Amazon DynamoDB vs. Amazon Elastic Block Store (EBS)

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Amazon DynamoDB
Score 8.5 out of 10
N/A
Amazon DynamoDB is a cloud-native, NoSQL, serverless database service.
$0
capacity unit per hour
Amazon Elastic Block Store (EBS)
Score 9.3 out of 10
N/A
Amazon Elastic Block Store (EBS) from AWS is designed for application workloads that benefit from fine tuning for performance, cost and capacity. Typical use cases include Big Data analytics engines (like the Hadoop/HDFS ecosystem and Amazon EMR clusters), relational and NoSQL databases (like Microsoft SQL Server and MySQL or Cassandra and MongoDB), stream and log processing applications (like Kafka and Splunk), and data warehousing applications (like Vertica and Teradata).N/A
Pricing
Amazon DynamoDBAmazon Elastic Block Store (EBS)
Editions & Modules
Provisioned - Read Operation
$0.00013
capacity unit per hour
Provisioned - Write Operation
$0.00065
capacity unit per hour
Provisioned - Global Tables
$0.000975
per Read Capacity
On-Demand Streams
$0.02
per 100,000 read operations
Provisioned - Streams
$0.02
per 100,000 read operations
On-Demand Data Requests Outside AWS Regions
$0.09
per GB
Provisioned - Data Requests Outside AWS Regions
$0.09
per GB
On-Demand Snapshot
$0.10
per GB per month
Provisioned - Snapshot
$0.10
per GB per month
On-Demand Restoring a Backup
$0.15
per GB
Provisioned - Restoring a Backup
$0.15
per GB
On-Demand Point-in-Time Recovery
$0.20
per GB per month
Provisioned - Point-in-Time Recovery
$0.20
per GB per month
On-Demand Read Operation
$0.25
per million requests
On-Demand Data Stored
$0.25
per GB per month
Provisioned - Data Stored
$0.25
per GB per month
On-Demand - Write Operation
$1.25
per million requests
On-Demand Global Tables
$1.875
per million write operations replicated
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Amazon DynamoDBAmazon Elastic Block Store (EBS)
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Amazon DynamoDBAmazon Elastic Block Store (EBS)
Considered Both Products
Amazon DynamoDB
Chose Amazon DynamoDB
For our use case, we needed a noSQL that would work with AWS Lambdas of specific parts of the internal web applications. We optimized billing and uses , diversified databases for various parts; so it’s not very expensive.
Chose Amazon DynamoDB
i think both depends on usuability and app requirement
Chose Amazon DynamoDB
Other all SQL Databases are based on the traditional Schema Structure and Amazon DynamoDB is NoSQL so you don't need to generate the SQL Schemas. You can store the data whatever you want, whenever you want. You can store data in structured or non-structured any way you want. If …
Chose Amazon DynamoDB
Both are Nosql db but when it comes to scalability i think, MongoDB is no where close to Amazon DynamoDB
Chose Amazon DynamoDB
Performance at high scales is better and the cost at high scales is less. If one has a ton of data generated and has to work their way through it, I think Amazon DynamoDB should the go-to database. There are no compromises when it comes to performance at a huge scale. With any …
Chose Amazon DynamoDB
MongoDB was basically the first approach we used but because there was concern that some data may miss we were reluctant to use it. Oracle Database and SQL Server was our second approach but it was throttling so in last we tested out Amazon DynamoDB and it met our requirement.
Chose Amazon DynamoDB
The Amazon Web Services managed Amazon DynamoDB has excellent features which makes it stand out from all the others in market right now. The management ease it offers is far superior than its competitors and on top of that the on-demand pricing model is an advantage which works …
Chose Amazon DynamoDB
MongoDB has some performance issues and can get corrupted from time to time and has needed to be rebuilt. We have not had that experience while using DynamoDB.
Chose Amazon DynamoDB
Compare to other products its so easier to set up, meeting all of our business requirements and easy usable, highly efficient and scalable.
Chose Amazon DynamoDB
high scalability #single-digit latency. #so much flexile. #very easy to use. # low maintenance.#GLobal Access
Chose Amazon DynamoDB
Amazon DynamoDB seems to be more cost effective and easy to integrate with other aws services.
Chose Amazon DynamoDB
Amazon DynamoDB supports larger throughput, with better SLA, also, we are considering unstructured data, so Amazon DynamoDB has become the final decision
Chose Amazon DynamoDB
The only thing that can be compared to DynamoDB from the selected services can be Aurora. It is just that we use Aurora for High-Performance requirements as it can be 6 times faster than normal RDS DB. Both of them have served as well in the required scenario and we are very …
Chose Amazon DynamoDB
Haven't had a chance to use this up to an extent to be compared to DynamoDB.
Chose Amazon DynamoDB
DynamoDB offers strong consistency, more fine-grained control over read and write capacities, and integrates seamlessly with other AWS services.
DynamoDB is designed for horizontal scalability and high throughput, making it a better choice for applications with rapidly changing …
Chose Amazon DynamoDB
AWS handles hardware provisioning, data recovery, fault tolerance, patching, and database upgrades for DynamoDB since it is a fully managed database service. Businesses can then concentrate on other aspects of their operations, including product development or customer service, …
Chose Amazon DynamoDB
The automation is much more subtle and it performs way better for internet-scale applications. No matter the number of connections, the performance doesn't dip even a bit.
Chose Amazon DynamoDB
cosmos user interface is not that much good in comparision with dynamodb also the response time compares with dynamodb is high.
Chose Amazon DynamoDB
DynamoDB's scalability is more automated and effortless, making it easier to handle rapid growth. Other tools require more manual configuration while DynamoDB simplifies database administration. Also, DynamoDB provides strong consistency while other tools like MongoDB and …
Chose Amazon DynamoDB
We are always assembling our solutions on AWS and DynamoDB is a better fit for us because of its simplicity.
DynamoDB has its ow sets of triggers that make this an integrated solution on AWS.
Besides, we wanted to use a key-value solution for our simple edge DB, and we didn't …
Chose Amazon DynamoDB
DynamoDB is slightly different than both the above-stated DBs, with RDS being a relational database and Redshift being a data warehouse used for heavier jobs and analytics and vast data. DynamoDB lies in between both, with it being a no SQL base that can relatively store …
Chose Amazon DynamoDB
Lesser flexibility but better performance, and more predictable development support are the key points where Amazon DynamoDB comes out on top, when compared to MongoDB.
Chose Amazon DynamoDB
Mongo services are outside of our Vpc and are on a different network. Since most of our infra is on AWS, dynamo by AWS was a natural choice. Most of our engineers are familiar with AWS sdk and the console so that brought in a much smaller learning curve for our engineering team
Chose Amazon DynamoDB
These other products don't offer the flexible database features that DynamoDB has.
Amazon Elastic Block Store (EBS)
Chose Amazon Elastic Block Store (EBS)
Amazon S3 is an object based storage and not a block based storage. It can be mounted on a volume but cannot be used as a boot volume. Moreover, it is not as fast as EBS. S3 is generally used to store objects for long term storage and not as a persistent storage on an EC2 …
Chose Amazon Elastic Block Store (EBS)
It is backed by most succesfull company in the field. They were one of the first to offer and we historically tied with Amazon Web Servieces product family. We appreciate their afforts and happy to serve our customers to implement their ideas in the cloud. Amazon Elastic Block …
Chose Amazon Elastic Block Store (EBS)
Volumes range from cost-effective dollar-per-GB to high performance with the fastest IOPS and throughput. You can change volume types, tune performance, or increase volume size without disrupting your critical applications. EBS volumes are replicated within an Availability Zone …
Chose Amazon Elastic Block Store (EBS)
Amazon Elastic Block Store (EBS) is a better option than Microsoft Azure Disk Storage for customers that require more volume-type options and cost-effective data archiving.
Chose Amazon Elastic Block Store (EBS)
Its comparable, but overall I think the user interface to manage Disk Block Storage is better in AWS compared to Google Cloud
Chose Amazon Elastic Block Store (EBS)
Amazon RDS uses Amazon Elastic Block Store storage, so you can get similar performance and not have to manage a database server if you were planning to use RDS with a database.
Chose Amazon Elastic Block Store (EBS)
EBS is easy to use and very cost efficient which helps in cost reduction of maintenance and data storage. AWS EBS is a highly available and durable storage as compared to others.
Chose Amazon Elastic Block Store (EBS)
I've only used Amazon Elastic Block Store (EBS) and Azure so far, but I prefer AWS Elastic Block Store because it offers more benefits than Azure, and I found it to be quite good and useful for data storing. At this moment, we are not looking for another hosting provider.
Chose Amazon Elastic Block Store (EBS)
This EBS has a good recovery system, So some distance I even have most effective used Amazon Elastic Block Store (EBS) and Azure however comparatively choose AWS elastic Block shop as its having extra benefits than Azure and I observed it pretty excellent and it helped plenty …
Chose Amazon Elastic Block Store (EBS)
Amazon Elastic Block Store is an excellent storage replication solution. It gives you a quick and simple way to get all the storage you need, and you may alter it if you need more or less storage for your projects.
Chose Amazon Elastic Block Store (EBS)
I favor AWS elastic Block store over Azure since it offers more benefits, and I found it to be pretty satisfying and useful for data storage. At this moment, we are not looking for another hosting provider.
Chose Amazon Elastic Block Store (EBS)
So far I have only used Amazon Elastic Block Store (EBS) and Azure but comparatively [I] prefer AWS elastic Block store as its having more advantages than Azure and I found it quite satisfactory and it helped a lot for information storage. We are not looking for any other …
Chose Amazon Elastic Block Store (EBS)
So far I have only used Amazon Elastic Block Store (EBS) and Azure but comparatively [I] prefer AWS elastic Block store as its having more advantages than Azure and I found it quite satisfactory and it helped a lot for information storage. We are not looking for any other …
Chose Amazon Elastic Block Store (EBS)
As of now, I have only used Amazon Elastic Block Store (EBS) it is well satisfactory and that helps a lot in storing information. We are not looking for any other service provider for storage as of now.
Chose Amazon Elastic Block Store (EBS)
Basically, we choose EBS because we are using AWS, we have already evaluated 3 cloud providers AWS, GCP, and azure. And we decided to use AWS because of some elements. Mostly because AWS has a native Linux operating system (amazon Linux).
Chose Amazon Elastic Block Store (EBS)
The reason I selected Amazon Elastic block store is because of their fast and quick response, a wide variety of services that can be easily available on a single platform. Easy integration with different platforms through APIs, security, pay as you go, service on demand, and …
Chose Amazon Elastic Block Store (EBS)
Amazon Elastic Block Store is a very good scaling solution for storage if you are invested in AWS. It provides a quick and easy way for you to easily get all the storage you need at and adjust it if you need more or less storage for your projects.
Features
Amazon DynamoDBAmazon Elastic Block Store (EBS)
NoSQL Databases
Comparison of NoSQL Databases features of Product A and Product B
Amazon DynamoDB
9.2
Ratings
4% above category average
Amazon Elastic Block Store (EBS)
-
Ratings
Performance9.30 Ratings00 Ratings
Availability9.50 Ratings00 Ratings
Concurrency9.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Security9.20 Ratings00 Ratings
Scalability9.40 Ratings00 Ratings
Data model flexibility8.20 Ratings00 Ratings
Deployment model flexibility10.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Amazon DynamoDBAmazon Elastic Block Store (EBS)
Small Businesses
IBM Cloudant
IBM Cloudant
Score 7.4 out of 10
Vultr
Vultr
Score 6.8 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
IBM Cloudant
IBM Cloudant
Score 7.4 out of 10
Pure Storage FlashArray
Pure Storage FlashArray
Score 10.0 out of 10
Enterprises
IBM Cloudant
IBM Cloudant
Score 7.4 out of 10
Pure Storage FlashArray
Pure Storage FlashArray
Score 10.0 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Amazon DynamoDBAmazon Elastic Block Store (EBS)
Likelihood to Recommend
8.9
(0 ratings)
9.1
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
10.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Usability
9.1
(0 ratings)
8.0
(0 ratings)
Performance
9.1
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
5.2
(0 ratings)
8.0
(0 ratings)
Product Scalability
9.1
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Amazon DynamoDBAmazon Elastic Block Store (EBS)
Likelihood to Recommend
It is useful use-case by use-case. For our use case, it was the best and easiest option for the integration as well as development side. It is serverless so no need of deployment and maintenance hustle. It is easy to scale up due to the same functionality. Supports AWS Security features and just a click away for enabling it so security is good.
Read full review
EBS is well-suited for use as a storage option for databases, including relational databases, NoSQL databases, and big data analytics databases. EBS can provide high IOPS (Input/Output Operations per Second) and low latency. EBS provides a high-availability storage solution, which ensures that your data is always available and accessible even in case of a single or multiple availability zone failures. EBS can also be replicated across multiple availability zones to ensure data durability. The scenario where I find it less appropriate is in terms of cost; EBS can be more expensive than other storage options, such as Amazon S3, especially for large amounts of data or for infrequently accessed data.
Read full review
Pros
  • It's very easy to get started, creating a table with a partition/sort key and you're on your way.
  • You can scale up and down your read/write IO as needed.
  • You can store structured and unstructured data.
  • It works great with Web Development as it's JSON based.
Read full review
  • Raw storage capacity attached to your instance operative system
  • Frequent data rewriting (mission critical for reporting)
  • Low latency connectivity (14 reporting subsidiaries in different time zones)
  • Videly spreaded for implementation
  • Fast accessible drive
  • Block storage are core for Java, Net mobile applications
Read full review
Cons
  • Cost model may not be easy to control and may lead to higher costs if not carefully planned
  • Indexing may be a cost culprit when not planned, because it's not included on the data costs
  • The Query Language may not fulfill everybody's expectations, as it has less features than those of competitors.
Read full review
  • EBS volume can be attached to only one EC2 instance at a time
  • The volumes are limited to the Availability zones of the instance they are attached to
  • The maximum size is 64TB. We have had usecases where we needed larger volume
  • The backup snapshots are stored on S3 and that's an additional cost.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
It's core to our business, we couldn't survive without it. We use it to drive everything from FTP logins to processing stories and delivering them to clients. It's reliable and easy to query from all of our pipeline services. Integration with things like AWS Lambda makes it easy to trigger events and run code whenever something changes in the database.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Usability
Functionally, DynamoDB has the features needed to use it. The interface is not as easy to use, which impacts its usability. Being familiar with AWS in general is helpful in understanding the interface, however it would be better if the interface more closely aligned with traditional tools for managing datastores.
Read full review
Amazon EBS is a great tool and fairly easy to use as long as you are familiar with the Amazon Web Service ecosystem. It allows a great way for you to move storage around easily and allows you to quickly provision storage as needed based on the business requirement. For us, it's easy to move between our EC2 images that had been linked with EBS storage between these Amazon accounts.
Read full review
Performance
While the actual performance of DynamoDB can vary based on workload and region, it is generally highly responsive and well-regarded for delivering low-latency access to data, making it a strong choice for applications with stringent performance requirements. Organizations often choose DynamoDB for its ability to provide a reliable and performant database service, particularly when combined with effective application design and optimization.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
I have not had to contact support for this service, however I have had to contact AWS for other services and their support has been good.
Read full review
The support for Amazon Elastic Block Store is great as long as you can articulate your needs. Like most tools, there may be some back and forth before you find a support person that is knowledgable in the tool and can provide you with necessary insights.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
For our use case, we needed a noSQL that would work with AWS Lambdas of specific parts of the internal web applications. We optimized billing and uses , diversified databases for various parts; so it’s not very expensive.
Read full review
Volumes range from cost-effective dollar-per-GB to high performance with the fastest IOPS and throughput. You can change volume types, tune performance, or increase volume size without disrupting your critical applications. EBS volumes are replicated within an Availability Zone (AZ) and can easily scale to petabytes of data. Build your SAN in the cloud for I/O-intensive applications. Run relational or NoSQL databases.
Read full review
Scalability
I have taken one point away due to its size limits. In case the application requires queries, it becomes really complicated to read and write data. When it comes to extremely large data sets such as the case in my company, a third-party logistics company, where huge amount of data is generated on a daily basis, even though the scalability is good, it becomes difficult to manage all the data due to limits.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Return on Investment
  • Businesses may only pay for the services they actually use thanks to DynamoDB's usage-based pricing approach.
  • AWS handles hardware provisioning, data recovery, fault tolerance, patching, and database upgrades for DynamoDB since it is a fully managed database service.
  • DynamoDB differs from conventional relational databases in terms of its data model, which might be difficult for developers accustomed to dealing with SQL-based systems.
Read full review
  • In terms of ROI, I found it's really cost-effective since maintenance cost is not there. No need to spend extra money on the procurement of hard drives
  • On demand feature of Ebs is quite effective when you require extra storage you can allocate and pay as per your need.
  • Accessibility from everywhere and deployment of it across different geographical location.
Read full review
ScreenShots

Amazon DynamoDB Screenshots

Screenshot of Amazon DynamoDB in the AWS Console