Amazon Simple Notification Service (SNS) vs. Oracle Integration (OIC)

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Amazon SNS
Score 8.0 out of 10
N/A
Amazon Web Services offers the Amazon Simple Notification Service (SNS) which provides pub/sub messaging and push notifications to iOS and Android devices. It is meant to operate in a microservices architecture and which can support event-driven contingencies and support the decoupling of applications.
$0.01
per 1 million
Oracle Integration (OIC)
Score 5.0 out of 10
N/A
The Oracle Integration Cloud Service is an iPaaS providing prebuilt integration flows between applications, including other Oracle products. The Integration Cloud Service is scaled for enterprises, with prebuilt codeless adapters for on-premises and SaaS systems and low-code automation capabilities.N/A
Pricing
Amazon Simple Notification Service (SNS)Oracle Integration (OIC)
Editions & Modules
API Requests & Payload Data
$0.01
per 1 million
API Requests
$0.50
per 1 million requests
Notification Deliveries
$0.50
per million notifications
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Amazon SNSOracle Integration (OIC)
Free Trial
NoYes
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeOptional
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Amazon Simple Notification Service (SNS)Oracle Integration (OIC)
Considered Both Products
Amazon SNS
Chose Amazon SNS
Amazon Simple Notification Service (SNS) is well integrated in AWS and has been there since the early days of public cloud. It is a cost effective and very inexpensive solution to meet the needs of event notifications and custom messaging. Wish to share that there is …
Chose Amazon SNS
Amazon’s SNS is incredibly easy to set up compared to the more powerful, but complex, Kafka flavours.
Chose Amazon SNS
I worked with Adobe campaign 2 years ago and comparatively, SNS is way better and easier to integrate with. There's a lack of latency with SNS and better customer support. Easier to group with subscriptions and easier to work from the command line with the use of the SDK. All …
Chose Amazon SNS
No obvious difference. We chose AWS SNS, as we are an AWS EdStart company and built on the AWS stack already.
Chose Amazon SNS
SNS helps in integrating with other AWS components which are used in development such as Lambda, APIGW, S3 and DynamoDb easily. If used with third party software like PagerDuty, it makes the development and integration more complex. It is used mostly for publishing and …
Chose Amazon SNS
We use AWS and becasue Amazon SNS can be easily integrated with AWS.
Chose Amazon SNS
Amazon Simple Notification Service and PagerDuty have been used by various organizations. Amazon SNS is ideal if you're within an AWS environment. PagerDuty is used when we are working outside of Amazon Web Services. Though PagerDuty is more expensive than Amazon SNS they do …
Chose Amazon SNS
SNS is already integrated with other AWS services. I can reuse lists or topics.
Chose Amazon SNS
We have looked at other service providers, including the local service providers as well, but Amazon SNS stood ahead of all in terms of service availability across the globe and cost-effective plans per notification SMS. Moreover, we can also use Amazon SNS along with other AWS …
Chose Amazon SNS
Common confusion between SNS and SQS. SNS directs information to its subscribers without any effort on the subscribers or individuals' end. SQS gathers the information and then the individual has to almost go find it. They do similar things but in a space where information can …
Chose Amazon SNS
We have opted ultimately for AWS SNS once configuration was set topics and subscriptions setup. Site 24 and US Monitor are considerations to this product, but incur cost outside of Amazon, so not best for starting up for our needs.
Chose Amazon SNS
The main reason we chose Amazon SNS is for easy integration with all the workflows in AWS. The other alternatives can be (and really are) best in specific points, but the main strength of SNS is that is one service of AWS, so we don't need to complicate things in our …
Chose Amazon SNS
Our company prioritizes using AWS offerings unless there is a strong use case for using something within Azure. SQS is a similar service that solves different problems and we are using it in conjunction with SNS.
Chose Amazon SNS
Our clients are mostly on AWS, so it was easy for us to use Amazon Simple Notification Service (SNS) and to integrate it with current applications.
Chose Amazon SNS
We use EC2 instances to train ML model against a heavy volume of data. When the model is trained (i.e. loss reduces to a certain level), we push notification to all the stakeholders to notify them the new model is available. To achieve it, SNS is the most simple and cost …
Chose Amazon SNS
We use a lot of services from AVS, and it's easy to set up all services between each other.
Chose Amazon SNS
Many products, including PagerDuty, can be used to notify stakeholders when alarms are triggered. SNS is only suitable for non-emergency email alerts, and integration with CloudWatch is its only advantage. If you want to be notified of an issue by email, SNS can be configured …
Chose Amazon SNS
SNS is much more customizable compared to SES and allows for many more delivery methods. While it is better for email-based notification services, not being able to send notifications via SMS limits your app functionality considerably. Being able to switch message delivery …
Chose Amazon SNS
As I mentioned previously, I wish we had gone with a different service such as a Mixpanel or OneSignal as they are reputable in the space and are known for their strong support and documentation. AWS SNS was the way to go for us at the time we chose it due to the fact that we …
Oracle Integration (OIC)
Chose Oracle Integration (OIC)
The nearest thing I have used to OIC is UiPath, as it is often used as a tool to integrate software together. However, it is much more suited to legacy software which have little to no API endpoints. If the infrastructure already exists I understand why people use RPA for …
Chose Oracle Integration (OIC)
Oracle Integration (OIC) Cloud is a new iPaaS that makes it very easy to connect ERP applications with Salesforce.com. They have pre-built connectors that eliminate errors by not having to worry about all the connection details needed to make sure the data mapping is accurate. …
Chose Oracle Integration (OIC)
Oracle has more SAS offerings than any other vendor and a higher number of clients are going towards Oracle SAS offering. In order to integrate SAS with other systems, OIC comes up with pre-built cloud adapters which make the turn around time faster than any other tool.
Chose Oracle Integration (OIC)
Oracle Mobile HUb is good to support the integration between Oracle ERP and Cloud systems.
Integration Cloud is way broader in supporting the integration between both Oracle and non oracle third party systems. Wherever the transactions are real time and huge, Integration Cloud …
Chose Oracle Integration (OIC)
I haven't used any products like Oracle Process Cloud in the past, but our organization is planning to test out UIPath RPA and see how it compares with Oracle Process Cloud in the near future.
Chose Oracle Integration (OIC)
Since we have the PeopleSoft application and other Oracle products, OIC seemed an ideal fit.
Chose Oracle Integration (OIC)
Oracle Integration Cloud product focuses more on integration compared to other Oracle products that we are using.
We selected the OIC product to solve our integration needs, which are growing day by day, and the core applications are becoming more of the backbone of these …
Chose Oracle Integration (OIC)
This is my first PaaS product I've used, so I cannot compare it to others, but I can attest to the ease of development vs coding integrations from scratch. It is a huge time saver from a development standpoint.
Chose Oracle Integration (OIC)
Since we have Oracle DB and numerous other Oracle products, OIC seemed an ideal fit.
Chose Oracle Integration (OIC)
OIC was better than all competitors evaluated.
Chose Oracle Integration (OIC)
Azure API Management
Chose Oracle Integration (OIC)
Boomi has more stable integration and connectivity to SFDC, email and a few other adapters, but with OIC the user-friendly UI makes it simpler to build and support various integrations.
Chose Oracle Integration (OIC)
OIC has allowed us to decommission our Tibco environment and migrate from outsourced integration development to in house where costs are lower and time to development has increased in some cases from months to days or weeks.
Chose Oracle Integration (OIC)
Oracle looks and is great to use in comparison to other products. It requires less coding and is deployed easy and fast.
Chose Oracle Integration (OIC)
The other option is SAP HANA Cloud Integration or SAP PI/PO as compared to OIC. However, there are less/no adapters available on SAP.
Chose Oracle Integration (OIC)
It can integrate with any software or hardware and is easy to deploy between Enterprise Resource Planning, Supply Chain functions like procurement, inventory, ordering, on-premise applications, and human resources, marketing, sales and services. The connectors for databases …
Chose Oracle Integration (OIC)
Oracle's solutions play well with their own software and other systems. Their cloud products are familiar if you have used one and the UI is easy to use. Uptime and reliability are also always a factor.
Chose Oracle Integration (OIC)
Most of the customers wanted to consolidate and prefer to have one solution provider for their entire needs (Hardware, OS, DB, SOA, UI, security)
Chose Oracle Integration (OIC)
SOA Suite Leverages JDeveloper and is much more robust than the standard tool. It incorporates so much more and has easy to use GUI features making it truely no comparison.
Chose Oracle Integration (OIC)
In my opinion there are other products that can implement SOA but the Oracle SOA Suite is the most comprehensive product available. I have not encountered many clients that disagree. While they may sometime moan and groan about the complexity they know that Oracle provides some …
Features
Amazon Simple Notification Service (SNS)Oracle Integration (OIC)
Cloud Data Integration
Comparison of Cloud Data Integration features of Product A and Product B
Amazon Simple Notification Service (SNS)
-
Ratings
Oracle Integration (OIC)
7.4
Ratings
8% below category average
Pre-built connectors00 Ratings7.80 Ratings
Connector modification00 Ratings7.80 Ratings
Support for real-time and batch integration00 Ratings5.80 Ratings
Data quality services00 Ratings6.10 Ratings
Data security features00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Monitoring console00 Ratings9.20 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Amazon Simple Notification Service (SNS)Oracle Integration (OIC)
Small Businesses
AWS IoT Core
AWS IoT Core
Score 9.9 out of 10
Make
Make
Score 8.9 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Apache Kafka
Apache Kafka
Score 7.7 out of 10
IBM App Connect
IBM App Connect
Score 9.5 out of 10
Enterprises
Google Cloud Pub/Sub
Google Cloud Pub/Sub
Score 9.0 out of 10
IBM App Connect
IBM App Connect
Score 9.5 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Amazon Simple Notification Service (SNS)Oracle Integration (OIC)
Likelihood to Recommend
8.0
(0 ratings)
8.6
(0 ratings)
Usability
9.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
8.4
(0 ratings)
9.0
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Amazon Simple Notification Service (SNS)Oracle Integration (OIC)
Likelihood to Recommend
Using SNS for any notification use case where available is the default and defacto solution. It directly integrates with SES to configure both incoming email and email delivery responses.
Additionally, any notifications, such as CloudWatch alarms, are a good use case for SNS topics and allow us to fan out delivery as needed (pagerduty, email, etc)
Read full review
Oracle Process Cloud is suited for medium-sized companies and up who want to create applications that can automate tasks without the need of recruiting more software developers. With a couple hours of training, any member of the organization's business team will be well-equipped with all of the knowledge that is needed to use Oracle Process Cloud effectively. If your IT team is large and able to take upon the task of making the given application, then something like Oracle BPM is a better solution.
Read full review
Pros
  • Built in for quicker setup within AWS ecosystem.
  • Trusted as you control the users and configuration via IAM and easy access controls.
  • Can be sent to S3 simple storage or for long term storage if required.
  • Can be used in many regions, same configs.
Read full review
  • Auto-association of Oracle applications prepopulates the application connector select box and preconfigures Oracle Integration (OIC) using secure credential access for faster integration.
  • Various other system connectors are available to use readily.
  • User-intuitive experience--Connectors, integrators, and dashboard can be seen on one page.
Read full review
Cons
  • At times you receive access denied errors which are annoying.
  • Rarely do you receive internal failure errors where you can't access the information. It is rare but it does happen.
  • You are required to add an MWS Authentication Token every so often. I wish it would pull that information automatically for you so you don't have to go searching for it.
Read full review
  • Currently, it is not retaining the logs for more than 3 days, which it needs to address.
  • We also need some functionality inside the interface to re-push the same transaction again so that it will be helpful while testing and fixing the issue.
  • Also, some log errors are not giving the correct details. Oracle needs to rectify those.
Read full review
Usability
It is useful for applications developed using event driven architecture. It helps in tracking and logging the events in a very timely and efficient manner. The dashboards are a little difficult to implement. But overall it is very easy to integrate with other AWS services like Lambda, API GW, S3 and DynamoDB. The permissions to access should be resolved before using it.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
The AWS documentation is well maintained and has lots of information which makes it easier for developers to refer to and develop applications in a fast efficient manner. It is well documented with examples which is easy to understand and implement. You can also get help by posting into forums from like-minded developers.
Read full review
The team is proactive and takes the issue up for resolution, they follow continuous development and release.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Amazon Simple Notification Service (SNS) is well integrated in AWS and has been there since the early days of public cloud. It is a cost effective and very inexpensive solution to meet the needs of event notifications and custom messaging. Wish to share that there is considerable number of developers who can easily build solutions using AWS SNS. So, training costs are minimal. Other solutions are emerging and we are seeing a great usage especially of Firebase notifications because of its very neat integration with open source cross platform hybrid app frameworks like ionic, xamarin. SNS needs to become better and should have plugin support for the mobile application developers using low code/no code tools too.
Read full review
The nearest thing I have used to OIC is UiPath, as it is often used as a tool to integrate software together. However, it is much more suited to legacy software which have little to no API endpoints. If the infrastructure already exists I understand why people use RPA for integration, however for when API's are easily accessible and you're using Oracle tools, OIC is better.
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • Cost of alert calls to the different stakeholders across different geographies have gone down since using Amazon SNS.
  • Amazon SNS has saved a lot of time for the employees that they used to spend to call multiple stakeholders so they can now focus more on productive tasks.
  • Amazon SNS usage needs prior knowledge of programming.
Read full review
  • We run big integration practices and that practice is pretty successful. We have seen the customer getting quick ROI as the initial investment is not much. The customer can also get a free 1-month trial instance of OICS to try out. All of our customers are happy with this investment so far.
Read full review
ScreenShots

Oracle Integration (OIC) Screenshots

Screenshot of Popular, pre-built adapters to connect applications.Screenshot of #24DaysOfIntegrationScreenshot of Leader in Gartner MQ iPaaS Quadrant - 2018Screenshot of Cloud Integration for Dummies  http://media.wiley.com/assets/7327/27/9781119263289_Cloud_Integration_and_API_Management_FD_Oracle_Special_Edition.pdf