TrustRadius

Altova RaptorXML Server vs. Microsoft Application Server (deprecated)

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Altova RaptorXML Server
Score 10.0 out of 10
N/A
Altova RaptorXML Server delivers validation and processing of XML, XBRL, and JSON data. RaptorXML Server is the third generation XML processor from Altova, recently optimized for parallel computing, based on the vendor's 15-year experience with XML and related standards.N/A
Microsoft Application Server (deprecated)
Score 8.0 out of 10
N/A
Application Server is an expanded server role in the Windows Server® 2008 operating system. It provided an integrated environment for deploying and running custom, server-based business applications. These applications respond to requests that arrive over the network from remote client computers or from other applications. Application Server is deprecated.N/A
Pricing
Altova RaptorXML ServerMicrosoft Application Server (deprecated)
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Altova RaptorXML ServerMicrosoft Application Server (deprecated)
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details——
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Altova RaptorXML ServerMicrosoft Application Server (deprecated)
Considered Both Products
Altova RaptorXML Server

No answer on this topic

Microsoft Application Server (deprecated)
Aurpa Fiza | TrustRadius Reviewer
Aurpa Fiza
Mapple Ltd
Chose Microsoft Application Server (deprecated)
We did choose because of its dependability, speed, complex environment support, and ease of use. Microsoft Application Server is cheaper than IBM WebSphere Application Server and faster than WebSphere. Microsoft Application Server is a close competitor in terms of features, but …
Verified User
Anonymous
Chose Microsoft Application Server (deprecated)
Microsoft Application Server has stood out to me because it has been so easy to use and utilize for our organization. I was not involved in the integration but being a user I can say that it has made a huge impact to how we access and utilize our databases. I have found that …
Verified User
Anonymous
Chose Microsoft Application Server (deprecated)
Microsoft Application Server was cheaper then what IBM Websphere Application Server would have cost us. Also, our legacy applications run much faster on MS Application Server.
Verified User
Anonymous
Chose Microsoft Application Server (deprecated)
We chose MS Application Server since it's fast and reliable and support complex environments and it's simple to set up and get running.
Verified User
Anonymous
Chose Microsoft Application Server (deprecated)
Too complex to setup and maintain. It also lacks enterprise-level SLA and support that Microsoft provides.
Verified User
Anonymous
Chose Microsoft Application Server (deprecated)
It has a similar feature to what Microsoft Application Server has but at a greater cost and also having to deal with another vendor when we could use a full Microsoft Stack for better training and support.
Verified User
Anonymous
Chose Microsoft Application Server (deprecated)
It is the only one we tested so far.
Frances LeClair | TrustRadius Reviewer
Frances LeClair
Finance Specialist
Chose Microsoft Application Server (deprecated)
This server is much more efficient and easy to use. The IBM we previously had was unreliable and required a lot of maintenance time.
Features
Altova RaptorXML ServerMicrosoft Application Server (deprecated)
Application Servers
Comparison of Application Servers features of Product A and Product B
Altova RaptorXML Server
-
Ratings
Microsoft Application Server (deprecated)
8.0
Ratings
1% above category average
IDE support00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Security management00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Administration and management00 Ratings7.00 Ratings
Application server performance00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Installation00 Ratings7.00 Ratings
Open-source standards compliance00 Ratings7.00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Altova RaptorXML ServerMicrosoft Application Server (deprecated)
Small Businesses
NGINX
NGINX
Score 9.2 out of 10
NGINX
NGINX
Score 9.2 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
NGINX
NGINX
Score 9.2 out of 10
NGINX
NGINX
Score 9.2 out of 10
Enterprises
NGINX
NGINX
Score 9.2 out of 10
NGINX
NGINX
Score 9.2 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Altova RaptorXML ServerMicrosoft Application Server (deprecated)
Likelihood to Recommend
-
(0 ratings)
9.0
(0 ratings)
Usability
-
(0 ratings)
10.0
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
-
(0 ratings)
9.0
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Altova RaptorXML ServerMicrosoft Application Server (deprecated)
Likelihood to Recommend
No answers on this topic
Regardless of the environment, Microsoft Application Server is used to manage internal applications. Installing legacy software on the computers of end-users is a cinch with this solution. It provides a central location for updating and managing legacy applications. It is less valuable if you're using only web-based and cloud-based apps.
Aurpa Fiza | TrustRadius Reviewer
Aurpa Fiza
Mapple Ltd
Read full review
Pros
No answers on this topic
  • Microsoft Application Server has been very stable. We have had very few issues with downtime except for updates.
  • We now have a central location to manage and update our legacy apps without the need to install each app on each user's system.
  • Application performance is surprisingly very good and responsive even in bandwidth restricted environments.
Verified User
Anonymous
Read full review
Cons
No answers on this topic
  • Wished Microsoft would offer better support options that are cheaper.
  • Updates sometimes require restarts which cause downtime.
  • More support for 3rd part software vendors.
Verified User
Anonymous
Read full review
Usability
No answers on this topic
I have found Microsoft Application Server to be incredibly easy to use. I have used dozens of similar programs and have always struggled to navigate through all the functions. So far I have been able to adapt and learn this software with ease. I rarely run into a problem that I wasn’t easily able to move forward on with a few tips.
Verified User
Anonymous
Read full review
Support Rating
No answers on this topic
MS Application Server has been great for our company it has enabled us to free up IT staff and lowered the maintenance costs of our internal application maintenance.
Verified User
Anonymous
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
No answers on this topic
Microsoft Application Server has stood out to me because it has been so easy to use and utilize for our organization. I was not involved in the integration but being a user I can say that it has made a huge impact to how we access and utilize our databases. I have found that using Microsoft Application Server has increased my productivity. I spend less time navigating and waiting for things to load.
Verified User
Anonymous
Read full review
Return on Investment
No answers on this topic
  • MS Application Server has been great for our ROI since it has reduced dedicating IT resources to maintaining legacy applications on end-users systems.
  • We have been able to have a central location for all our legacy and on-prem applications.
  • Our IT operations have been able to greatly improve efficiencies.
Verified User
Anonymous
Read full review
ScreenShots