Amazon Athena vs. Google BigLake

Best suited for analyzing huge amounts of data by just querying on Amazon Athena. Amazon Athena is also best to integrate with Amazon Quickight for visualization and reporting of data. Easy to work with CSV, JSON, and columnar data formats like Parquet, and ORC. Less appropriate to work with AVRO data format and also stored procedures are not supported in Amazon Athena. The size of a single row is also limited to 32 MB.

Incentivized

• Load Balance traffic analysis
• Big data report generation
• Micro services pattern query analysis

Incentivized

• Every dialect of SQL has some missing functions. I wish there was automated GROUP BY options here.
• There are connection problems back to Power BI occasionally.
• If you don't watch certain queries, it's possible that it takes a long time to run and charges you a lot of money.

Incentivized

Easy to use. Scalable. Gets the job of data warehousing setup done. Using the datalake on S3 has become super convenient.

Incentivized

Amazon Athena, a product from Amazon, competes with offerings from Google and Microsoft. Overall, I think your database choice depends on some of the other applications you are running at your company. For example, if you are using Microsoft Power BI for reporting needs, you might want to consider going the Azure route.

Incentivized

• It's easy to store and query data on S3. Multiple teams can query the same data to generate their reports. It removes the need for a full-fledged data warehouse for a startup. Saves costs.
• Improved team efficiency on monitoring user activities by easy logging and reporting.
• As the dataset gets heavier on S3, one needs to understand partitioning and that leads to the requirement of expertise.

Incentivized