Anaconda vs. Jupyter Notebook

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Anaconda
Score 8.1 out of 10
N/A
Anaconda provides access to the foundational open-source Python and R packages used in modern AI, data science, and machine learning. These enterprise-grade solutions enable corporate, research, and academic institutions around the world to harness open-source for competitive advantage and research. Anaconda also provides enterprise-grade security to open-source software through the Premium Repository.
$0
per month
Jupyter Notebook
Score 9.4 out of 10
N/A
Jupyter Notebook is an open-source web application that allows users to create and share documents containing live code, equations, visualizations and narrative text. Uses include: data cleaning and transformation, numerical simulation, statistical modeling, data visualization, and machine learning. It supports over 40 programming languages, and notebooks can be shared with others using email, Dropbox, GitHub and the Jupyter Notebook Viewer. It is used with JupyterLab, a web-based IDE for…N/A
Pricing
AnacondaJupyter Notebook
Editions & Modules
Free Tier
$0
per month
Starter Tier
$9
per month
Business Tier
$50
per month per user
Enterprise Tier
60.00+
per month per user
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
AnacondaJupyter Notebook
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
YesNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
AnacondaJupyter Notebook
Considered Both Products
Anaconda
Chose Anaconda
I am using both; when it comes to application deployment on the server, I use Docker, and sometimes, I use Docker with conda image for deployment when it comes to ML/DL apps.
Chose Anaconda
There are several reasons why Anaconda is better to use for me including that it is much easier to use than Baycharm. Also, the user interface is not as complicated as that of Baycharm. Even Anaconda does not slow down my device, using PaySharm slowed down my device in an …
Chose Anaconda
It provides several IDEs like Spyder and Jupiter that would be enough for me to write my Python script. You can easily install it on a Windows or Linux computer and supports many libraries.
Chose Anaconda
In Anaconda, [it is easy] to find and install the required libraries. Here, we can work on multiple projects with different sets of the environment. [It is] easy to create the notebook for developing the ML model and deployment. Right now, it is the best data science version …
Chose Anaconda
I have used many other tools for coding purposes.
But for python programming, the best fit tool is Anaconda.
Memory management is best in Anaconda.
Chose Anaconda
One of the main competitors to Anaconda can be Google products such as Colab. Colab gives you the flexibility to handle large datasets gives it an edge over Anaconda. But again, the ease of access and usability of Anaconda stacks up against Colab. Besides, Anaconda relies more …
Chose Anaconda
It is almost dishonest to compare Anaconda with PyCharm as they do different things in their basic forms unless you spend a lot of time configuring plugins on your PyCharm environment. Anaconda has a lot of things ready and you just need to install your libs and dependencies.
Chose Anaconda
This is an open source tool and used very easily. All the notebooks are under one navigator solved the whole problem.
Chose Anaconda
Anaconda has features which overpowers it over the other analytical tools I have used. Also it provides multiple ways to reach to the solution, depending on the developers expertise. When I was a beginner at using Anaconda, since it is open source and the community using …
Chose Anaconda
Free ware, better design ease of use
Chose Anaconda
On top of all the software that I have used, Anaconda is the best because in Anaconda we have built-in packages that provide no headache to install packages and we can design a separate environment for different projects. Anaconda has versions made for special use cases. …
Chose Anaconda
Some analyzed tools, such as Pycharm and Spyder, are simpler to use but still do not have all the libraries needed for those starting out in data science--or in institutions that need to grow in that direction. Anaconda is more robust but stable, more complete, and the …
Chose Anaconda
If the project is not large scale then Jupiter notebooks or Visual Studio Code serve well. If you don't have any dependency on Python versions, these IDEs can be well suited for fast development and deployment.
Chose Anaconda
Anaconda includes many standard data science packages where as the regular python installation does not.
Depending on use case, some may feel Anaconda may be "bloated"
For ease Anaconda is better, for minimizing extraneous package installation, the regular python installer is …
Chose Anaconda
I know that Pycharm is a IDE and Anaconda is a distribution. However I use Anaconda largely due to Jupyter Notebook, which more or less does the same job as Pycharm. 1 year ago I decided to use Anaconda (Jupiyer Notebook) as it is easier to use it as a beginner(at least my …
Chose Anaconda
Anaconda has 64-bit support in the community edition, and package management is more in line with the way we think.
Chose Anaconda
I have not used another program like Anaconda before.
Chose Anaconda
MATLAB is more of a pay-as-you-go alternative, which not only does not use Python but is also more bloated and costly. MATLAB takes longer to install, setup, and configure for new users who may require specific packages - such as the Classification Learner (machine learning), …
Chose Anaconda
Compare Anaconda to Unix coding system. You can use PIP to install and create requirement.txt to replace environment.yml to avoid using Anaconda. However, Anaconda is such an excellent tool to maintain your environment and check the version of your package and update the …
Chose Anaconda
Anaconda is very strong in the environment and version control that make data science work much easier. The only thing that might be comparable to Anaconda would be using Kubernetes to control Docker. Another potential improvement would be replacing spyder with PyCharm and Atom …
Chose Anaconda
I like SpyDER, which comes with Anaconda better for its intuitive layout and variable explorer options.
Chose Anaconda
Anaconda gives freedom to do anything with its packages, compared to other non-programming language-based softwares. It is almost possible to do anything with Anaconda. Anaconda brings ease of integrity because it is possible to integrate anything with a Python Py script, …
Chose Anaconda
Suitable for Python development where there’s internal supporting for Python; otherwise, other platform offers similar capabilities with lower cost.
Chose Anaconda
I prefer Anaconda due to the control I have at every level over the data and the visualizations. Power BI does a better job at guessing what graphics to use, but these usually aren't the most helpful. Anaconda and the slew of Python extensions that add incredible functionality, …
Chose Anaconda
Other systems might be easier to set-up but Anaconda is a fairly flexible analytics toolkit. It can be configured in a way that truly matches the way in which your business or analytics department works. Built on top of lots of open source projects so things aren't siloed and …
Jupyter Notebook
Chose Jupyter Notebook
As a beginner I tried all of them but finally due to simple and user friendly interface I opted it. I also tried visual basic which is also good platform with versatility, however for basic need it is the best.
Chose Jupyter Notebook
Jupyter is very easy to understand and easy to use. And can also be used by a student, freelancer, small industries, big industries. Jupyter also provides you a tool to work with machine learning and artificial intelligence.
Chose Jupyter Notebook
Negligible or no cost, Highly efficient, effective, scalable , hasslefree
Chose Jupyter Notebook
Jupyter Notebook is very attractive platform for new developers to code and to learn programming and perform tasks as compared to other IDE. It has very well and easy visualization, interactive programming and sharing the live code and slideshow is very easy as compare to …
Chose Jupyter Notebook
Jupyter is still the most well known and widely used platform I've seen. Using it over other competition like Zeppelin simply because of its availability, and my familiarity with its functionality.
Chose Jupyter Notebook
Jupyter Notebook is unique in that it offers a flexible, lightweight, easy-to-replicate way of organizing your code in a visually intuitive fashion that can be exported in a number of formats. I've found that the broad functionalities available within the notebooks suit a lot …
Chose Jupyter Notebook
Well, so far Jupyter Notebook has been the better tool for me. It gives us more freedom & has more ability to train ML models & do the data visualization more efficiently. It's easier to operate & has a very simple-to-understand UI & with the support for taking data from …
Chose Jupyter Notebook
I have used PyCharm as well as Jupyter Notebook and for me, Jupyter wins almost every time. I really like its user-friend interface for someone who is new to python programming. The ability to run a big chunk of code part by part is a big game-changer for me. One thing I would …
Chose Jupyter Notebook
It should have cleaner support for multi-environment setup and should also increase the amount of features. Moreover, more support should be present for other programming languages. It should also have the option to set a specific location that opens up whenever I run command …
Chose Jupyter Notebook
Jupyter is easier to handle and user friendly.

We have free access to it and its cell by cell executing feature is amazing.
Chose Jupyter Notebook
Jupyter Notebook has a nicer interface than RStudio in our opinion and since most of our group is familiar with Jupyter Notebook it has made it a default choice. Overall the interactive programming as well as the easy visualizations, model deployment, and markdown made Jupyter …
Chose Jupyter Notebook
Jupyter Notebook is the core feature extended on by many commercial alternatives. The commercial alternatives have more feature integration with the rest of their portfolio. RStudio is another competitor for interactive and literate programming.

Chose Jupyter Notebook
haven't actually explored as I decided to use it on a friend 's recommendation.
Chose Jupyter Notebook
An interesting thing is that Jupyter Notebook is run on browser environments which may or may not be a positive feature according to cases. VS Code on [the] other hand doesn't use any interface and can run Jupyter Notebooks too. Sometimes my browser consumes too much RAM due to …
Chose Jupyter Notebook
With Jupyter Notebook besides doing data analysis and performing complex visualizations you can also write machine learning algorithms with a long list of libraries that it supports. You can make better predictions, observations etc. with it which can help you achieve better …
Chose Jupyter Notebook
I like Jupyter Notebook over the other two because it keeps my work more organized. It helps me to structure my workflow and the ability to run commands in chunks keeps me from being confused when coming back to the work after some time.
Chose Jupyter Notebook
I selected Jupyter Notebook because this is better integrated with the existing production systems than optional tools (for example, R). It is also commonly used tool within the scientist community.
Chose Jupyter Notebook
When I tried Zeppelin in 2017, it was still in initial versions, Jupyter was way ahead as of then. Zeppelin had limitations and I wasn't confident of it making progress as much as Jupyter.
Features
AnacondaJupyter Notebook
Platform Connectivity
Comparison of Platform Connectivity features of Product A and Product B
Anaconda
9.3
Ratings
11% above category average
Jupyter Notebook
9.0
Ratings
7% above category average
Connect to Multiple Data Sources9.80 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Extend Existing Data Sources8.00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Automatic Data Format Detection9.70 Ratings8.50 Ratings
MDM Integration9.60 Ratings7.40 Ratings
Data Exploration
Comparison of Data Exploration features of Product A and Product B
Anaconda
8.5
Ratings
2% above category average
Jupyter Notebook
7.0
Ratings
18% below category average
Visualization9.00 Ratings6.00 Ratings
Interactive Data Analysis8.00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Data Preparation
Comparison of Data Preparation features of Product A and Product B
Anaconda
9.0
Ratings
10% above category average
Jupyter Notebook
9.5
Ratings
15% above category average
Interactive Data Cleaning and Enrichment8.80 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Data Transformations8.00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Data Encryption9.70 Ratings8.50 Ratings
Built-in Processors9.60 Ratings9.30 Ratings
Platform Data Modeling
Comparison of Platform Data Modeling features of Product A and Product B
Anaconda
9.2
Ratings
9% above category average
Jupyter Notebook
9.3
Ratings
10% above category average
Multiple Model Development Languages and Tools9.00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Automated Machine Learning8.90 Ratings9.20 Ratings
Single platform for multiple model development10.00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Self-Service Model Delivery9.00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Model Deployment
Comparison of Model Deployment features of Product A and Product B
Anaconda
9.5
Ratings
11% above category average
Jupyter Notebook
10.0
Ratings
16% above category average
Flexible Model Publishing Options10.00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Security, Governance, and Cost Controls9.00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
AnacondaJupyter Notebook
Small Businesses
Jupyter Notebook
Jupyter Notebook
Score 9.4 out of 10
IBM Watson Studio
IBM Watson Studio
Score 10.0 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Posit
Posit
Score 10.0 out of 10
Posit
Posit
Score 10.0 out of 10
Enterprises
Posit
Posit
Score 10.0 out of 10
Posit
Posit
Score 10.0 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
AnacondaJupyter Notebook
Likelihood to Recommend
10.0
(0 ratings)
10.0
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
7.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Usability
9.0
(0 ratings)
10.0
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
8.9
(0 ratings)
9.0
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
AnacondaJupyter Notebook
Likelihood to Recommend
I have asked all my juniors to work with Anaconda and Pycharm only, as this is the best combination for now. Coming to use cases: 1. When you have multiple applications using multiple Python variants, it is a really good tool instead of Venv (I never like it). 2. If you have to work on multiple tools and you are someone who needs to work on data analytics, development, and machine learning, this is good. 3. If you have to work with both R and Python, then also this is a good tool, and it provides support for both.
Read full review
I would rate it 9/10 while recommending Jupyter Notebook as it offers me a wide range of functionality to operate. It is very well suited for someone who is new to python programming as the user interface helps you build code line by line. I personally have written multiple programs in Python using Jupyter Notebook as it helps me organize long code by breaking it in a structure. Also the ability to write comments using '#' helps a lot to a reader understand the code.
Read full review
Pros
  • Installing packages is very easy with Anaconda. Anaconda comes with 'anaconda navigator', a terminal-like utility from which you can easily install R packages and python libraries.
  • Launching R and python IDEs as well as Jupyter notebooks from anaconda navigator is simple, and Anaconda makes it very easy to keep these packages up-to-date.
  • I really like the fact that if you don't want to install the full version of Anaconda, you can opt to install a lightweight version (called Miniconda) that includes less python libraries and only core conda. I've installed it when I didn't want to take up as much disk space as Anaconda requires, but it works just the same.
Read full review
  • Coding and error correction line by line
  • Simple and Effectiveness
  • Easy to use for visualisation and presentation of code
  • Could be used at any place any time without hassle
Read full review
Cons
  • More graphics need in Spyder book. If you work for couple of years then you will be bored with the graphics.
  • Extra tools are required for making it secure. We uses extra tools for adding Username /Password to Jupyter.
  • R Studio Hangs a lot when open from Anaconda Navigator.
Read full review
  • Need more Hotkeys for creating a beautiful notebook. Sometimes we need to download other plugins which messes [with] its default settings.
  • Not as powerful as IDE, which sometimes makes [the] job difficult and allows duplicate code as it get confusing when the number of lines increases. Need a feature where [an] error comes if duplicate code is found or [if a] developer tries the same function name.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
It's really good at data processing, but needs to grow more in publishing in a way that a non-programmer can interact with. It also introduces confusion for programmers that are familiar with normal Python processes which are slightly different in Anaconda such as virtualenvs.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Usability
I am giving this rating because I have been using this tool since 2017, and I was in college at that time. Initially, I hesitated to use it as I was not very aware of the workings of Python and how difficult it is to manage its dependency from project to project. Anaconda really helped me with that. The first machine-learning model that I deployed on the Live server was with Anaconda only. It was so managed that I only installed libraries from the requirement.txt file, and it started working. There was no need to manually install cuda or tensor flow as it was a very difficult job at that time. Graphical data modeling also provides tools for it, and they can be easily saved to the system and used anywhere.
Read full review
Jupyter is highly simplistic. It took me about 5 mins to install and create my first "hello world" without having to look for help. The UI has minimalist options and is quite intuitive for anyone to become a pro in no time. The lightweight nature makes it even more likeable.
Read full review
Support Rating
Anaconda provides fast support, and a large number of users moderate its online community. This enables any questions you may have to be answered in a timely fashion, regardless of the topic. The fact that it is based in a Python environment only adds to the size of the online community.
Read full review
I haven't had a need to contact support. However, all required help is out there in public forums.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
One of the main competitors to Anaconda can be Google products such as Colab. Colab gives you the flexibility to handle large datasets gives it an edge over Anaconda. But again, the ease of access and usability of Anaconda stacks up against Colab. Besides, Anaconda relies more on your machine which makes it safe to use.
Read full review
Jupyter Notebook is unique in that it offers a flexible, lightweight, easy-to-replicate way of organizing your code in a visually intuitive fashion that can be exported in a number of formats. I've found that the broad functionalities available within the notebooks suit a lot of needs I have for EDA, modeling, and data export that makes other software products fairly redundant.
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • Positive impact - Multiple options for data presenting , visualizing and sharing. (Eg: R-Markdown).
  • Positive impact - Ease of access to build complex machine learning models. (I work in NLP, it has multiple built in models to analyze the various contexts).
  • Positive impact - Conda package let's to deal with external packages which can be used in Jupyter.
Read full review
  • Positive impact: flexible implementation on any OS, for many common software languages
  • Positive impact: straightforward duplication for adaptation of workflows for other projects
  • Negative impact: sometimes encourages pigeonholing of data science work into notebooks versus extending code capability into software integration
Read full review
ScreenShots