| Product | Rating | Most Used By | Product Summary | Starting Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
 Amazon DynamoDB | Score8.5 out of 10 | N/A | Amazon DynamoDB is a cloud-native, NoSQL, serverless database service. | $0 capacity unit per hour |
 CouchDB | Score6 out of 10 | N/A | Apache CouchDB is an HTTP + JSON document database with Map Reduce views and bi-directional replication. The Couch Replication Protocol is implemented in a variety of projects and products that span computing environments from globally distributed server-clusters, over mobile phones to web browsers. | N/A |
| Amazon DynamoDB | CouchDB | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Editions & Modules |
| No answers on this topic | ||||||||||||||
| Offerings |
| |||||||||||||||
| Entry-level Setup Fee | No setup fee | No setup fee | ||||||||||||||
| Additional Details | — | — | ||||||||||||||
| More Pricing Information | ||||||||||||||||
| Amazon DynamoDB | CouchDB | |
|---|---|---|
| Considered Both Products | Chose Amazon DynamoDB Main advantage of DynamoDB is Amazon's offering as SaaS. This removes the need for managing the database. DynamoDB is well suited for querying simple and flat JSON objects. Compared to PostgresSQL, I would pick Postgres over Dynamo considering that Postgres is very mature and … Independently Invited by TrustRadius A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info | Chose CouchDB Compared to MongoDB, CouchDB's Map-Reduce paradigm poses a steeper learning curve for SQL users. However, CouchDB's master-master replication is an advantage of implementing a load-balanced solution. Even though, currently, CouchDB has strong community support, as an open … Independently Invited by TrustRadius A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info |
| Key User Insights | ||
| Would buy again | ||
No answers on this topic | No answers on this topic | |
| Delivers good value for the price | ||
No answers on this topic | No answers on this topic | |
| Happy with the feature set | ||
No answers on this topic | No answers on this topic | |
| Lived up to sales and marketing promises | ||
No answers on this topic | No answers on this topic | |
| Implementation went as expected | ||
No answers on this topic | No answers on this topic | |
| Amazon DynamoDB | CouchDB | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NoSQL Databases |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Amazon DynamoDB | CouchDB | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend | 8.9 | 9.0 |
| Likelihood to Renew | 10.0 | 9.0 |
| Usability | 9.1 | 8.0 |
| Performance | 9.1 | - |
| Support Rating | 5.2 | - |
| Implementation Rating | - | 9.0 |
| Product Scalability | 9.1 | - |
