Apache JMeter vs. SoapUI Open Source, supported by SmartBear

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
JMeter
Score 9.3 out of 10
N/A
JMeter, from Apache, is a load and performance testing tool.N/A
SoapUI Open Source
Score 8.6 out of 10
N/A
SoapUI is an open source API testing tool supported by SmartBear's community, supporting functional and performance testing of APIs.N/A
Pricing
Apache JMeterSoapUI Open Source, supported by SmartBear
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
JMeterSoapUI Open Source
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
YesNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Apache JMeterSoapUI Open Source, supported by SmartBear
Considered Both Products
JMeter
Chose JMeter
Postman is really more about API testing, and was never aimed at performance/monitoring the way Apache JMeter does. If you find someone trying to use postman this way... show them the way!
Chose JMeter
More threads supported, open-source, more reliable, and easy to work with. The User interface is very elegant and simple to use, as compared to other competitors.
Chose JMeter
It is very costlier than Jmeter to manager for a multi-seat license. All company does not procure the license for costlier tools. Maintaining Load Runner scripts is difficult than JMeter scripts. You need skill resources to create and maintain the Loadrunner scripts and tools. …
Chose JMeter
Although Selenium is designed for automating real-world tests in browser and JMeter is designed to perform load testing, in some cases, JMeter based tests may be enough to verify application functionality. These products don't directly compete with each other and it should be …
Chose JMeter
SoapUI is a bit easier to get rolling for people without development skills but if you have people with development skills JMeter shines. JMeter also uses significantly fewer resources on the client so you can be sure your testing isn’t restricted by the client machine.
Chose JMeter
Best open-source performance testing tool. JMeter has no alternative for performance testing. It is really easy to record and enhance scripts using this tool. It provides lots of free plugins which gives us much flexibility. It can be executed using GUI or non-GUI. Good tool …
Chose JMeter
It's very easy GUI helps the tester to perform various testing scenarios. Easy to configure test cases and modules which has proper and well-maintained documentation. Its an excellent tool for performance testing and running a variety of load tests, stress tests, and longevity …
Chose JMeter
The main and best thing is that it's an open source tool with the biggest community worldwide.
Chose JMeter
The recorder provided by JMeter is ok and if your team has no idea about programming you can use it to test your web apps without writing any code.
Chose JMeter
It has very powerful capabilities and for free!!! It's ease of use and installation and easy to get started are highlights. A lot of community support and youtube videos from JMeter developers to help you understand various functionalities within JMeter to support you. You can …
Chose JMeter
Jmeter is better for projecting a path to look into. Crystal only allows you to pull the specific data and display a set of data that you request. Jmeter allows you to feel out the direction the data is going as you go. Crystal also can have issues with graphing data correctly.
Chose JMeter
I have evaluated LOADUI (web free version) and it was a very unstable tool and I could not rely on those results completely as I was not sure how the tool was performing. It only generated the top 10 less transaction times and when Jmeter was in use, it was very effective in …
Chose JMeter
LoadRunner and Silk Test were the tools I used in the past to compare with JMeter. I thought LoadRunner had a more commercial appearance and it comes with HP support from your service provider. It also comes at a steep price. JMeter and LoadRunner have a similar learning curve …
Chose JMeter
It is best open source tool available in the market . Also it is easy to train resources and is also very useful for integration testing.
Chose JMeter
We found BlazeMeter's service to fit great with our JMeter scripts, since they execute our JMeter scripts and provide excellent reporting tools and graphs, besides multi region and infrastructure to support different configurations of multiple concurrent users. I have used HP …
Chose JMeter
No licensing issue. Many blogs provide the issue noticed and resolution for the same hence no need to pay heavy maintenance fees.
Chose JMeter
I have used LoadStorm. But, with JMeter we have advantages for it being open source, as lot of our clients don't have the budget to invest in tools. It can be used to write complex scripts, multithreading framework allows concurrent sampling by many threads and simultaneous …
Chose JMeter
JMeter has a lot more functionality than Selenum. Also JMeter is better for backend or API testing, while Selenium is good for UI tests.
Chose JMeter
NeoLoad is far ahead of JMeter in terms of reporting and user interface, the turn around time is less compared to JMeter as there are enough experts in market.
Chose JMeter
Java script friendly.
Chose JMeter
Besides JMeter, we've looked at WebLOAD and Gatling. Our organization used to use WebLOAD and we switched to JMeter at our division for its ease of use and configurability compared to WebLOAD. However, we will eventually switch to Gatling because Gatling provides greater …
Chose JMeter
Gatling is the future. JMeter is good, Gatling is better.
SoapUI Open Source
Chose SoapUI Open Source
SoapUI Open Source is free, which is good for light use or simple things here and there. There is a Pro version that makes things more user-friendly. I also like that custom code can also be used for doing more complicated tasks.
I like that SoapUI can have a process/flow …
Chose SoapUI Open Source
Compared to SoapUI, we have been using "light" tools like RestClient extension in Firefox, or Postman.

Compared to Postman, SoapUI is more simple for WSDL / SOAP webservices, as SoapUI generate all envelop, but Postman does not.
Chose SoapUI Open Source
Every application has its own features and UI design but SoapUI is also very good at testing. All features are awesome.
Features
Apache JMeterSoapUI Open Source, supported by SmartBear
Load Testing
Comparison of Load Testing features of Product A and Product B
Apache JMeter
7.5
Ratings
11% below category average
SoapUI Open Source, supported by SmartBear
-
Ratings
End to end performance management9.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Integrated performance data8.90 Ratings00 Ratings
Deployment model flexibility6.30 Ratings00 Ratings
Real time monitoring8.90 Ratings00 Ratings
Automated anomaly detection4.40 Ratings00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Apache JMeterSoapUI Open Source, supported by SmartBear
Small Businesses

No answers on this topic

BrowserStack
BrowserStack
Score 8.6 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
ReadyAPI
ReadyAPI
Score 7.0 out of 10
ReadyAPI
ReadyAPI
Score 7.0 out of 10
Enterprises
ReadyAPI
ReadyAPI
Score 7.0 out of 10
ReadyAPI
ReadyAPI
Score 7.0 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Apache JMeterSoapUI Open Source, supported by SmartBear
Likelihood to Recommend
8.1
(0 ratings)
8.0
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
8.6
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Usability
9.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Availability
1.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Performance
8.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
10.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Online Training
1.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Apache JMeterSoapUI Open Source, supported by SmartBear
Likelihood to Recommend
The key questions I would pose are: how high of a concurrent load do you need to generate against the system? How technically skilled are your personnel that will perform the load testing? How much programmable/scripting/code based control do you desire from the tool? Do you prefer more of a GUI based tool or a programmatic code/scripting based tool? JMeter will be for those that want a GUI, moderate to low scripting/code based control/programmability, moderate to low load generation, and for users experienced in the novice to expert range.
Read full review
If you are making system upgrade project and you have existing system working and you want to imitate messages that are going in production but without making any data loads or switch it’s very suitable and convenient software. It serves well in manual test scenarios but wouldn’t be as good in case of mass tests.
Read full review
Pros
  • Easy to construct Webservices script - You just need to add a sampler with the endpoint, payload and header information. And boom you can run a load test on the service with varying load and capture the response time and throughput. In a commercial tool like Loadrunner or Silkperformer, this process would take at least couple of hours, while with Jmeter we can do this in 10 minutes or less.
  • Modularizing the scripts - Jmeter has a very good way of organizing the scripts and the reusability of the existing script (transactions) is also as easy as copy pasting the script.
  • Jmeter tests can be run from anywhere, so you can run it from the idle webserver itself if you have some firewall restrictions to test it from your local or other environment.
  • Jmeter distributed tests can be spawn from the AWS and results collated to see the performance from different regions in the world.
Read full review
  • SOAP
  • REST
  • Authentication
Read full review
Cons
  • Even though it has very easy installation, you can run into issues easily. I was ab;e to trigger a test at browser level but couldn't stop the tests. I had to kill it from task manager and then had to reinstall from begining.
  • There are so many things in JMeter you can do especially with the sampler for selenium for UI tests. More documentation/webinars etc.. would help the community better.
  • The jmx files should have an easy way to be integrated with ci/cd tools and cloud.
Read full review
  • I actually like SoapUI as it is, I have not found things to improve, except for the speed of response is very complex services.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Price, Wiki and user sharing. Having access to the information provided by the developers and other open source providers is key for me. The ability to share information and get answers directly is very important to success in software testing. And the price of this product currently is amazing. Too many companies charge way too much money for products that are far behind in their value and pertinence
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Usability
I can jump right into a new test plan and start building from scratch. The natural progression from test plan to thread group and then designing the basic format of the process is very streamlined and smooth. With only slight modifications I can build out a very complex model from a very basic beginning.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
I have been using JMeter for the last year. By using this tool, you can make sure the system will work under varied loads. It helps us to simulate real time scenarios by creating required virtual users and make sure the application will work under load. Perform load, stress, and stability testing using JMeter.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
I have evaluated LOADUI (web free version) and it was a very unstable tool and I could not rely on those results completely as I was not sure how the tool was performing. It only generated the top 10 less transaction times and when Jmeter was in use, it was very effective in using plugins to accommodate more outputs.
Read full review
SoapUI Open Source is free, which is good for light use or simple things here and there. There is a Pro version that makes things more user-friendly. I also like that custom code can also be used for doing more complicated tasks. I like that SoapUI can have a process/flow (conditional/loop/waits/etc.) set up for scripting purposes, which is good for beginners and light users. However, I think the user interface has room for improvement.
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • It helped to estimate resources required for a particular client requirement. For example if the client wants the application to be used by 500 users for 1 hour, based on the load test we perform for 500 users and 1 hour we recommend resources and their capabilities.
  • Jmeter was used to identify bottleneck. This would lead to better performance.
  • Jmeter was used to identify failures as well.
Read full review
  • Testing resolves most of the issues in the development phases.
  • User friendliness of the app makes it good.
  • Overall client happiness depends on the clean project, which is possible by testing.
Read full review
ScreenShots