TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Apache HTTP Server vs. Oracle WebLogic Server

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    Apache HTTP Server

    Score8.4 out of 10
    N/AApache Web Server (Apache HTTP Server) is an open source HTTP web server for modern operating systems including UNIX and Windows.N/A

    Oracle WebLogic Server

    Score7.4 out of 10
    N/AOracle WebLogic Server is a unified and extensible platform for developing, deploying and running enterprise applications, such as Java, for on-premises and in the cloud. WebLogic Server offers a scalable implementation of Java Enterprise Edition (EE) and Jakarta EE.N/A
    Pricing
    Apache HTTP ServerOracle WebLogic Server
    Editions & Modules
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    Apache HTTP ServerOracle WebLogic Server
    Free Trial
    NoNo
    Free/Freemium Version
    NoNo
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoNo
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
    Additional Details——
    More Pricing Information
    Community Pulse
    Apache HTTP ServerOracle WebLogic Server
    Considered Both Products
    Apache
    Chose Apache HTTP Server
    The comparison with other products from IBM or Oracle is difficult. These are mostly software that has to be paid for. The only fair comparison at eye level is probably the NGINX web server: It is also free and offers even higher performance. In the meantime, there is also a …
    Incentivized
    Chose Apache HTTP Server
    Oracle WebLogic /Tuxedo is great when you are using it to install Oracle stack on top including other Oracle middleware and applications. Similarly, if you have IBM applications that need to be configured with IBM DB2, IBM WebSphere is better than Apache Web Server. Red Hat …
    Incentivized
    Oracle
    Chose Oracle WebLogic Server
    Compared to the alternatives, Weblogic is on the heavier side and requires more configuration to get it running. Instance startup time is also relatively long, but this could be due to the application size deployed on the server. Licensing cost for WebLogic would also be higher …
    Incentivized
    Chose Oracle WebLogic Server
    JBoss and Apache Tomcat application servers are open source and cost less, however I do not find them as sophisticated enough to handle the various critical functionality used at US Cellular corporation. WebLogic stands way ahead in the way it provides opportunities for …
    Incentivized
    Chose Oracle WebLogic Server
    WebLogic is clearly more powerful than Tomcat, but it's also better than JBoss, since it gives more configuration options, and the administration console is absolutely the best I've ever seen. On the other side, for small applications Tomcat is more lightweight, and more …
    Incentivized
    Key User Insights
    Would buy again
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Delivers good value for the price
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Happy with the feature set
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Implementation went as expected
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Features
    Apache HTTP ServerOracle WebLogic Server
    Application Servers
    Comparison of Application Servers features of Apache HTTP Server and Oracle WebLogic Server
    Feature
    Apache HTTP Server
    -
    Ratings
    Oracle WebLogic Server
    8.1
    36 Ratings
    IDE support00 Ratings6.032 Ratings
    Security management00 Ratings9.034 Ratings
    Administration and management00 Ratings7.136 Ratings
    Application server performance00 Ratings8.535 Ratings
    Installation00 Ratings8.036 Ratings
    Open-source standards compliance00 Ratings10.024 Ratings
    User Ratings
    Apache HTTP ServerOracle WebLogic Server
    Likelihood to Recommend
    8.0
    (20 ratings)
    7.5
    (43 ratings)
    Likelihood to Renew
    -
    (0 ratings)
    9.0
    (1 ratings)
    Usability
    -
    (0 ratings)
    7.0
    (3 ratings)
    Performance
    -
    (0 ratings)
    9.0
    (1 ratings)
    Support Rating
    9.3
    (2 ratings)
    6.0
    (1 ratings)
    Ease of integration
    -
    (0 ratings)
    9.0
    (1 ratings)