Apache Airflow vs. Tidal by Redwood

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Apache Airflow
Score 8.6 out of 10
N/A
Apache Airflow is an open source tool that can be used to programmatically author, schedule and monitor data pipelines using Python and SQL. Created at Airbnb as an open-source project in 2014, Airflow was brought into the Apache Software Foundation’s Incubator Program 2016 and announced as Top-Level Apache Project in 2019. It is used as a data orchestration solution, with over 140 integrations and community support.N/A
Tidal by Redwood
Score 6.8 out of 10
N/A
Tidal Automation, from Redwood Software since the early 2023 acquisition, is an enterprise workload automation platform for automating and orchestrating cross-application, cross-platform workloads – in on-prem, cloud or hybrid environments – from one central point of control. Tidal is used to optimize mission-critical business processes, manage…N/A
Pricing
Apache AirflowTidal by Redwood
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Apache AirflowTidal by Redwood
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
YesNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Apache AirflowTidal by Redwood
Considered Both Products
Apache Airflow
Chose Apache Airflow
Multiple DAGs can be orchestrated simultaneously at varying times, and runs can be reproduced or replicated with relative ease. Overall, utilizing Apache Airflow is easier to use than other solutions now on the market. It is simple to integrate in Apache Airflow, and the …
Chose Apache Airflow
Using Jenkins and Kafka, it is not for the same purpose, although it might be similar. I would say AirFlow is really what it says on the can - workflow management. For our organisation, the purpose is clear. So long your aim is to have a rich workflow scheduler and job …
Chose Apache Airflow
Apache Airflow is far superior!
Chose Apache Airflow
Much easy to deploy Apache Airflow as opposed to other products, with flexible deployment options as well as flexible integration with other tools and platforms.
Chose Apache Airflow
digdag (https://www.digdag.io/)- Digdag is a very simple build, run, schedule, and monitor complex pipelines of tasks with a simple implementation and no configuration. Easy to write YAMLs

Airflow has a better community and widely adopted. Has a better UI and better documentation
Chose Apache Airflow
Overall using Apache Airflow is easy to use compare than other other tools available in the market, It is easy to integrate in apache airflow and the workflow can be monitored and scheduling can be done easily using apache airflow, recommend this tool for Automating the data …
Chose Apache Airflow
Airflow was best suited in my use case for designing the ETL pipelines in a scripted manner for workflows & the UI was very good & easy to use.
Chose Apache Airflow
There are a number of reasons to choose Apache Airflow over other similar platforms- Integrations—ready-to-use operators allow you to integrate Airflow with cloud platforms (Google, AWS, Azure, etc) Apache Airflow helps with backups and other DevOps tasks, such as submitting a …
Chose Apache Airflow
Step functions are only available in AWS but Apache Airflow provides cross cloud access. Apache Airflow also provides flexibility to pause, start and re-trigger dags. Provides executors where we can run in-house calculations if needed and which requires no integration with …
Chose Apache Airflow
Apache Airflow is suited for a much wider set of use cases compared to Databricks. You can run it anywhere, and there is also no vendor lock-in. With Airflow, we can utilize almost any compute engine. Same thing we want to do with Databricks. There might be some level of …
Tidal by Redwood
Chose Tidal by Redwood
The time-to-deliver an automated job was much less with Tidal by Redwood than the other automation solutions. Tidal by Redwood product is much more evolved than many newer market contenders.
Chose Tidal by Redwood
It is in its very best in automatically controlling all the works by scheduling jobs by its self which make happy to see such kind of software's which very much helps any organization who uses it. It can be said that it can be used in ease having very good integration and work …
Chose Tidal by Redwood
Nothing much to say, as it is already known to its workload automation, which is very best in the mark compared to other software's which is a positive outcome to any organization which buys this software, best in interface, scalability, scheduling, easiness, notification …
Chose Tidal by Redwood
Tidal by Redwood excels at performing complex workflows, event-driven automation, and compliance-focused procedures in big companies with varied IT infrastructures. This includes claims, policy, and billing processes are included in this. The sending of our documents and checks …
Chose Tidal by Redwood
1. Tidal is good at processing large volume pf data and is cost effective.
2. Tidal can automate the scheduling of production objects, ensure that materials are delivered on time
3. Tidal Process large volumes of data which cannot be done everyday by running codes/scripts …
Chose Tidal by Redwood
Tidal automation is easy to use, user friendly when compared to other softwares. More flexible than other softwares in terms of integration with other applications and services. scheduling jobs by events is more efficient than scheduling jobs by time which other softwares …
Chose Tidal by Redwood
As an AI language model, I am inexperienced with alternative automation solutions and the particular business needs and goals that could influence a company to pick Tidal Automation over a competing product. Here is a comparison of Tidal Automation to some of its rivals in the …
Chose Tidal by Redwood
Tidal is the only SAP automation tool that we've used.
Chose Tidal by Redwood
The UI is much easier to navigate and easier to understand. Ability to cross multiple platforms.
Chose Tidal by Redwood
Tidal Automation had the best and most transparent pricing. Tidal Automation has the best dedicated team investing in the development of the product. Tidal Automation was always ahead of its time in the Workload Automation industry. It has the best in industry documentation of …
Chose Tidal by Redwood
compare to Control-M , Tidal automation is much better in way of job creation and maintained . Installation of Agent and Adapter configuration , API features which can automate the Task of scheduling and creation . we have both GUI and CLI to maintain the jobs and admin work. …
Chose Tidal by Redwood
I liked the ability to write code directly within Automic. I understood the logic of the "object oriented" design of the user interface, but I felt it was confusing to understand and troubleshoot.

You don't have to look too deep into Control-M to see it's mainframe roots. The …
Features
Apache AirflowTidal by Redwood
Workload Automation
Comparison of Workload Automation features of Product A and Product B
Apache Airflow
9.8
Ratings
17% above category average
Tidal by Redwood
8.3
Ratings
0% above category average
Multi-platform scheduling10.00 Ratings8.70 Ratings
Central monitoring10.00 Ratings8.60 Ratings
Logging10.00 Ratings8.50 Ratings
Alerts and notifications10.00 Ratings8.50 Ratings
Analysis and visualization10.00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Application integration9.00 Ratings7.80 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Apache AirflowTidal by Redwood
Small Businesses

No answers on this topic

No answers on this topic

Medium-sized Companies
ActiveBatch Workload Automation
ActiveBatch Workload Automation
Score 7.5 out of 10
Apache Airflow
Apache Airflow
Score 8.6 out of 10
Enterprises
Redwood RunMyJobs
Redwood RunMyJobs
Score 9.6 out of 10
Redwood RunMyJobs
Redwood RunMyJobs
Score 9.6 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Apache AirflowTidal by Redwood
Likelihood to Recommend
9.1
(0 ratings)
7.4
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
-
(0 ratings)
2.0
(0 ratings)
Usability
10.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Apache AirflowTidal by Redwood
Likelihood to Recommend
For a quick job scanning of status and deep-diving into job issues, details, and flows, AirFlow does a good job. No fuss, no muss. The low learning curve as the UI is very straightforward, and navigating it will be familiar after spending some time using it. Our requirements are pretty simple. Job scheduler, workflows, and monitoring. The jobs we run are >100, but still is a lot to review and troubleshoot when jobs don't run. So when managing large jobs, AirFlow dated UI can be a bit of a drawback.
Read full review
1. Tidal Automation is a super robust application for Regular SQL tasks or other file maintenance which in-turn can help employee's to free up their time which they spend on working on repetitive tasks. 2.This has significantly reduced the time and effort required for setting up and managing workflows, ultimately increasing productivity. 3. Although we faced few problems while integrating the software with existing systems and was time consuming.
Read full review
Pros
  • Apache Airflow is one of the best Orchestration platforms and a go-to scheduler for teams building a data platform or pipelines.
  • Apache Airflow supports multiple operators, such as the Databricks, Spark, and Python operators. All of these provide us with functionality to implement any business logic.
  • Apache Airflow is highly scalable, and we can run a large number of DAGs with ease. It provided HA and replication for workers. Maintaining airflow deployments is very easy, even for smaller teams, and we also get lots of metrics for observability.
Read full review
  • Tidal Automation is good in it's integration with Oracle ERP
  • Tidal Automation was robust enough to perform all the workloads smoothly on SAP Integrations.
  • Tidal Automation has the robust HA and DR features
  • Tidal Automation has the best and simple user interface.
  • Tidal Automation documentation is the best compared to other Workload Automation solutions in the market.
Read full review
Cons
  • A local "dry run" or IDE plugin that can validate and simulate DAG execution without needing a full environment.
  • Better feedback on DAG parse errors in the UI or CLI.
  • Navigating large DAGs with hundreds of tasks can be slow and hard to understand visually.
Read full review
  • Still a bit slow when navigating. If you close a job you have to wait a few seconds to open another one. Even when you made no changes.
  • When viewing a job and make no changes, the "ok" button changes the last modified date as if you made a change. No big deal, but wastes time when troubleshooting a problem and looking into what jobs were changed last.
  • You can see the parameters column in the "job activity", but not in "Job definitions".
  • Can't search the parameters field in the filter.
  • Changing a variable name does not change it on the job. It still works because Tidal Automation uses the ID number. It just causes confusion when you see a variable on a job and can't find the variable under "Variables". On top of that, Tidal Automation does not show the ID column under "Variables" making it even more difficult to find the variable.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
No answers on this topic
We are on the fence. The increased pricing for renewals is staggering. With new automation options like Microsoft's Power Automate and Event Driven Ansible on the field, there are other options now available.
Read full review
Usability
For its capability to connect with multicloud environments. Access Control management is something that we don't get in all the schedulers and orchestrators. But although it provides so many flexibility and options to due to python , some level of knowledge of python is needed to be able to build workflows.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Implementation Rating
No answers on this topic
Having provided consulting services for years on Tidal by Redwood, I recommend going with a solutions partner or consultant to deploy it. I believe there are sizing and tuning guidelines that should be followed for environments of scale. I believe they are not critical when first lighting up the product, but if you are not aware of them you will encounter performance degradation after a few thousand job objects are added.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Apache Airflow is suited for a much wider set of use cases compared to Databricks. You can run it anywhere, and there is also no vendor lock-in. With Airflow, we can utilize almost any compute engine. Same thing we want to do with Databricks. There might be some level of difficulty based on the support.
Read full review
Tidal by Redwood excels at performing complex workflows, event-driven automation, and compliance-focused procedures in big companies with varied IT infrastructures. This includes claims, policy, and billing processes are included in this. The sending of our documents and checks to our printers for automatic printing has also been automated with TA. The majority of our regular file transfers to and from our company are done utilizing TA and SFTP. Key characteristics:- Control over access and security. Resource management and error correction. Tools for reporting and observing. Capacity for extensive automation and job scheduling. Scalability for large enterprises. Orchestration of workflow for intricate operations. Uses:- A good fit for big businesses with complicated IT environments. Ideal for managing dependencies and automating complex operations. effective at organizing cross-platform and system functions. strong support for governance and compliance.
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • Most of the ETL processes were automated, cutting down on human labor.
  • Apache Airflow's user interface (UI) was very informative and straightforward.
  • Since ETL processes were providing data via airflow, we were able to gain a deeper comprehension of the data at hand.
Read full review
  • It has a positive impact on factors like increase in productivity, easy to implement as there some options pre-built in it which automates and perform.
  • It also reduces human error mostly as it involve less manual performance and tool is time saving in this perspective.
  • It also has negative impacts like cost of the tool as its expensive and if it's not properly utilized it may lead huge revenue loss as all will be scheduled per plan.
  • We have to continually monitor its effectiveness to ensure a positive return on investment.
Read full review
ScreenShots