Anodot vs. N-able N-central

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Anodot
Score 10.0 out of 10
N/A
Anodot from the company of the same name in Ra'anana is presented as an advanced AI platform, built from the ground up to monitor, analyze and correlate 100% of company data in real-time. Anodot applies AI to deliver autonomous analytics in real-time, across all data types. The vendor states they provide analysts mastery over their business with a self-service AI platform that runs continuously to eliminate blind spots, alert incidents, and investigate root causes.N/A
N-able N-central
Score 8.9 out of 10
N/A
MSPs and IT professionals use N-able™ N-central® to monitor and manage devices and complex networks remotely. N-central provides visibility and efficiency as the user's needs scale. N-central can help users: 1. Proactively monitor everything on a customer network—not just servers and workstations—and troubleshoot. 2. Stay on top of threats with features like MFA, antivirus, integrated endpoint detection and response, data backup, disk encryption, email protection,…N/A
Pricing
AnodotN-able N-central
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
AnodotN-able N-central
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
AnodotN-able N-central
Features
AnodotN-able N-central
Monitoring Tasks
Comparison of Monitoring Tasks features of Product A and Product B
Anodot
9.7
Ratings
22% above category average
N-able N-central
7.4
Ratings
0% below category average
Remote monitoring9.00 Ratings9.70 Ratings
Network device monitoring10.00 Ratings8.30 Ratings
Automated alerts and notifications10.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Reporting
Comparison of Reporting features of Product A and Product B
Anodot
10.0
Ratings
27% above category average
N-able N-central
-
Ratings
Performance data reports10.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Customizable reporting10.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Data visualization10.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Management Tasks
Comparison of Management Tasks features of Product A and Product B
Anodot
-
Ratings
N-able N-central
9.0
Ratings
19% above category average
Patch Management00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
User Ratings
AnodotN-able N-central
Likelihood to Recommend
10.0
(0 ratings)
8.7
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
-
(0 ratings)
9.1
(0 ratings)
Usability
10.0
(0 ratings)
7.3
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
10.0
(0 ratings)
1.0
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
-
(0 ratings)
8.4
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
AnodotN-able N-central
Likelihood to Recommend
In some business scenarios, it found a very uncommon behaviors in our campaigns, in a very detailed granularity (not just campaign level, but also ad group level and much more).
Read full review
In my opinion, N-able N-central is a good "learn your lesson and move onto something better" tool. I've used many RMM tools over the years and I feel that this one is slow, does a terrible job with reporting, alerting, monitoring, software deployments, etc. The ability to turn on services like AV, backup, etc easily is cute, but you're not going to be able to use your own tools with this easily. In my experience, if you do turn those tools on for testing during the trial, you'll be charged later (despite it being a trial). They also turn off your ability to monitor these increased costs or to turn them off yourself. As a company, I found that they were impossible to work with. The sales team is right there if you want to buy something - but if you need anything other than to buy something, in my experience, they take days or weeks to navigate. I found that they are not a terribly ethical company and are more concerned with making a few dollars than creating a partnerships with MSPs. I can see value is in the advertised price of $99 for a hundred endpoints. However, you need to remember to not trial any other tools (like AV, backup, etc).
Read full review
Pros
  • Detects traffic anomalies on time.
  • Help us to monitor our PPC campaigns.
Read full review
  • Robust patch management: it is easy to set up patching groups via tags, and configures patch management profiles and maintenance windows.
  • Remote Control: as long as the agent checks in, it is very quick and easy to take control of an endpoint, either in a separate session (RDP, kick the current user out), or to join the existing session of the current user, to provide desktop support or collaborate remotely.
Read full review
Cons
  • Anodot sends sometimes some false alarm alerts.
Read full review
  • Expensive software
  • The support team are terrible
  • Sales team will promise the world to get you over the line
  • Subscription management is tedious
  • Old software with very little development and the support team will not provide any further information on this - no roadmap
  • Integrations galore - but none of them are effective
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
No answers on this topic
Overall we have liked our solar winds experience, however, as our company has grown to support larger enterprises, this product does not have the functionality that our teams need in order to fully support them. The lack of granularity with backups and lack of ability to support nutanix environments is slowly drawing us into the use of other tools.
Read full review
Usability
We use it widely, across many business departments.
Read full review
The user interface is fairly straight forward, with logic groupings for objects. I did not deploy this software, but am one of the daily administrators. Once you get the correct agent package (Which can be a challenge) the integration into AD is not bad. The UI could be more customized, but that may have been a design choice.
Read full review
Support Rating
Their support team always answer very fast.
Read full review
Every time we have reached out to SolarWinds they are quick to respond, even offering support chat 24/7. Their support team is great and works with you to find solutions to issues. They have taken items we had issues with before and used those to create updates so that the issue is handled better in the future.
Read full review
Implementation Rating
No answers on this topic
Make sure if you your using a vm you follow the instructions for provisioning to the letter or it will be starting from square one
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
No answers on this topic
Most advanced, and other technicians in the business already used it before. NinjaOne was a close competitor, but lacked some features that we ideally need. ITarian was too basic but was MUCH cheaper. For a startup MSP, it would be much more attractive. Splashtop was just for remote connections, which we used for some time before realizing full RMMs were a better fit for our requirements.
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • Helped us to find anomalies that would have cost a lot if not detected on time.
Read full review
  • The product definitely increases productivity. Technicians can spend a few seconds to take care of remote tasks with a few clicks as opposed to minutes to get a user to start a remote control session, or worse, going on site to work on a piece of equipment.
  • The packaging of the features makes selling and pricing the product fairly straight-forward and convenient. This saves our sales team time from trying to work with add-ons when pricing our services - the product makes it easy to just have an "all you can eat" package at a set price.
  • When something goes wrong with the product, our business and our customers suffer. If for example, a bug causes all managed computers to reboot, our customers call in, resulting in our technicians being booked solid doing damage control. This also causes loss of trust with our customers - we can't simply blame the product, the customer trusts us to provide them a service and if the product fails, we fail.
Read full review
ScreenShots

N-able N-central Screenshots

Screenshot of N-able N-central DashboardScreenshot of Remote desktop access with Take Control