TrustRadius

Alienbrain Studio vs. Bitbucket Server (discontinued)

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Alienbrain Studio
Score 0.0 out of 10
N/A
N/A
$150
per year
Bitbucket Server (discontinued)
Score 6.0 out of 10
N/A
Bitbucket Server (formerly Stash) from Atlassian was a self-hosted source code management solution. The product is no longer available for sale, and support for existing licenses ended in 2024.N/A
Pricing
Alienbrain StudioBitbucket Server (discontinued)
Editions & Modules
Basic
$150
per year
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Alienbrain StudioBitbucket Server (discontinued)
Free Trial
YesNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details——
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Alienbrain StudioBitbucket Server (discontinued)
Considered Both Products
Alienbrain Studio

No answer on this topic

Bitbucket Server (discontinued)
Verified User
Anonymous
Chose Bitbucket Server (discontinued)
We migrated several of our applications to BitBucket from legacy Team Foundation Server, and the experience has been significantly better. It's easy to use and plenty flexible. Other solutions such as GitHub are also good, but we needed to keep everything on-prem due to …
Oscar Narváez Del Rio | TrustRadius Reviewer
Oscar Narváez Del Rio
Tools and Analytic Monitoring Leader
Chose Bitbucket Server (discontinued)
Bitbucket Server (formerly Stash), as part of Atlassian products, provides a native integration framework and tools for automation. The platform supports git and mercurial repositories and provides features to export and import repositories from other projects. Migration to the …
Verified User
Anonymous
Chose Bitbucket Server (discontinued)
In our specific scenario and company goals, we chose Bitbucket because it has better integration with other Attlassian products and cost / benefit.
Verified User
Anonymous
Chose Bitbucket Server (discontinued)
We started off with Apache Subversion (SVN) and moved over to Git (supported via Bitbucket) as Git itself has started to become the new industry norm. The pull request feature allows developers to perform code reviews without needing another code review application. We settled …
Verified User
Anonymous
Chose Bitbucket Server (discontinued)
If you are selecting a product to use and you are not currently using version control, it may be in your best interest to choose another tool. Bitbucket Server is not as feature rich and doesn't feel as mature as some other platforms and arguably, with the lost production from …
Dane Allen | TrustRadius Reviewer
Dane Allen
Software Developer, Xactware Solutions, Inc.
Chose Bitbucket Server (discontinued)
Stash works better for hosting large repositories used across an enterprise.
Verified User
Anonymous
Chose Bitbucket Server (discontinued)
GitHub, Team Foundation Server, Visual SourceSafe and Bitbucket
Verified User
Anonymous
Chose Bitbucket Server (discontinued)
Stash was selected before I was at the company, but we're looking at these alternatives and actively considering switching. Stash seems to have all the necessary features we need to make it work, but it doesn't have any bells and whistles or extra special features that we can …
Darian Rawson | TrustRadius Reviewer
Darian Rawson
Senior Designer
Chose Bitbucket Server (discontinued)
It can be daunting to set up a Git server for a developer. Managing it can be more time consuming than you want it to be. Stash helps you out by handling what you likely need. If you are already a Git pro, you won't need it, but our team loves the simplicity that Stash brings …
Best Alternatives
Alienbrain StudioBitbucket Server (discontinued)
Small Businesses
Git
Git
Score 10.0 out of 10
Git
Git
Score 10.0 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Git
Git
Score 10.0 out of 10
Git
Git
Score 10.0 out of 10
Enterprises
Perforce P4
Perforce P4
Score 7.6 out of 10
Perforce P4
Perforce P4
Score 7.6 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Alienbrain StudioBitbucket Server (discontinued)
Likelihood to Recommend
-
(0 ratings)
8.9
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
-
(0 ratings)
10.0
(0 ratings)
Usability
-
(0 ratings)
5.0
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
-
(0 ratings)
9.0
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Alienbrain StudioBitbucket Server (discontinued)
Likelihood to Recommend
No answers on this topic
Bitbucket Server (formerly Stash) is suitable for departments or teams with the capacity to manage and support their own products and the availability to implement the tool on their own infrastructure. Bitbucket Server (formerly Stash) enables a good framework based on git to integrate the development cycle and to handle anything from a minor group of users and repositories to an extended usage with multiple users and roles collaborating in different projects.
Oscar Narváez Del Rio | TrustRadius Reviewer
Oscar Narváez Del Rio
Tools and Analytic Monitoring Leader
Read full review
Pros
No answers on this topic
  • Projects & Permissions - Stash keeps you and your developers productive by providing a way to structure your repositories and manage permissions via a simple, yet powerful user interface. Stash is very easy to use, manage & administer.
  • Essentially Stash gives two versions of interfaces to work with.
  • Stash Repository hosted on a server.
  • Atlassian SourceTree.
  • Atlassian Sourcetree is a tool to work with a code in stash. The two 'web' and 'desktop' versions make working with code user friendly, intuitive and comprehensive.
  • Connectivity to JIRA - Stash keeps track of all issues associated with commits. Users can use Stash to quickly see all issues associated with a commit, or use the Source tab on JIRA issues for an aggregate view of all the code changes that are related to a specific JIRA issue. With this information available, your development team saves time when tracking particular bug fixes or improvements.
Advait Deshpande | TrustRadius Reviewer
Advait Deshpande
Enterprise Analyst
Read full review
Cons
No answers on this topic
  • You can't allow users to create new repositories without them being full admins of a whole project
  • There's not a way to limit who can merge a pull request (e.g. allow only the author to merge) outside of branch permissions
  • Some settings like default reviewers can't be easily copied to different repositories (without setting default reviewers at the project level, which we don't want to do because a single project has multiple team's code under it)
Verified User
Anonymous
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
No answers on this topic
Because we're so locked in, it's likely we'll be using Bitbucket Server for a while, unfortunately.
Verified User
Anonymous
Read full review
Usability
No answers on this topic
The usability of its interface is pretty straight forward when it comes to creating projects and repositories, but when you have to dive into finer grained portions of the UI things can get tricky. If you are used to using tools like GitHub or Gitlab -- Bitbucket is just different enough to be a bother.
Verified User
Anonymous
Read full review
Support Rating
No answers on this topic
Never really needed any support as the application is very easy to set up and maintain. Any questions we had were well documented in their online documentation, and community forum.
Verified User
Anonymous
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
No answers on this topic
We migrated several of our applications to BitBucket from legacy Team Foundation Server, and the experience has been significantly better. It's easy to use and plenty flexible. Other solutions such as GitHub are also good, but we needed to keep everything on-prem due to constraints around our industry and company, though we are currently re-evaluating whether we can move to something cloud based in the future.
Verified User
Anonymous
Read full review
Return on Investment
No answers on this topic
  • In positive form, having Stash over not having it at all has provided us with a superior repository system over trying to push to some local server instance and manage branches/merging from our local machines.
  • There are no real negatives to using Stash, its only problem is that there are competitors out there that can offer additional features.
Verified User
Anonymous
Read full review
ScreenShots