Apache Airflow vs. Control-M

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Apache Airflow
Score 8.6 out of 10
N/A
Apache Airflow is an open source tool that can be used to programmatically author, schedule and monitor data pipelines using Python and SQL. Created at Airbnb as an open-source project in 2014, Airflow was brought into the Apache Software Foundation’s Incubator Program 2016 and announced as Top-Level Apache Project in 2019. It is used as a data orchestration solution, with over 140 integrations and community support.N/A
Control-M
Score 9.3 out of 10
N/A
Control-M from BMC is a platform for integrating, automating, and orchestrating application and data workflows in production across complex hybrid technology ecosystems. It provides deep operational capabilities, delivering speed, scale, security, and governance.
$29,000
per year
Pricing
Apache AirflowControl-M
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
On-Premise
Contact Sales
SaaS
Starting at $29,000
per year
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Apache AirflowControl-M
Free Trial
NoYes
Free/Freemium Version
YesNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeOptional
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Apache AirflowControl-M
Considered Both Products
Apache Airflow
Chose Apache Airflow
Multiple DAGs can be orchestrated simultaneously at varying times, and runs can be reproduced or replicated with relative ease. Overall, utilizing Apache Airflow is easier to use than other solutions now on the market. It is simple to integrate in Apache Airflow, and the …
Chose Apache Airflow
Using Jenkins and Kafka, it is not for the same purpose, although it might be similar. I would say AirFlow is really what it says on the can - workflow management. For our organisation, the purpose is clear. So long your aim is to have a rich workflow scheduler and job …
Chose Apache Airflow
Apache Airflow is far superior!
Chose Apache Airflow
Much easy to deploy Apache Airflow as opposed to other products, with flexible deployment options as well as flexible integration with other tools and platforms.
Chose Apache Airflow
digdag (https://www.digdag.io/)- Digdag is a very simple build, run, schedule, and monitor complex pipelines of tasks with a simple implementation and no configuration. Easy to write YAMLs

Airflow has a better community and widely adopted. Has a better UI and better documentation
Chose Apache Airflow
Overall using Apache Airflow is easy to use compare than other other tools available in the market, It is easy to integrate in apache airflow and the workflow can be monitored and scheduling can be done easily using apache airflow, recommend this tool for Automating the data …
Chose Apache Airflow
Airflow was best suited in my use case for designing the ETL pipelines in a scripted manner for workflows & the UI was very good & easy to use.
Chose Apache Airflow
There are a number of reasons to choose Apache Airflow over other similar platforms- Integrations—ready-to-use operators allow you to integrate Airflow with cloud platforms (Google, AWS, Azure, etc) Apache Airflow helps with backups and other DevOps tasks, such as submitting a …
Chose Apache Airflow
Step functions are only available in AWS but Apache Airflow provides cross cloud access. Apache Airflow also provides flexibility to pause, start and re-trigger dags. Provides executors where we can run in-house calculations if needed and which requires no integration with …
Chose Apache Airflow
Apache Airflow is suited for a much wider set of use cases compared to Databricks. You can run it anywhere, and there is also no vendor lock-in. With Airflow, we can utilize almost any compute engine. Same thing we want to do with Databricks. There might be some level of …
Control-M
Chose Control-M
Because of some of the best features the Control-M provides which includes but not limited to- Automation workload processing, manager file transfer, data pipelines, integrations, hybrid and multi cloud workflow.
Chose Control-M
AutoSys Workload Automation, HCL Workload Automation and Apache Airflow
Chose Control-M
Control-M allows you to run several types of batch jobs. For this case, SAP jobs which are not available to JAMS.
Chose Control-M
Broadcom Automic Automation and IBM Workload Automation
Chose Control-M
We would still use Control-M as overall orchestrator to manage the workflows created in these other products. We do not consider them as a replacement for Control-M.
Chose Control-M
Both cover the functionalities that we require. We are with CtrlM because it is a solution that other business units of the organization have.
Chose Control-M
Control-M is more robust and easier to use
Chose Control-M
Control-M is very easy to use and it is easy to visually see how tasks are performing. Having the logs in one place when a task fails makes troubleshooting easier.
Chose Control-M
Control-M has proven to be much more reliable and not prone to crashes like UC4 had. It’s also more versatile since we can build almost anything we may need with the application integrator.
Chose Control-M
We have been using Control-M for almost 20 years and our teams are already trained to use it. Other tools are not as robust and resilient as Control-M. Control-M's graphical interface is very easy to use.
Chose Control-M
Control-M has a lot more features within it. Also, the structure is more visual than active batch and it's easier to navigate around
Chose Control-M
Control-M by far is the leader in this industry. The ease of use of the product and the ability to get others up to speed on using the product because of this is great.
Chose Control-M
Control-M is better then AutoSys in all aspects, from managing the solution to using it to basic and advanced functionality.
Chose Control-M
We still use Power Automate but for different scenarios where job dependency is not required.
Features
Apache AirflowControl-M
Workload Automation
Comparison of Workload Automation features of Product A and Product B
Apache Airflow
9.8
Ratings
17% above category average
Control-M
8.7
Ratings
5% above category average
Multi-platform scheduling10.00 Ratings9.40 Ratings
Central monitoring10.00 Ratings9.20 Ratings
Logging10.00 Ratings8.30 Ratings
Alerts and notifications10.00 Ratings8.50 Ratings
Analysis and visualization10.00 Ratings8.40 Ratings
Application integration9.00 Ratings8.40 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Apache AirflowControl-M
Small Businesses

No answers on this topic

No answers on this topic

Medium-sized Companies
ActiveBatch Workload Automation
ActiveBatch Workload Automation
Score 7.5 out of 10
Apache Airflow
Apache Airflow
Score 8.6 out of 10
Enterprises
Redwood RunMyJobs
Redwood RunMyJobs
Score 9.6 out of 10
Redwood RunMyJobs
Redwood RunMyJobs
Score 9.6 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Apache AirflowControl-M
Likelihood to Recommend
9.1
(0 ratings)
9.3
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
-
(0 ratings)
9.6
(0 ratings)
Usability
10.0
(0 ratings)
9.0
(0 ratings)
Availability
-
(0 ratings)
8.9
(0 ratings)
Performance
-
(0 ratings)
8.7
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
-
(0 ratings)
9.3
(0 ratings)
In-Person Training
-
(0 ratings)
9.6
(0 ratings)
Online Training
-
(0 ratings)
9.2
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
-
(0 ratings)
9.6
(0 ratings)
Configurability
-
(0 ratings)
9.4
(0 ratings)
Ease of integration
-
(0 ratings)
8.6
(0 ratings)
Product Scalability
-
(0 ratings)
9.0
(0 ratings)
Vendor post-sale
-
(0 ratings)
9.4
(0 ratings)
Vendor pre-sale
-
(0 ratings)
9.4
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Apache AirflowControl-M
Likelihood to Recommend
For a quick job scanning of status and deep-diving into job issues, details, and flows, AirFlow does a good job. No fuss, no muss. The low learning curve as the UI is very straightforward, and navigating it will be familiar after spending some time using it. Our requirements are pretty simple. Job scheduler, workflows, and monitoring. The jobs we run are >100, but still is a lot to review and troubleshoot when jobs don't run. So when managing large jobs, AirFlow dated UI can be a bit of a drawback.
Read full review
Scenarios where it's well suited are where you're running jobs across platforms. We have processes on our mainframe that have to complete our daily batch processing and the controlling handles the scheduling of the daily batch processing. Then once that's done, it moves into executing stuff on servers like SQL loads and transferring files to load into SQL and then also running reporting on the SQL servers when the data's been loaded and is available. It makes for a really smooth transition of the overnight processing the bank has to go through. That's our main function that we use it for currently. It handles it very well.
Read full review
Pros
  • Apache Airflow is one of the best Orchestration platforms and a go-to scheduler for teams building a data platform or pipelines.
  • Apache Airflow supports multiple operators, such as the Databricks, Spark, and Python operators. All of these provide us with functionality to implement any business logic.
  • Apache Airflow is highly scalable, and we can run a large number of DAGs with ease. It provided HA and replication for workers. Maintaining airflow deployments is very easy, even for smaller teams, and we also get lots of metrics for observability.
Read full review
  • Workload change manager is one of our favorite features of this product. It enforces standards, which is a huge benefit. Users don't just make crazy changes that cause issues with other jobs. It does great promotions from one environment to another, transforming all the data to match the next environment.
Read full review
Cons
  • A local "dry run" or IDE plugin that can validate and simulate DAG execution without needing a full environment.
  • Better feedback on DAG parse errors in the UI or CLI.
  • Navigating large DAGs with hundreds of tasks can be slow and hard to understand visually.
Read full review
  • Certificate on all levels: Each agent uses different keystrokes for different functions, such as AI, web service calls, and MFT.
  • It's really hard to manage these keystrokes.
  • Trust stores, in case control-m, act as servers; it should be simple to implement certificates from a corporate CA.
  • Some functions must be performed in the fat client, while others can only be performed through the web interface. This should be streamlined as soon as possible.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
No answers on this topic
Control-M integrates with DevOps toolchains to automate the deployment of applications and updates. It supports Jobs-as-Code, allowing developers to define workflows programmatically, which accelerates development cycles and improves deployment consistency1.These use cases highlight how Control-M can streamline operations, enhance efficiency, and support critical business functions across various domains.
Read full review
Usability
For its capability to connect with multicloud environments. Access Control management is something that we don't get in all the schedulers and orchestrators. But although it provides so many flexibility and options to due to python , some level of knowledge of python is needed to be able to build workflows.
Read full review
Since it is GUI-based, it is not hard to use, although all new programs have a learning curve. The color scheme is easy to use to find the status of different Batch jobs. The check-in and check-out feature of job definitions is easy to use and avoids problems with users trying to use the same resource at the same time.
Read full review
Reliability and Availability
No answers on this topic
Secondary Instances: Control-M supports the installation of a secondary instance of the entire Control-M environment, Control-M/EM, or Control-M/Server.Automatic & Manual Failover: In case of a failure on the primary host, Control-M can automatically failover to the secondary host if using Oracle or MSSQL databases. Manual failover is also an option, enabling a controlled switch during planned maintenance.Fallback: After resolving the issue on the primary host, you can easily fall back to it, or even designate the secondary host as the new primary. Database Replication: For high availability, Control-M leverages database replication from the primary site to a disaster recovery site. While replication is essential, its implementation and maintenance are the user's responsibility.
Read full review
Performance
No answers on this topic
good page load times, efficient report completion, and minimal impact on integrated systems. Specifically, the well-designed GUI contributes to a positive user experience, and the platform's ability to automate various stages of the workflow, including Big Data processes, is highlighted as a key strength. Fast Page Loads: Control-M is reported to have a responsive user interface with fast page load times, allowing users to quickly navigate and manage their workflows
Read full review
Support Rating
No answers on this topic
He contactado varias veces con el soporte de BMC y ha sido bastante bueno, siempre han sabido darme una solución a lo que he pedido. Esta vez quiero hacer alguna nueva pregunta, pero no se si se me podrá contestar, ya que es algo que tal vez fuera de otro rango y no pertenezca a ellos.
Read full review
In-Person Training
No answers on this topic
Very knowledgeable instructors provide a hands-on, collaborative learning experience and can interact directly with instructors to develop our Control-M skills. This format allows for immediate feedback, in-depth discussions, and tailored guidance, leading to a deeper understanding of Control-M concepts and practical application. Face-to-face interaction fosters higher engagement and a more dynamic learning environment.
Read full review
Online Training
No answers on this topic
Simple and easy to use web based, well paced. Available any time. All online courses are simple and easy to access and use. Very practical everyday use scenarios and solutions. Incorporates software simulations, learning games, and built-in assessments to enhance comprehension and engagement. Online subscriptions are regularly updated with the latest product information, ensuring users have access to the most current knowledge.
Read full review
Implementation Rating
No answers on this topic
As HA we have depend on the external DB, why don't we have HA feasibility with embedded DB. As with external DB, there are performance issues and fine tuning the DB. As if its embedded DB, Control-M it self take care of the functionality.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Apache Airflow is suited for a much wider set of use cases compared to Databricks. You can run it anywhere, and there is also no vendor lock-in. With Airflow, we can utilize almost any compute engine. Same thing we want to do with Databricks. There might be some level of difficulty based on the support.
Read full review
I met him as a Control-M consultant, performing migrations from CA to BMC. I knew the product and interface were not as friendly or intuitive as Control-M's and could not integrate new technologies and external applications. One of CA's excellent capabilities was the ability to incorporate executions with Java Scripting to obtain variable values ​​or to order processes natively in the application using its utilities.
Read full review
Scalability
No answers on this topic
awesome product.Control-M delivers advanced operational capabilities easily consumed by Dev, Ops, data teams, and lines of business.Control-M Workflow InsightsApplication and data workflow observability: Increased confidence that SLAs are being met for Control-M users and IT leadersComprehensive control and management capabilities: Enhanced dashboards and reporting with constant telemetry and intelligent analysis on executing workflowsSelf-service visibility: In-depth reporting to help teams work autonomously
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • Most of the ETL processes were automated, cutting down on human labor.
  • Apache Airflow's user interface (UI) was very informative and straightforward.
  • Since ETL processes were providing data via airflow, we were able to gain a deeper comprehension of the data at hand.
Read full review
  • Control-M has improved service delivery times, reliability and quality of batch processing.
  • It has simplified the management of the operation and the use of the alert system has made it possible to act in a coordinated and efficient manner to solve problems.
  • The implementation of policies has made it possible to make greater use of Control-M and thus reduce development costs that are generated unnecessarily when the potential of the system is not considered.
Read full review
ScreenShots