Anodot vs. Icinga

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Anodot
Score 10.0 out of 10
N/A
Anodot from the company of the same name in Ra'anana is presented as an advanced AI platform, built from the ground up to monitor, analyze and correlate 100% of company data in real-time. Anodot applies AI to deliver autonomous analytics in real-time, across all data types. The vendor states they provide analysts mastery over their business with a self-service AI platform that runs continuously to eliminate blind spots, alert incidents, and investigate root causes.N/A
Icinga
Score 7.8 out of 10
N/A
Icinga is an open source network monitoring platform. It includes automation, modularized integration packages, and prebuilt alerts and reporting capabilities.N/A
Pricing
AnodotIcinga
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
AnodotIcinga
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
AnodotIcinga
Considered Both Products
Anodot

No answer on this topic

Icinga
Chose Icinga
PRTG was the solution that was implemented before. As Icinga is Open Source we saved the licensing fee, as we ran out of free checks. I also had knowledge in Icinga so we switched over.

Nagios is inferior to Icinga in my opinion, as Icinga has the better Web UI, which I use the …
Chose Icinga
Installation and initial configuration is straight forward. However the system can grow in complexity very quickly, if not managed correctly.
Chose Icinga
The best of commercial products is nearly as good at cross platform monitoring as Icinga, and all of them are expensive.
Chose Icinga
Icinga was initially a fork of Nagios. Over time, the configuration language was replaced with something more programmatic. This configuration language is one of the big sellers of this product. It allows flexible, quick configuration of large sets of hosts and services with …
Chose Icinga
While Icinga holds its own against old stalwarts like Nagios and Zabbix, it simply can't compete with the new generation of SaaS service/server monitoring software in terms of ease of use, feature-completeness, integration with things like Cloudwatch, CloudHealth, New Relic, …
Chose Icinga
There are two main competitors of Icinga in my opinion, Nagios, and NetFlow based monitoring solutions. Both are good, Icinga, is a more refined version of Nagios with a much better API and backwards compatibility to the platform. If you are running Nagios, you can transfer …
Chose Icinga
Icinga is better than Nagios because of its nicer user interface. New Relic can monitor CPU/memory and disk usage, but it's more of a performance and application troubleshooting tool rather than monitoring.
Features
AnodotIcinga
Monitoring Tasks
Comparison of Monitoring Tasks features of Product A and Product B
Anodot
9.7
Ratings
22% above category average
Icinga
-
Ratings
Remote monitoring9.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Network device monitoring10.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Automated alerts and notifications10.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Reporting
Comparison of Reporting features of Product A and Product B
Anodot
10.0
Ratings
27% above category average
Icinga
-
Ratings
Performance data reports10.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Customizable reporting10.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Data visualization10.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
AnodotIcinga
Small Businesses
Panda Systems Management
Panda Systems Management
Score 9.8 out of 10
ConnectWise Automate
ConnectWise Automate
Score 8.3 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
ManageEngine ADAudit Plus
ManageEngine ADAudit Plus
Score 9.2 out of 10
Logz.io
Logz.io
Score 7.0 out of 10
Enterprises
ManageEngine ADAudit Plus
ManageEngine ADAudit Plus
Score 9.2 out of 10
ScienceLogic SL1
ScienceLogic SL1
Score 8.9 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
AnodotIcinga
Likelihood to Recommend
10.0
(0 ratings)
8.0
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
-
(0 ratings)
9.0
(0 ratings)
Usability
10.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
10.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
AnodotIcinga
Likelihood to Recommend
In some business scenarios, it found a very uncommon behaviors in our campaigns, in a very detailed granularity (not just campaign level, but also ad group level and much more).
Read full review
If you're running bare-metal in a datacenter and your hosts are fairly static, it's probably okay to use something like Icinga to monitor your systems. In general, I would not recommend using any monitoring software based on Nagios (Icinga is a fork of Nagios) due to the outdated concepts inherent in those systems. There are a number of good SaaS monitoring solutions which are superior and several open source projects which implement an automation-centric approach to monitoring
Read full review
Pros
  • Detects traffic anomalies on time.
  • Help us to monitor our PPC campaigns.
Read full review
  • I think Icinga has a great search feature. I can always search for the hosts, host groups, or check names. When using just regular Nagios, I don't recall being able to do this search.
  • The fact that I can use Active Directory or LDAP for logins is a great feature.
  • If you are familiar with Nagios, it's very simple to combine the two products to get a polished finished product.
Read full review
Cons
  • Anodot sends sometimes some false alarm alerts.
Read full review
  • Decluttering - the dashboard seems to get very overwhelming
  • Segregation - would be helpful to split environments or clients into different areas
  • Alerting
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
No answers on this topic
Icinga is a solid solution which does everything it promises. It is backwards compatible with most Nagios instances, making the transition very easy. Once you get the hang of installing new plugins and editing configuration files expanding its monitoring capabilities are easy.
Read full review
Usability
We use it widely, across many business departments.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
Their support team always answer very fast.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
No answers on this topic
Icinga was initially a fork of Nagios. Over time, the configuration language was replaced with something more programmatic. This configuration language is one of the big sellers of this product. It allows flexible, quick configuration of large sets of hosts and services with minimal input. Comparing it to other products like WhatsUp Gold, Zenoss, Zabbix, etc., it stands out as incredibly flexible. Adding additional features to Icinga can be as simple as searching for them online. And if they don't yet exist, there is a full API available for custom extensions.
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • Helped us to find anomalies that would have cost a lot if not detected on time.
Read full review
  • With one check you know which applications are faulty e.g. after an upgrade. Which is big time saver
  • You easily detect outages ion the applications so that your customer ideally does not even realize there was an outage.
  • Detect if the environment does deliver the same result as in the same time as before to detect shortages.
  • Additional information when debugging. Saved us several hours where we could simply point to a database which was slow.
Read full review
ScreenShots