TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    Apache Camel

    Score6.3 out of 10
    N/AApache Camel is an open source integration platform.N/A
    Pricing
    Apache Camel
    Editions & Modules
    No answers on this topic
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    Apache Camel
    Free Trial
    No
    Free/Freemium Version
    No
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    No
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup fee
    Additional Details
    More Pricing Information
    Community Pulse
    Apache Camel
    Considered Both Products
    Apache
    Chose Apache Camel
    Easier to use, better routing system, but perhaps too basic dependant on business needs?
    Incentivized
    Chose Apache Camel
    If you are looking for a Java-based open source low cost equivalent to webMethods or Azure Logic Apps, Apache Camel is an excellent choice as it is mature and widely deployed, and included in many vendored Java application servers too such as Redhat JBoss EAP. Apache Camel is …
    Incentivized
    Chose Apache Camel
    working with Apache's TomCat server, our developer found it most easy given the UI of Camel to perform integration and data processing tasks. when compared to the other two softwares they felt the need to learn new tools outside of Apache family can be avoided and with kafka, …
    Incentivized
    Chose Apache Camel
    WebSphere Message Broker - Expensive, old, hard to use, bad connectors
    Mulesoft - Very similar to Camel, but expensive and buggy
    Incentivized
    Chose Apache Camel
    We did a comparison of the two products with an example application that tested about 10 distinct EIP pattern. We wrote Camel in XML and Java DSL and SI in XML. This was about 3 years ago. At the time, I found the threading model in SI to be more intuitive and Camel's seda. …
    Incentivized
    Chose Apache Camel
    Akka or Spring Integration/ XD are alternatives to Apache Camel and very good frameworks on their own (especially Akka which provides a single threaded illusion).
    Incentivized
    Chose Apache Camel
    We chose Apache Camel because it was lightweight, easy to get started with and because it had a groovy DSL since we were a grails shop when we started using it.
    Incentivized
    Chose Apache Camel
    Apache Camel has been the integration framework of choice, but I was not the person to make the decision to use it. Compared to other competing products like Tibco Business Works, etc., it is free and open source and its licensing policy is acceptable to the management of Cox.
    Incentivized
    Chose Apache Camel
    Esper is only similar in that they both are involved in complex even processing, however Esper's aim is a little more complex and specialized. In general however I found Apache Camel to be much easier to understand, implement and debug, whereas Esper's DSL can get very …
    Incentivized
    Key User Insights
    Would buy again
    No answers on this topic
    Delivers good value for the price
    No answers on this topic
    Happy with the feature set
    No answers on this topic
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    No answers on this topic
    Implementation went as expected
    No answers on this topic
    User Ratings
    Apache Camel
    Likelihood to Recommend
    7.9
    (11 ratings)