Amazon CodeGuru vs. Checkmarx

Amazon CodeGuru

Amazon CodeGuru

7 Reviews and Ratings

Checkmarx

Checkmarx

21 Reviews and Ratings

Overview
Product	Rating	Most Used By	Product Summary	Starting Price
Amazon CodeGuru	Score 7.8 out of 10	N/A	Amazon CodeGuru is a developer tool that provides recommendations for improving code quality and identifying an application’s most expensive lines of code, performing automated code reviews and application performance recommendations. When Amazon CodeGuru Reviewer is enabled on a source code repository, users can set it up to perform a scan for every source code pull request made on that repository. When Amazon CodeGuru Profiler is enabled to profile an application, it samples the CPU…	N/A
Checkmarx	Score 9.1 out of 10	N/A	Checkmarx, an Israeli headquartered company with US offices, provides a suite of application security software delivered via the Checkmarx Software Security Platform. Individual modules and capabilities include Checkmarx Static Application Security Testing, Checkmarx Software Composition Analysis, Checkmarx Interactive Application Security Testing (CxIAST)	N/A

Pricing

Amazon CodeGuru

Checkmarx

Editions & Modules

No answers on this topic

No answers on this topic

Offerings

Pricing Offerings
Amazon CodeGuru	Checkmarx
Free Trial
No	No
Free/Freemium Version
No	No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No	No

Entry-level Setup Fee

No setup fee

No setup fee

Additional Details

—

—

More Pricing Information

Community Pulse
	Amazon CodeGuru	Checkmarx
Considered Both Products	Amazon CodeGuru No answer on this topic	Checkmarx Verified User Anonymous Chose Checkmarx Checkmarx is easier to integrate with development tools and gives quick feedback during coding, which is helpful for developers. Veracode is more focused on scanning and reporting for compliance, but it’s more complex to set up. We chose Checkmarx because it fits better into … Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose Checkmarx We actually use Checkmarx along with the other tools. However, the reason we chose Checkmarx is its wide support for languages and useful fix recommendations. The flowcharts help better understand the data flow and give a clear picture of what needs to be fixed and how. Also, … Incentivized Helpful?

Best Alternatives
	Amazon CodeGuru	Checkmarx
Small Businesses	PyCharm Score 9.3 out of 10	GitLab Score 8.7 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies	PyCharm Score 9.3 out of 10	Veracode Score 8.7 out of 10
Enterprises	PyCharm Score 9.3 out of 10	Veracode Score 8.7 out of 10
All Alternatives	View all alternatives	View all alternatives

User Ratings
	Amazon CodeGuru	Checkmarx
Likelihood to Recommend	10.0 (0 ratings)	9.0 (0 ratings)
Usability	- (0 ratings)	7.0 (0 ratings)

User Testimonials
	Amazon CodeGuru	Checkmarx
Likelihood to Recommend	Amazon CodeGuru can be really useful to any company that develops applications and make it possible to integrate with your cloud infrastructure (AWS).In general, we can notice that the codes have been more clean and trustable. Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review	If you are going with SAST process or want to improve overall security posture then go for it like integrating it with post deployment steps. If you are more concerned about proactive controls better choose other options such as pee-commit hooks and CI security. Also choose other tools for DAST and API scans. Incentivized Abhineet Sagar DevSecOps Engineer II Read full review
Pros	No answers on this topic	Supports a large number of languages Finds a large variety of potential risks Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review
Cons	They could have more suggestions but it's part of the maturation process Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review	DAST capability can be the one where it does not support native use case of using OTP based arch API Scanning is something that lacks a bit due to not much customizations Branch wise reports for SAST is not available Incentivized Abhineet Sagar DevSecOps Engineer II Read full review
Usability	No answers on this topic	Checkmarx's usability is generally good, but it can be a bit complex for new users. The interface may take some time to get used to, especially for those unfamiliar with security tools. Once you become familiar with it, it’s effective and integrates well into development workflows. Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review
Alternatives Considered	No answers on this topic	Checkmarx is easier to integrate with development tools and gives quick feedback during coding, which is helpful for developers. Veracode is more focused on scanning and reporting for compliance, but it’s more complex to set up. We chose Checkmarx because it fits better into our development process, offering faster scans and more useful suggestions for fixing problems Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review
Return on Investment	We have been much more productive and producing codes with less bugs and more trustable Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review	Great diversity of vulnerabilities covered. Quicker scans They are feature rich compared to other tools I used in the past. Dashboards are not customizable enough. High number of false positives take up time and sometimes make our report look bad. Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review
ScreenShots