Apache Ant vs. Liquibase

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Apache Ant
Score 8.0 out of 10
N/A
Apache Ant is a Java library and command-line tool whose mission is to drive processes described in build files as targets and extension points dependent upon each other. The main known usage of Ant is the build of Java applications. Ant supplies a number of built-in tasks allowing to compile, assemble, test and run Java applications.N/A
Liquibase
Score 8.0 out of 10
Enterprise companies (1,001+ employees)
Liquibase is a database change management tool that extends DevOps best practices to the database, helping teams release software faster and safer by bringing the database change process into existing CI/CD automation. According to the 2021 Accelerate State of DevOps Report, elite performers are 3.4 times more likely to incorporate database change management into their process than low performers. Liquibase value proposition: Liquibase speeds up the development…N/A
Pricing
Apache AntLiquibase
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Apache AntLiquibase
Free Trial
NoYes
Free/Freemium Version
NoYes
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Apache AntLiquibase
Considered Both Products
Apache Ant
Chose Apache Ant
Compare to other tools like eclipse or Jenkins, Apache Ant is really easy to use tool. and It is very flexible tool which can be learn in couple of days time. And Apache ant help to write the custom java based hooks which enable more capabilities and features in the application.
Liquibase
Chose Liquibase
flyway use sql for defining change but Liquidbase provides flexibility to specify change in different formats including sql such as xml, yaml and json
Chose Liquibase
With Flyway you need to Write rollback scripts manually. With Liquibase we have a lot of customization with to rollback with options such rollback-one-changeset or rollback-one-update.
Chose Liquibase
Liquibase supports a wide range of database management systems (DBMS) including MySQL, PostgreSQL, Oracle, SQL Server, and more. It is written in Java and offers command-line, XML, YAML, and JSON configurations. where as Alembic is primarily targeted at SQLAlchemy users, which …
Chose Liquibase
There is no real competitor when it comes to what Liquibase does - at least not at the time we considered it three years ago. It was an easy choice in this regard, but we could have said no to it if it made our workload more difficult. But our proof of concept showed there were …
Chose Liquibase
Utilized ADO Repos to create DDL/DML scripts and run thru CI/CD pipeline
Chose Liquibase
We adopted Liquibase to complete our Ci/Cd scenarios. Without Liquibase, DB changes were out to scope in our DevOps scenarios. Log and accountability are more clear now.
Chose Liquibase
Liquibase provide rollback feature more matured than others.
Chose Liquibase
We evaluated none of the ones mentioned in this list.
Chose Liquibase
Liquibase makes it easy to integrate into CI/CD pipelines, keeping the database and code in sync. The switch from one database management system to another is made easier by modeling the structure of the database in DBMS-independent XML rather than SQL. A user-friendly web …
Chose Liquibase
Liquibase is much more powerful compared to Flyway since it is much more flexible in nature. You can apply changes programmatically, works with any kind of database and provides features version controlling database schemas. All these features were missing in Flyway and that's …
Chose Liquibase
To be honest, the option of having a free community plan to start testing in a test environment, followed by taking it in production a few months is a great way to evaluate wether or not to do the subscription based plan.
Chose Liquibase
We didn't try any other products.
Chose Liquibase
I didn't encounter similair or competitor product
Chose Liquibase
Liquibase is preferred over Flyway if your engineers doesn’t have knowledge in the DDL language used in each database product supported. If you only need to support a single database product and your engineers have the skills I would recommend Flyway instead. Liquibase is …
Chose Liquibase
Both liquibase and Flyway help you deploy database changes associated with new application deployments. They will both help with reducing database administration tasks and ensure reliability of the application service. Comparing Liquibase and Flyway, I found liquibase to be …
Chose Liquibase
These other products were for infrastucture as code and not as well-suited for managing database changes; instead Liquibase was more oriented towards it and was easier to pick up its syntax also.
Chose Liquibase
Liquibase is head and shoulders better than relying on SQL Compare alone for deployments. I haven't used Flyway, but based on our evaluation, Liquibase seemed to have a lot of functional overlap for considerably less cost. I would recommend the use of GitHub or BitBucket in …
Chose Liquibase
At the time, Liquibase offered a community version and I think Flyway didn’t. In our case, we did not have any previous experience with any database management tools, so we just went with what was free to try out.
Best Alternatives
Apache AntLiquibase
Small Businesses
GitLab
GitLab
Score 8.7 out of 10
DBeaver
DBeaver
Score 9.2 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
GitLab
GitLab
Score 8.7 out of 10
DBeaver
DBeaver
Score 9.2 out of 10
Enterprises
GitLab
GitLab
Score 8.7 out of 10
DBeaver
DBeaver
Score 9.2 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Apache AntLiquibase
Likelihood to Recommend
8.0
(0 ratings)
8.0
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
-
(0 ratings)
9.1
(0 ratings)
Usability
-
(0 ratings)
9.1
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
-
(0 ratings)
7.4
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
-
(0 ratings)
9.1
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Apache AntLiquibase
Likelihood to Recommend
Apache Ant is suitable for the scenarios where central repository is not required for your developed application and It has a great architecture with less complexity and the situation where automated configuration is needed then Apache Ant is not suitable for that use case. Apache Ant is easy to use tool.
Read full review
Any Codebase that does schema or table changes all the time for development or where Development and code is mostly in the database or SQL liquibase is a must. In a codebase where the database is pretty static or is just a place to dump data, liquibase is probably too much. You also need to have a team for it to really make sense. Doing a solo or small team project doing full version control on the database is probably more overhead than it is worth.
Read full review
Pros
  • Support non java application development as well
  • Flexible
  • XML scripting
  • Support any platform
Read full review
  • Liquibase provides a clear error log that allows us to pinpoint what to troubleshoot.
  • The service does not deploy bad data, which helps us keep our databases clean.
  • Liquibase works with GitHub Actions as well as AWS Codebuild and AWS Lambda. The flexibility allows us to deploy the service in many different ways.
Read full review
Cons
  • Better lifecycle management can be done
  • So much configuration details needs to provide
  • Order of the flow needs to define in advance
Read full review
  • Reducing Compatibility issues, when we upgraded Liquibase from 4.2 to 4.9. The same changeset which we were able to run on successfully using 4.2, part of it was now failing when tried to deploy using 4.9
  • We are not able to see detailed logs (for different changes) in uDeploy when deploying changes through Liquibase
  • Liquibase should rollback the if any one of the changes fails.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
No answers on this topic
We are and will continue using Liquibase and it has become an integral part of our portfolio offering, any new product is by default adopting Liquibase stack.
Read full review
Usability
No answers on this topic
the database deployments helped teams with a increased productivity,
faster delivery and low risk.
Read full review
Support Rating
No answers on this topic
Liquibase's customer support team has been very instrumental in helping us drive the whole Database CI/CD initiative. We have always received very quick resolution to our queries or any roadblock we hit. Right from setting up Liquibase in our environment to this date the Liquibase team has always helped us deliver quality and innovative solutions.
Read full review
Implementation Rating
No answers on this topic
Build process takes a toll.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Compare to other tools like Eclipse or Jenkins, Apache Ant is really easy to use tool. and It is very flexible tool which can be learn in couple of days time. And Apache ant help to write the custom java based hooks which enable more capabilities and features in the application
Read full review
In my previous project and organization I have used Flyway for database change management and version control similar to Liquibase which I am currently using. Comparing it with Flyway, Liquibase provides more feature flexibility and enhancements to handle complex workflows with rollback capability and its usage of contexts and labels allow us to target changes to specific environments, which Flyway doesn’t support natively. Also Liquibase provides way to compare different schema and generate changelogs for syncing environments automatically where in it allows to have declarative schema management by using XML/YAML/SQL script format.
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • Overall positive impact
  • Speed up the development process
  • Easy deployment process
Read full review
  • We are still in the early phases, where the costs are potentially greater than the benefit. Trying to get Liquibase integrated into a pipeline has taken time investment and required some trial and error.
  • We are still a relatively small shop with a relatively small number of schema changes (perhaps 1 every week or so). As such, we aren't at a place where we couldn't have managed control of this without a tool. However, there is no doubt that investing in a tool at this stage was the right move. Now we have established guidelines and a pattern for how to do schema changes in a way that will make things easily scalable as we continue to grow.
Read full review
ScreenShots