To help advertisers understand how their marketing performs across media such as search, display, video, and audio, Amazon Advertising is introducing Amazon Marketing Cloud (AMC)—a holistic measurement and analytics solution currently in beta for eligible advertisers. AMC is built on Amazon Web Services (AWS).
N/A
Piano Analytics
Score 8.0 out of 10
Mid-Size Companies (51-1,000 employees)
Piano Analytics, formerly AT Internet, provides digital analytics to help customers measure their audience, optimise their digital performance and create value. From data collection to exploration, activation, and the sharing of actionable insights, the Piano Analytics Suite is designed to provide reliable high-quality data to enhance decision-making company-wide. Adapted to e-commerce, media, finance/banking, and corporate websites & mobile apps, the vendor promises an easy-to-use solution…
$430
per server calls consumption
Pricing
Amazon Marketing Cloud
Piano Analytics
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
Business
$430
per server calls consumption
Premium
Contact us
per server calls consumption
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Amazon Marketing Cloud
Piano Analytics
Free Trial
No
Yes
Free/Freemium Version
No
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No
No
Entry-level Setup Fee
No setup fee
$430 per server calls consumption
Additional Details
—
—
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Amazon Marketing Cloud
Piano Analytics
Considered Both Products
Amazon Marketing Cloud
Verified User
Anonymous
Chose Amazon Marketing Cloud
I have compared Google Ads Data Hub and Meta's Advanced Analytics with Amazon Marketing Cloud. Amazon Marketing Cloud is most notable for its insights into the deep Amazon ecosystem, Google for cross-platform tracking, and Meta for extensive social engagement analysis. AMC's …
Since I haven't used other marketing analytics software, Amazon Marketing Cloud might seem like the standard. While it provides deep insights, its usability could be improved with simpler dashboards, automation, and real-time data. Comparing it with other tools in the future …
When we thought of having snowflake, We came up with differnt infra requirements which we again should go with IaaS part in AWS. We got Amazon Marketing Cloud bundle with infra requirements whcih is easy to mange and cost effective when compared with other product. Also we felt …
AT Internet is more comprehensive and provides a lot of filters in easy ways, especially for websites that has various subdomains and pages used for different purposes. Also, the trend analysis and the ability to create reports and design them the way we want is very, very …
I use AT Internet and Google Analytics together so I didn't have to choose between the two tools. In fact, it's a choice that is made at the group level.
We have historically used both tools for different needs. AT Internet was chosen in particular for its respect for privacy …
I have not tested any other product of this type, AT Internet was chosen by the company because it excels in its field and seems to be among the best in its class
To be very honest, it was a decision made before I joined the company. I think that if I had the choice, I would prefer to use Google Analytics from a media perspective. However, it is also a question of budget as Google Analytics Premium is more expensive.
According to Gartner, AT Internet is one of the best web analytics solutions on the market. Adding to this, we wanted to make sure that we get a secure solution in terms of legal issues. Furthermore, when considering the pricing of AT Internet, this solution is quite …
For our department we prefer to use AT Internet because we have been trained and we know the tool well. However when we create new ephemeral mini sites (which is quite rare) we may have to use Google Analytics because the solution seems simpler and faster to integrate for our …
AT Internet has many advantages over both such as fully processed real-time data availability (vs. comScore/ Adobe), video and audio analytics (vs. Google) and enhanced support.
AT Internet is as easy to use as GA, if not more. AT Internet has a much higher respect for user data privacy than Google does and won't use it for advertising. Data stays in Europe which, given how the US has little respect for user privacy and given how unpredictable their …
The brands we work with use exclusively Mediametrie Net Rating to check the audience of the publisher's websites. Knowing AT Internet is a partner is very important for us and shows the quality of AT Internet product. Google Analytics, even if it's used by a lot of publishers, …
Actually, AT internet did not stack up against other solutions. AT Internet is very expensive comparing other solutions. There are many open-sources and free tools in the market like Matomo. So we stopped to use AT Internet.
AT Internet is more comprehensive than Google Analytics. It allows you to make personalized requests, to access the API easily with high quotas. Other tools accompany the analytics solution and are included in the license. Data are also stored and processed in European Union …
If you notice that a certain ad is performing well during a flash sale and want to increase the budget immediately, Amazon Marketing Cloud won’t provide real-time data. You’ll have to use Amazon Ads Manager instead. Example is that with me client has a low ad budget or a small number of customers, Amazon Marketing Cloud might not provide enough data to give you meaningful trends or recommendations. If you find a group of high-value customers using Amazon Marketing Cloud, you can’t just click a button to target them directly in Amazon DSP. Instead, you have to manually export the data and upload it elsewhere.
When it comes to web analytics AT Internet is well suited. We introduced AT Internet in 2017 after an evaluation project with other professional analytics solutions. Starting with our corporate website we quickly rolled it out to our customer experience platform, our webshops, and our corporate intranet based on SharePoint 2013. Especially the use in our intranet brought significant improvements over the standard analytics features SP 2013 is offering. The ATI tag systems with their flexibility allow us to include company-specific properties and thus making it possible for us to analyze our intranet usage on segments such as locations, branches, and so on.
It assists with following the conduct of clients when we make item developments.
AT Internet is utilized to break down the conduct of workers on another web and Android application project.
It is an investigation device, that empowers us to see client ventures, screen advanced KPIs, and once again use the information for promoting purposes.
Not so easy to make difference between users who are inside the company and those who come from other entities.
Some concept such as "taux de rebond" are not so easily explained.
Not so easy to rename the name of the pages consulted. For instance, if I have tagged a page as "Landing Page" but afterward I feel the name as misleading, I must ask my IT to change the name (ie "Home Page") but can't do it myself.
I gave this rating because I think that AT Internet is a good tool, user-friendly easy for onboarding and simple dashboards, however the majority of people use Google Analytics, especially media agency, it is easier for them to use Google Analytics.
likely because while it offers powerful insights, it has challenges in ease of use. Amazon Marketing Cloud requires SQL knowledge for queries, making it difficult for non-technical users. Unlike traditional marketing tools with simple dashboards, Amazon Marketing Cloud demands manual data extraction and analysis, slowing down decision-making. Another usability challenge is the lack of real-time data, which makes it hard to optimize campaigns instantly. If you want to adjust ad spend based on immediate performance, Amazon Marketing Cloud’s batch processing delays insights. Additionally, there’s no direct audience activation, meaning you have to export data manually instead of seamlessly applying insights within Amazon DSP. However, Amazon Marketing Cloud is highly valuable for in-depth analysis, audience segmentation, and attribution modeling. With better user-friendly features like pre-built reports, automation, and real-time analytics, usability could improve significantly, making it easier for businesses to maximize its potential.
Overall the experience is very good, it's quick, relaiable and does everything I would want. The only problems I have are matching the correct stats to what I want. It can be painful trying to find the right thing and the explanations are not always the clearest. That's the only issue i've found though.
I don't have any exemple in mind where AT Internet interface hasn't been available, i have always been able to use AT Internet when i needed it. The only issues to notice is that it happens sometimes that real time or D-1 datas are partially delayed.
I have not used the Support Team thereby I am unable to review how their Support Teams works. However, in an instance where I had an issue, my concerned department contacted their support team and I was provided with the solution of the problem I was facing within a short span of time.
The in-person training unfortunately does not match to our expectations, was too much focus on digital basis and not on AT Internet functionnalties and how to use it. We paid for one day and only 15 minutes at the end was focused on our real needs in terms of media analytics.
I have compared Google Ads Data Hub and Meta's Advanced Analytics with Amazon Marketing Cloud. Amazon Marketing Cloud is most notable for its insights into the deep Amazon ecosystem, Google for cross-platform tracking, and Meta for extensive social engagement analysis. AMC's privacy-safe query-based model is powerful but SQL-skilled, in contrast to Google's more accessible UI.
AT Internet suited our business needs at the best value. Adobe Analytics wasn't user friendly for non-technical employees, Google Analytics (free and premium) provided significant limitations in reporting and customization, and IBM Digital Analytics had limitations on the amount of API calls and dashboard reports you can create. Webtrends was very interesting, but we felt it was a lot of design without the same amount of value. None of these tools produced real-time data that could be reported on right away, some tools had data that you could view real-time but it wasn't in reports until 30 minutes later, or the closest thing to real-time was a 30-minute delay. AT Internet had a 4-minute delay which was crucial to our business needs. AT Internet also had the best recommendations for support, without a monthly service hour requirement, and with very responsive account managers.
Regarding AT Internet possibilities, it could be adapted to small or large organizations, easy to set up. We can add sites in makets that we launch e-commerce.