Amazon ElastiCache

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Amazon ElastiCache
Score 7.8 out of 10
N/A
Amazon ElastiCache offers fully managed Redis and Memcached.N/A
Pricing
Amazon ElastiCache
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Amazon ElastiCache
Free Trial
No
Free/Freemium Version
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Amazon ElastiCache
Considered Both Products
Amazon ElastiCache
Chose Amazon ElastiCache
In order to save some login information, notification alert, and some other critical data, we used DynamoDB instead of ElastiCache due to low cost and data are more persistent as compared with ElastiCache.
Chose Amazon ElastiCache
Amazon Elasticache is better than Amazon Elasticsearch and Amazon SQS as the former is good for dumping a lot of data for searching purposes later on and the latter is good for maintaining a message bus whereas Amazon ElastiCache purely works as a caching data store to provide …
User Ratings
Amazon ElastiCache
Likelihood to Recommend
8.0
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Amazon ElastiCache
Likelihood to Recommend
Amazon ElastiCache is a great managed Redis or Memcached service. ElastiCache with the Redis engine is great for caching expensive responses or queries. It is great if you need a distributed mutex. It is great as a message broker. If you need Redis but don't have the resources to manage it yourself, consider ElastiCache. It may not be economical for very large scale installations, however.
Read full review
Pros
  • Easy to set up and zero maintenance
  • Relatively low cost
  • Drop-in replacement for Memcached service
Read full review
Cons
  • Client could be added on console to access the data stores.
  • More integrations with other AWS services.
  • Infrastructure uptime can be increase.
  • Cost should be reduced.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Amazon Elasticache is better than Amazon Elasticsearch and Amazon SQS as the former is good for dumping a lot of data for searching purposes later on and the latter is good for maintaining a message bus whereas Amazon ElastiCache purely works as a caching data store to provide faster data access. AWS DynamoDB is a good alternative if you're looking for a serverless solution as in Amazon ElastiCache, we get to see instances while in AWS DynamoDB, we can simply access the data without the need of bringing up a server.
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • memcached should be improved like Redis
  • need serverless with Aurora RDS
  • cost should be decreased
Read full review
ScreenShots