simple, easy to use. Incentivized Helpful? Jared Whitley SaaS Administrator Chose IFTTT IFTTT has more "end user" connections that Zapier thus making it more for users and less for power-users. Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose IFTTT In the past, I have run scripting on a Linux server to provide some level of integration of some of the smart devices in the workspace. This had always been cludgy and at times unreliable as it oftentimes fell victim to idiosyncrasies in the devices being controlled. IFTTT … Incentivized Helpful? Ksenia Newton Digital Marketing Manager Chose IFTTT These products are not really the same. While I use a three to track mentions, competitors, and keywords, IFTTT provides the ground for automation. Incentivized Helpful? Kim Rinde Professional Pet Sitter Chose IFTTT Actually, I have not used any other programs or services similar to IFTTT as of yet. Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose IFTTT Zapier is a more in-depth if-then statement builder with way more detailed integrations to hundreds of applications as well as different tasks that can get implemented within your if then, then that statements. Way cooler and there are certification options that help you get to … Incentivized Helpful? Mudassir Malik Oracle Certified HCM Cloud Consultant Chose IFTTT While other paid services might give your a little extra features and possibly a connectivity with enterprise application, it's nearly impossible to beat IFTTT with the cost factor, ease of use, hundreds of channels and a great community of users. Incentivized Helpful? Justin Strachan Business Owner Chose IFTTT IFTTT has the most integrations, the least bug recipes and it is the cheapest alternative. IFTTT has also been in the game for years. Automation for the people! You cannot get the kind if ideas from any other integration site, and many are missing key apps like Instagram or … Incentivized Helpful? Andrew Rincon MBA, LUTCF Insurance Advisor Chose IFTTT Truthfully I use both of these products. IFTTT is a very robust app but it does not get any where near as robust as Zapier. But although Zapier is more robust, for simpler tasks IFTTT is not only easier to set up, but gets the job done just as well. And now that IFTTT is … Incentivized Helpful? Elaine Foster Customer Success Manager Chose IFTTT IFTTT is great for personal, home-life use, as it targets social media, personal email preferences, and home-automation devices. Zapier is much more business-oriented and does not provide integrations with Amazon Alexa or WeMo home devices. Incentivized Helpful?

Features

airSlate WorkFlow

IFTTT

Cloud Data Integration

Comparison of Cloud Data Integration features of Product A and Product B
	airSlate WorkFlow - Ratings	IFTTT 6.7 Ratings 18% below category average
Pre-built connectors	00 Ratings	7.80 Ratings
Connector modification	00 Ratings	6.20 Ratings
Support for real-time and batch integration	00 Ratings	6.90 Ratings
Data quality services	00 Ratings	5.10 Ratings
Data security features	00 Ratings	7.60 Ratings
Monitoring console	00 Ratings	6.50 Ratings

Best Alternatives
	airSlate WorkFlow	IFTTT
Small Businesses	Stackby Score 9.0 out of 10	Make Score 8.9 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies	CMW Platform Score 8.9 out of 10	IBM App Connect Score 9.5 out of 10
Enterprises	CMW Platform Score 8.9 out of 10	IBM App Connect Score 9.5 out of 10
All Alternatives	View all alternatives	View all alternatives

User Ratings
	airSlate WorkFlow	IFTTT
Likelihood to Recommend	7.5 (0 ratings)	8.7 (0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew	7.7 (0 ratings)	10.0 (0 ratings)
Usability	5.0 (0 ratings)	7.0 (0 ratings)
Support Rating	3.6 (0 ratings)	8.0 (0 ratings)
Implementation Rating	- (0 ratings)	10.0 (0 ratings)
Configurability	7.5 (0 ratings)	- (0 ratings)

User Testimonials
	airSlate WorkFlow	IFTTT
Likelihood to Recommend	Well suited for forms that need to be signed by one or more people (ie multiple levels of managers). Great to keep all completed slates in one section so that you can find what was completed and where. It does get a bit tricky with routing when it's a bit of back and forth. Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review	IFTTT is a great tool for people wishing to integrate different productivity tools, but who lack the resources and/or knowledge about programming these connections themselves. Anyone who uses at least email, calendar and social networks on a regular basis can benefit from IFTTT. However, it probably won't be appropriate and/or relevant to casual users, or users inexperienced with the many possible links between smartphones and online apps. Incentivized Marcelo de Vasconcellos Senior Visual Designer Read full review
Pros	The airSlate interface is very easy to use. Creating new forms or updating existing ones is way less challenging than other similar platforms. airSlate integration with other platforms is straightforward and doesn't require special unique code. The look and feel of the user interface is clean and inviting. Incentivized AM Anthony Matero Technical Writer Read full review	Their UX and UI for creating recipes is brilliant. So easy to use and very well thought out. I love that you can search for recipes other users have created and implement those if you choose to do so. It saved me so much time vs. having to figure certain recipes on my own. Their notification and syncing options are spot on. I love how much I can customize what I want to see. Their variety of apps is also phenomenal and I love that they're adding new integrations/apps every week. Incentivized Jared DeLong DIrector of Engagement Read full review
Cons	Field mapping to Salesforce is precise but a bit fidgety. Would be nice to be able to do it on the form builder instead of in a separate bot. Fillable fields in PDFs are ugly. It would be nice if font size/spacing/alignment actually matched the document. Incentivized LC LaVonne Carlson Salesforce Administrator Read full review	It would be nice if there were more business software platforms on IFTTT, but I think that will come with time. I wish the site had an area to search pre-built integrations based on category or need. There really aren't too many cons to using IFTTT, the service gets better all the time and continues to grow almost daily. Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review
Likelihood to Renew	I give this rating because I am hopeful the functions I would like will be added in the near future. Incentivized SEAN SIEMEN Vice President of Finance Read full review	There is no better alternative and although Integromat is new and the GUI is slick, they make you pay per push and IFTTT does not. The rest of the competition make you pay per integration or are just not as seamless in usage or have the depth of catalogue. If you use Zapier for instance, it is because they have an integration you have to use, not because Zapier does a better job. Incentivized Justin Strachan Business Owner Read full review
Usability	Starting with a template it is easy to see how parts of the workflow are connected and make changes that will customise the product for your own use case. In our situation, rather than starting from scratch, our form was working within hours of joining the trial version. Several hours of tweaks lead us to a form that is better than the tool it was replacing and we are saving real man-hours with a minimum investment of time and money. Service has been exceptional. Incentivized PW Paul Welsh HS Technology and Innovation Coordinator Read full review	For the most part, IFTTT is great but it does have its limitations. You may only do one thing at a time. If you want branching logic it can be cumbersome and clunky. This it where something like Microsoft Flow does better. For simplicity, nothing can beat IFTTT for how easy it is to set up and use right out of the box Incentivized Kyle Kochtan Technical Lead Read full review
Support Rating	I have reached out to airSlate support a number of times during setup and after. The platform includes a built-in support chat that is very convenient and fast. I'm able to get the answers I need is less time than it takes with any other software I use. And I don't need to pick up a phone or write an email and wait for a response. They support staff is very knowledgeable and accommodating Incentivized AM Anthony Matero Technical Writer Read full review	I have had a few issues with apps over the years. Compared to other services, ITFFF is the best choice but no service is perfect unless you build it yourself for yourself. ITFFF needs more tutorials on how to create a custom platform, but overall I will recommend it as an easy to use, time-saving service. Verified User Anonymous Read full review
Implementation Rating	No answers on this topic	Just try it for your own social media platforms. Then imagine how much money it can save/make. Incentivized Justin Strachan Business Owner Read full review
Alternatives Considered	HelloSign is the only other products we've used but it does not have the automation we needed. We used it when we were processing fewer digital forms and most others were required by our legal department to be printed and signed. Incentivized Danielle Sullivan Property Specialist Read full review	IFTTT is free and easy to use, where Zapier has a freemium business model. We actually use both platforms for different things. I prefer Zapier for more complicated connections, where IFTTT allows us to have more connections without the added fee. Additionally, IFTTT allows us to do more unique and one-off automations. Incentivized Benjamin Hale Digital Marketing Analyst Read full review
Return on Investment	Time saved from having to email or run documents to other people for sign off Time saved from auto-storing documents in the correct place once we get all the bots set up Confidence from a legal standpoint due to the validity of e-signatures and its tracking Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review	IFTTT was a free program for us and has worked wonders. The time that it saves us when it posts across platforms is great because we only have to post one picture and caption and it goes out to all of our social media accounts. IFTTT has definitely helped us to communicate more and in better ways. Incentivized Jeff Huisjen Director of studentLife Read full review
ScreenShots		IFTTT Screenshots