TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    Amazon Aurora

    Score8.9 out of 10
    N/AAmazon Aurora is a global-scale relational database service built for the cloud with full MySQL and PostgreSQL compatibility.N/A
    Pricing
    Amazon Aurora
    Editions & Modules
    No answers on this topic
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    Amazon Aurora
    Free Trial
    No
    Free/Freemium Version
    No
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    No
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup fee
    Additional Details—
    More Pricing Information
    Community Pulse
    Amazon Aurora
    Considered Both Products
    Amazon AWS
    Chose Amazon Aurora
    Easier to setup, more configuration available, faster
    Incentivized
    Chose Amazon Aurora
    SQL Server requires a license, and it's another hectic our organization did not want to go with.
    Incentivized
    Chose Amazon Aurora
    Both Acquia Digital Experience Platform and Amazon Aurora use MySQL and PostgreSQL. Acquia of course has more compatibility with other database system like MariaDB. But Amazon Aurora provides maximum 100GB for a single subscription and in subscription we can have multiple …
    Incentivized
    Chose Amazon Aurora
    Aurora offers automatic scaling for both read and write operations. While Azure does provide that option too, the easy of using Aurora and higher. Also, Aurora has a very high availability too.
    Incentivized
    Chose Amazon Aurora
    They're all great products to use and it really varies on your business use case. We picked Amazon Aurora because of its high availability support and scales very well
    Incentivized
    Chose Amazon Aurora
    Just about the same. We use Azure SQL for some of our larger projects.
    Incentivized
    Chose Amazon Aurora
    We selected Aurora for the possibility of both MySQL and PostgreSQL.
    Incentivized
    Chose Amazon Aurora
    MongoDB is also powerful and efficient with a large amount of data, well RavenDB is much powerful than Mongo, and has more facilities which I like and is better than Mongo. But, Amazon Aurora is much more powerful and confidential data management system, having a cool …
    Incentivized
    Chose Amazon Aurora
    All those products are very similar. the difference is the interface, the support and the API available for deploy the service.
    The main difference is cost
    Incentivized
    Chose Amazon Aurora
    .
    Incentivized
    Chose Amazon Aurora
    Simple and scalable
    Incentivized
    Chose Amazon Aurora
    I have selected because of its in built security feature which makes my data secure and also have an ability to create backup automatically. It is a fully managed relation database engine that is compatible with MySql and PostgreSQL. It has server less computing.
    Incentivized
    Chose Amazon Aurora
    Fully managed
    cost effective
    backups
    Incentivized
    Chose Amazon Aurora
    In my opinion, much better and is also more cost effective based on other products we've reviewed. We also utilize other products from AWS and it makes a perfect fit for not only our environment but the clients we work with as well.
    Incentivized
    Chose Amazon Aurora
    In my opinion, Amazon Aurora has all of the advantages of Amazon RDS for MySQL, with additional performance benefits.
    Incentivized
    Chose Amazon Aurora
    Aurora vs Athena: Aurora provided MySQL/Postgres/MariaDB as DB engine whereas Athena provides SQL interface over data stored in S3 as datalake. Aurora has high performance compared to Athena.

    Aurora vs Redshift:- Different Architectures. Redshift is faster as its engine is a …
    Incentivized
    Chose Amazon Aurora
    • Performance and Scalability: If an organization requires high performance and the ability to scale seamlessly to handle varying workloads, Amazon Aurora's architecture is well-suited for these needs.
    • High Availability: Organizations that prioritize uptime and require automatic …
    Incentivized
    Chose Amazon Aurora
    I wish Amazon Aurora was compatible with more than just PostgreSQL and MySQL.
    Mongodb
    Incentivized
    Chose Amazon Aurora
    Microsoft Azure SQL Database
    Incentivized
    Chose Amazon Aurora
    Because most of our resources were already deployed within our AWS account, we wanted to have everything under the same umbrella. Moreover, AWS workload identity layer was crucial in providing passwordless authentication to our Aurora endpoints.
    Incentivized
    Chose Amazon Aurora
    Each AWS service is best in its own way. Aurora is best in relational database. Codebuild is best when building and testing the application in SDLC and AWS CodePipeline is another solution for CI CD pipeline in Agile.
    Incentivized
    Chose Amazon Aurora
    The scalability, availability, and the iOPS are clearly the winners for Aurora. Other offerings are more managed solutions where again the focus shifts to the resources rather than the product.
    Incentivized
    Chose Amazon Aurora
    Aurora offers an easy-to-use MySQL or Postgres compatible database that is cloud native. This is great for LAMP / LAPP stack applications as it shortens development time considerably as you no longer need to spend time setting up databases, setting up database backups, and so …
    Incentivized
    Chose Amazon Aurora
    Amazon Aurora s strength is in the cost as it is economical, secure, and offers a huge storage space of 128 terabytes. Compared to its competitors, Aurora has a nice console offering ease of use through the click, copy and drag options. As per the requirement, the database can …
    Incentivized
    Chose Amazon Aurora
    Aurora vs RDS: Better replication and performance of Aurora as compared to RDS. Almost zero replication lag in most cases which is a big improvement over RDS. Scaling, maintenance, and overall ROI are higher in Aurora.

    Aurora vs Percona: Aurora comes well integrated with the …
    Incentivized
    Key User Insights
    Would buy again
    No answers on this topic
    Delivers good value for the price
    No answers on this topic
    Happy with the feature set
    No answers on this topic
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    No answers on this topic
    Implementation went as expected
    No answers on this topic
    Features
    Amazon Aurora
    Database-as-a-Service
    Comparison of Database-as-a-Service features of Amazon Aurora
    Feature
    Amazon Aurora
    9.2
    27 Ratings
    Automatic software patching9.027 Ratings
    Database scalability9.527 Ratings
    Automated backups9.626 Ratings
    Database security provisions9.225 Ratings
    Monitoring and metrics8.726 Ratings
    Automatic host deployment9.124 Ratings
    User Ratings
    Amazon Aurora
    Likelihood to Recommend
    9.1
    (45 ratings)
    Likelihood to Renew
    9.9
    (4 ratings)
    Usability
    9.1
    (3 ratings)
    Availability
    9.7
    (24 ratings)
    Support Rating
    1.0
    (5 ratings)
    Online Training
    8.0
    (1 ratings)
    Implementation Rating
    10.0
    (1 ratings)