Anaconda vs. Pytorch

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Anaconda
Score 8.1 out of 10
N/A
Anaconda provides access to the foundational open-source Python and R packages used in modern AI, data science, and machine learning. These enterprise-grade solutions enable corporate, research, and academic institutions around the world to harness open-source for competitive advantage and research. Anaconda also provides enterprise-grade security to open-source software through the Premium Repository.
$0
per month
Pytorch
Score 9.3 out of 10
N/A
Pytorch is an open source machine learning (ML) framework boasting a rich ecosystem of tools and libraries that extend PyTorch and support development in computer vision, NLP and or that supports other ML goals.N/A
Pricing
AnacondaPytorch
Editions & Modules
Free Tier
$0
per month
Starter Tier
$9
per month
Business Tier
$50
per month per user
Enterprise Tier
60.00+
per month per user
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
AnacondaPytorch
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
YesNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
AnacondaPytorch
Considered Both Products
Anaconda
Chose Anaconda
I am using both; when it comes to application deployment on the server, I use Docker, and sometimes, I use Docker with conda image for deployment when it comes to ML/DL apps.
Chose Anaconda
There are several reasons why Anaconda is better to use for me including that it is much easier to use than Baycharm. Also, the user interface is not as complicated as that of Baycharm. Even Anaconda does not slow down my device, using PaySharm slowed down my device in an …
Chose Anaconda
It provides several IDEs like Spyder and Jupiter that would be enough for me to write my Python script. You can easily install it on a Windows or Linux computer and supports many libraries.
Chose Anaconda
In Anaconda, [it is easy] to find and install the required libraries. Here, we can work on multiple projects with different sets of the environment. [It is] easy to create the notebook for developing the ML model and deployment. Right now, it is the best data science version …
Chose Anaconda
I have used many other tools for coding purposes.
But for python programming, the best fit tool is Anaconda.
Memory management is best in Anaconda.
Chose Anaconda
One of the main competitors to Anaconda can be Google products such as Colab. Colab gives you the flexibility to handle large datasets gives it an edge over Anaconda. But again, the ease of access and usability of Anaconda stacks up against Colab. Besides, Anaconda relies more …
Chose Anaconda
It is almost dishonest to compare Anaconda with PyCharm as they do different things in their basic forms unless you spend a lot of time configuring plugins on your PyCharm environment. Anaconda has a lot of things ready and you just need to install your libs and dependencies.
Chose Anaconda
This is an open source tool and used very easily. All the notebooks are under one navigator solved the whole problem.
Chose Anaconda
Anaconda has features which overpowers it over the other analytical tools I have used. Also it provides multiple ways to reach to the solution, depending on the developers expertise. When I was a beginner at using Anaconda, since it is open source and the community using …
Chose Anaconda
Free ware, better design ease of use
Chose Anaconda
On top of all the software that I have used, Anaconda is the best because in Anaconda we have built-in packages that provide no headache to install packages and we can design a separate environment for different projects. Anaconda has versions made for special use cases. …
Chose Anaconda
Some analyzed tools, such as Pycharm and Spyder, are simpler to use but still do not have all the libraries needed for those starting out in data science--or in institutions that need to grow in that direction. Anaconda is more robust but stable, more complete, and the …
Chose Anaconda
If the project is not large scale then Jupiter notebooks or Visual Studio Code serve well. If you don't have any dependency on Python versions, these IDEs can be well suited for fast development and deployment.
Chose Anaconda
Anaconda includes many standard data science packages where as the regular python installation does not.
Depending on use case, some may feel Anaconda may be "bloated"
For ease Anaconda is better, for minimizing extraneous package installation, the regular python installer is …
Chose Anaconda
I know that Pycharm is a IDE and Anaconda is a distribution. However I use Anaconda largely due to Jupyter Notebook, which more or less does the same job as Pycharm. 1 year ago I decided to use Anaconda (Jupiyer Notebook) as it is easier to use it as a beginner(at least my …
Chose Anaconda
Anaconda has 64-bit support in the community edition, and package management is more in line with the way we think.
Chose Anaconda
I have not used another program like Anaconda before.
Chose Anaconda
MATLAB is more of a pay-as-you-go alternative, which not only does not use Python but is also more bloated and costly. MATLAB takes longer to install, setup, and configure for new users who may require specific packages - such as the Classification Learner (machine learning), …
Chose Anaconda
Compare Anaconda to Unix coding system. You can use PIP to install and create requirement.txt to replace environment.yml to avoid using Anaconda. However, Anaconda is such an excellent tool to maintain your environment and check the version of your package and update the …
Chose Anaconda
Anaconda is very strong in the environment and version control that make data science work much easier. The only thing that might be comparable to Anaconda would be using Kubernetes to control Docker. Another potential improvement would be replacing spyder with PyCharm and Atom …
Chose Anaconda
I like SpyDER, which comes with Anaconda better for its intuitive layout and variable explorer options.
Chose Anaconda
Anaconda gives freedom to do anything with its packages, compared to other non-programming language-based softwares. It is almost possible to do anything with Anaconda. Anaconda brings ease of integrity because it is possible to integrate anything with a Python Py script, …
Chose Anaconda
Suitable for Python development where there’s internal supporting for Python; otherwise, other platform offers similar capabilities with lower cost.
Chose Anaconda
I prefer Anaconda due to the control I have at every level over the data and the visualizations. Power BI does a better job at guessing what graphics to use, but these usually aren't the most helpful. Anaconda and the slew of Python extensions that add incredible functionality, …
Chose Anaconda
Other systems might be easier to set-up but Anaconda is a fairly flexible analytics toolkit. It can be configured in a way that truly matches the way in which your business or analytics department works. Built on top of lots of open source projects so things aren't siloed and …
Pytorch
Chose Pytorch
Tensorflow without Keras is not a pleasant experience; when using Keras, it is pretty nice, but it feels more opinionated than PyTorch; one is less free, which is not an issue in industrial settings with classic workflow but can be an issue in research settings. JAX is great …
Chose Pytorch
Saving and loading Machine/Deep Learning models is very easy with Pytorch. It provides visualization capabilities when combined with Tensorboard, and mathematical operations are highly optimized. Easy to understand for a person who is an expert in Python. It takes significantly …
Chose Pytorch
Pytorch is very, very simple compared to Tensorflow. Simple to install, less dependency issues, and very small learning curve. Tensorflow is very much optimised for robust deployment but very complicated to train simple models and play around with the loss functions. It needs a …
Chose Pytorch
As I described in previous statements, Pytorch is much better suited than Tensorflow from a software development look. This Pythonic idea was then taken and repeated by all the other frameworks.

You can get to better performance models by better understanding the deep learning …
Chose Pytorch
The syntax of PyTorch is much better in my opinion, and the programming style is more pythonic and easier to use. I also think PyTorch is a lot easier to debug than the competitors I've listed (caffe2 and tensorflow). I do like some of the examples given on tensorflows website, …
Features
AnacondaPytorch
Platform Connectivity
Comparison of Platform Connectivity features of Product A and Product B
Anaconda
9.3
Ratings
11% above category average
Pytorch
-
Ratings
Connect to Multiple Data Sources9.80 Ratings00 Ratings
Extend Existing Data Sources8.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Automatic Data Format Detection9.70 Ratings00 Ratings
MDM Integration9.60 Ratings00 Ratings
Data Exploration
Comparison of Data Exploration features of Product A and Product B
Anaconda
8.5
Ratings
2% above category average
Pytorch
-
Ratings
Visualization9.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Interactive Data Analysis8.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Data Preparation
Comparison of Data Preparation features of Product A and Product B
Anaconda
9.0
Ratings
10% above category average
Pytorch
-
Ratings
Interactive Data Cleaning and Enrichment8.80 Ratings00 Ratings
Data Transformations8.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Data Encryption9.70 Ratings00 Ratings
Built-in Processors9.60 Ratings00 Ratings
Platform Data Modeling
Comparison of Platform Data Modeling features of Product A and Product B
Anaconda
9.2
Ratings
9% above category average
Pytorch
-
Ratings
Multiple Model Development Languages and Tools9.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Automated Machine Learning8.90 Ratings00 Ratings
Single platform for multiple model development10.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Self-Service Model Delivery9.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Model Deployment
Comparison of Model Deployment features of Product A and Product B
Anaconda
9.5
Ratings
11% above category average
Pytorch
-
Ratings
Flexible Model Publishing Options10.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Security, Governance, and Cost Controls9.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
AnacondaPytorch
Small Businesses
Jupyter Notebook
Jupyter Notebook
Score 9.4 out of 10
InterSystems IRIS
InterSystems IRIS
Score 7.7 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Posit
Posit
Score 10.0 out of 10
Posit
Posit
Score 10.0 out of 10
Enterprises
Posit
Posit
Score 10.0 out of 10
Posit
Posit
Score 10.0 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
AnacondaPytorch
Likelihood to Recommend
10.0
(0 ratings)
9.0
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
7.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Usability
9.0
(0 ratings)
10.0
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
8.9
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
AnacondaPytorch
Likelihood to Recommend
I have asked all my juniors to work with Anaconda and Pycharm only, as this is the best combination for now. Coming to use cases: 1. When you have multiple applications using multiple Python variants, it is a really good tool instead of Venv (I never like it). 2. If you have to work on multiple tools and you are someone who needs to work on data analytics, development, and machine learning, this is good. 3. If you have to work with both R and Python, then also this is a good tool, and it provides support for both.
Read full review
Everything deep learning related if not on TPU (in such case, JAX would be better suited). For LLM deployment, libraries such as vLLM would be better suited, too; otherwise, wrapping the PyTorch model with Ray is a good option.
Read full review
Pros
  • Installing packages is very easy with Anaconda. Anaconda comes with 'anaconda navigator', a terminal-like utility from which you can easily install R packages and python libraries.
  • Launching R and python IDEs as well as Jupyter notebooks from anaconda navigator is simple, and Anaconda makes it very easy to keep these packages up-to-date.
  • I really like the fact that if you don't want to install the full version of Anaconda, you can opt to install a lightweight version (called Miniconda) that includes less python libraries and only core conda. I've installed it when I didn't want to take up as much disk space as Anaconda requires, but it works just the same.
Read full review
  • Provides Benchmark datasets to test your custom algorithm
  • Provides with a lot of pre-coded neural net components to use for your flow
  • Gives a framework to write really abstract code.
Read full review
Cons
  • More graphics need in Spyder book. If you work for couple of years then you will be bored with the graphics.
  • Extra tools are required for making it secure. We uses extra tools for adding Username /Password to Jupyter.
  • R Studio Hangs a lot when open from Anaconda Navigator.
Read full review
  • It should have support for Java also as Java is one of the most popular language.
  • They should make things more easy if we want to use GPUs for computation.
  • They should keep adding the latest models so that we can easily load them for use for further fine-tuning.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
It's really good at data processing, but needs to grow more in publishing in a way that a non-programmer can interact with. It also introduces confusion for programmers that are familiar with normal Python processes which are slightly different in Anaconda such as virtualenvs.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Usability
I am giving this rating because I have been using this tool since 2017, and I was in college at that time. Initially, I hesitated to use it as I was not very aware of the workings of Python and how difficult it is to manage its dependency from project to project. Anaconda really helped me with that. The first machine-learning model that I deployed on the Live server was with Anaconda only. It was so managed that I only installed libraries from the requirement.txt file, and it started working. There was no need to manually install cuda or tensor flow as it was a very difficult job at that time. Graphical data modeling also provides tools for it, and they can be easily saved to the system and used anywhere.
Read full review
The big advantage of PyTorch is how close it is to the algorithm. Oftentimes, it is easier to read Pytorch code than a given paper directly. I particularly like the object-oriented approach in model definition; it makes things very clean and easy to teach to software engineers.
Read full review
Support Rating
Anaconda provides fast support, and a large number of users moderate its online community. This enables any questions you may have to be answered in a timely fashion, regardless of the topic. The fact that it is based in a Python environment only adds to the size of the online community.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
One of the main competitors to Anaconda can be Google products such as Colab. Colab gives you the flexibility to handle large datasets gives it an edge over Anaconda. But again, the ease of access and usability of Anaconda stacks up against Colab. Besides, Anaconda relies more on your machine which makes it safe to use.
Read full review
Saving and loading Machine/Deep Learning models is very easy with Pytorch. It provides visualization capabilities when combined with Tensorboard, and mathematical operations are highly optimized. Easy to understand for a person who is an expert in Python. It takes significantly less time to create valuable POCs as most of the things are inbuilt.
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • Positive impact - Multiple options for data presenting , visualizing and sharing. (Eg: R-Markdown).
  • Positive impact - Ease of access to build complex machine learning models. (I work in NLP, it has multiple built in models to analyze the various contexts).
  • Positive impact - Conda package let's to deal with external packages which can be used in Jupyter.
Read full review
  • Less time wasted on handling the library version issues
  • Small learning curve as very similar to Python
  • Compatibility with other popular Python libraries makes it easy to build a lot of things on it
Read full review
ScreenShots