Amazon CloudFront

Amazon CloudFront

111 Reviews and Ratings

Overview
Product	Rating	Most Used By	Product Summary	Starting Price
Amazon CloudFront	Score6.8 out of 10	N/A	CloudFront is the content delivery network (CDN) from Amazon Web Services.	$0.02

Pricing

Amazon CloudFront

Over 5PB: $0.02
Next 524TB: $0.03
Next 4PB: $0.03
Next 350TB: $0.04
Next 100TB: $0.06
Next 40TB: $0.08
First 10TB: $0.09

Pricing Offerings
Amazon CloudFront
Free Trial
No
Free/Freemium Version
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No

No setup fee

—

Community Pulse
Key User Insights
	Amazon CloudFront
Considered Both Products	Amazon AWS Faisal Shaikh Leade Developer in Information Technology at Seeken Enterprise Private Limited (E-Learning, 11-50 employees) Chose Amazon CloudFront CloudFronts beats everyone with their free 1 TB monthly bandwidth usage. And if we compare speed and latency of CloudFront with the BunnyCDN and CloudFare, CloudFront is was faster than them. With CloudFront, we get options like signed URL and signed cookies which prevent our … Incentivized Helpful? Gnanasekar Mani Senior Software Engineer in Information Technology at Brillio (Information Technology & Services, 1001-5000 employees) Chose Amazon CloudFront Have used the IBM Cloud Content Delivery Network for a very short time span like a couple of weeks. Both the setup as well as interactions with other services are a little complicated or not straightforward when compared to AWS. Also, IBM cloud has less number of edge locations … Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Chose Amazon CloudFront Cloudfront is one of the oldest CDN with presence in a lot of locations. This really helps in making the content load faster in all the locations globally. Other products have also caught up with this but still AWS has a lot of other services which can be connected with the CDN … Incentivized Helpful? Ali Kazempour Information Technology Manager in Information Technology at Azerex (Information Technology & Services, 1-10 employees) Chose Amazon CloudFront Amazon has always been creative and leading, and I have been using its services for years. They are very reassuring and have fast and responsive support--you can call them from any time zone to respond quickly. High security on servers, open hands on changes, and increasing and … Incentivized Helpful? Carlos Becerra Senior Software Engineer & Project Manager in Information Technology at WiFiesta Inc (Information Technology and Services, 11-50 employees) Chose Amazon CloudFront We use a great set of AWS features and it was easy to implement Amazon CloudFront. It fulfills our needs, and the learning curve was not difficult given the AWS configuration we already have. Incentivized Helpful? Fortune Nwaiwu Business Analyst in Information Technology at Rothbadi & Co (Information Technology & Services, 501-1000 employees) Chose Amazon CloudFront I find Amazon CloudFront to be better suited to my business needs in terms of robustness, agility and scalalbility of the solution. Incentivized Helpful? Bob Smith Co-Founder, President, CTO in Corporate at Infofree Sales Leads \| Business Lists \| Person Search & CRM101 (Computer Software, 1-10 employees) Chose Amazon CloudFront Because our products are built and utilize other AWS features, it was easiest to implement Amazon CloudFront based on initial environment configuration. Other CDNs were easier to get started with but required manual intervention to update overtime. Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Chose Amazon CloudFront If you are using other AWS services, then no other CDN can compete with AWS CloudFront. Its integration with WAF, Route53, ACM allow it to provide a whole ecosystem for building websites and using a CDN. It gives developers access to inexpensive, pay-as-you-go pricing. … Incentivized Helpful? Matthew Gardner Co-Founder at RouteThis (Computer Software, 11-50 employees) Chose Amazon CloudFront We ended up selecting CloudFront because we were already using an Amazon stack. To be honest, since we were already in the ecosystem there was little reason to deviate once we saw pricing was comparable. Incentivized Helpful? Chris Barretto CTO in Engineering at Cureus (Publishing, 1-10 employees) Chose Amazon CloudFront We went with CloudFront primarily because we have all of our other services with Amazon already. We are using EC2, S3, Elastic Beanstalk, and are very familiar with the interface. It did not disappoint. Incentivized Helpful? Joshua Dickson Director of Engineering in Engineering at NorthOut (Computer Software, 51-200 employees) Chose Amazon CloudFront CloudFront is well-suited for a particular use case with its native tie-ins to other Amazon/AWS services, like S3. If choosing from a platform-specific CDN, we tend to go with whichever CDN is available for use on that platform (e.g. Google or Azure). In rare cases we might … Incentivized Helpful? Andrew Raines Backend Software Engineer in Information Technology at 10 Digital Media Limited (Sports, 1-10 employees) Chose Amazon CloudFront CloudFlare is another great CDN service. It comes with a lot of things set up of the box for you, and gives you a basic and reasonable set up straight away. It also has a free-tier for smaller sites. CloudFlare doesn't quite have the same level of configurability, however. … Incentivized Helpful? Ashish Agarwal Software Engineer in Engineering at Genpact (Information Technology and Services, 1001-5000 employees) Chose Amazon CloudFront Amazon CloudFront free Tier allows up to 50 GB of data transfer per month which is not there in any of the above. Amazon CloudFront provides detailed reporting around the most frequently used objects, monitoring and usage charts. Amazon CloudFront is suitable to help you … Incentivized Helpful?
	Would buy again
	No answers on this topic
	Delivers good value for the price
	No answers on this topic
	Happy with the feature set
	No answers on this topic
	Lived up to sales and marketing promises
	No answers on this topic
	Implementation went as expected
No answers on this topic

User Ratings
	Amazon CloudFront
Likelihood to Recommend	9.0 (17 ratings)
Usability	9.0 (1 ratings)
Support Rating	7.0 (4 ratings)