Apache Spark vs. IBM Cloud Pak for Data

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Apache Spark
Score 9.2 out of 10
N/A
Apache Spark is a multi-language engine for executing data engineering, data science, and machine learning on single-node machines or clusters.N/A
IBM Cloud Pak for Data
Score 8.6 out of 10
N/A
IBM Cloud Pak for Data (formerly IBM Cloud Private for Data) provides data management, data governance, and automated data discovery and classification.N/A
Pricing
Apache SparkIBM Cloud Pak for Data
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Apache SparkIBM Cloud Pak for Data
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Apache SparkIBM Cloud Pak for Data
Considered Both Products
Apache Spark
Chose Apache Spark
We used Surprise Kit for one of the other research works. It is more fine-tuned to Recommendation systems and their algorithms. Apache Spark has MLlib for majority of ML problems. Where as software like Surprse Kit - it suitable for a specific task of Recommendations only.
Chose Apache Spark
Apache Spark is a fast-processing in-memory computing framework. It is 10 times faster than Apache Hadoop. Earlier we were using Apache Hadoop for processing data on the disk but now we are shifted to Apache Spark because of its in-memory computation capability. Also in SAP …
Chose Apache Spark
Other teams used to work on Apache Hadoop but our team started with Apache Spark directly.
Chose Apache Spark
There are a few alternatives that can do the same transformation and aggregation like Apache Spark can do but most of them are not able to perform parallel computation. For example, pandas is a really good tool to do that but not parallelized; However, there are some tools that …
Chose Apache Spark
  • Apache Spark works in distributed mode using cluster
  • Informatica and Datastage cannot scale horizontally
  • We can write custom code in spark, whereas in Datastage and Informatica we can only choose the different features proivided already.
Chose Apache Spark
Apache Spark has much more better performance and features if we compare with Hive or map/reduce kind of solutions. Spark has many other features for machine learning, streaming.
Chose Apache Spark
Spark is simply awesome to work on with any data sets and also has an in-memory database which makes it very flexible.
Chose Apache Spark
1. Apache Spark is almost 100 % faster than Hadoop.
2. Apache Spark is more stable than Amazon EMR.
3. The end to end distributed machine library is more robust in Apache Spark.
Chose Apache Spark
Databricks uses Spark as a foundation, and is also a great platform. It does bring several add-ons, which we did not feel needed by the time we evaluated - and haven't needed since then. One interesting plus in our opinion was the engineering support, which is great depending …
Chose Apache Spark
It is easy to learn, read and to maintain. It brings the best of the Ruby on Rails framework from Java that helps to create a web service so easily. Communication is one of the most distinctive features of Apache Spark compared to alternative products. You are able to …
Chose Apache Spark
We evaluated SAS alongside with Apache Spark but during the course of proof of concept found that Apache Spark was able to support the hadoop eco-system and hadoop file system much better. It was much faster at that time while having the ability to process data quickly for the …
Chose Apache Spark
I prefer Apache Spark compared to Hadoop, since in my experience Spark has more usability and comes equipped with simple APIs for Scala, Python, Java and Spark SQL, as well as provides feedback in REPL format on the commands. At the same time, Apache Spark seems to have the …
Chose Apache Spark
All the above systems work quite well on big data transformations whereas Spark really shines with its bigger API support and its ability to read from and write to multiple data sources. Using Spark one can easily switch between declarative versus imperative versus functional …
Chose Apache Spark
Even with Python, MapReduce is lengthy coding. Combination of Python with Apache Spark will not only shorten the code, but it will effectively increase the speed of algorithms. Occasionally, I use MapReduce, but Apache Spark will replace MapReduce very soon. It has many …
Chose Apache Spark
vs MapRedce, it was faster and easier to manage. Especially for Machine Learning, where MapReduce is lacking. Also Apache Storm was slower and didn't scale as much as Spark does. Spark elasticity was easier to apply compared to storm and MapReduce.
managing resources for …
Chose Apache Spark
We specifically choose Spark over MapReduce to make the cluster processing faster
Chose Apache Spark
Spark in comparison to similar technologies ends up being a one stop shop. You can achieve so much with this one framework instead of having to stitch and weave multiple technologies from the Hadoop stack, all while getting incredibility performance, minimal boilerplate, and …
Chose Apache Spark
Apache Pig and Apache Hive provide most of the things spark provide but apache spark has more features like actions and transformations which are easy to code. Spark uses optimization technique as we can select driver program and manipulate DAG (Directed Acyclic Graph)
Python …
Chose Apache Spark
There are a few newer frameworks for general processing like Flink, Beam, frameworks for streaming like Samza and Storm, and traditional Map-Reduce. I think Spark is at a sweet spot where its clearly better than Map-Reduce for many workflows yet has gotten a good amount of …
Chose Apache Spark
Spark has primarily replaced my use of writing pure Hadoop MapReduce or Apache Pig jobs for processing data. I like the fact that I can alternate between the main programming languages that I know - Java and Python - and use those to learn the Scala API. Spark also can be …
IBM Cloud Pak for Data
Chose IBM Cloud Pak for Data
IBM has healing mechanisms when resource usage is high. This platform performs well, but when it runs out of capacity, it has crashed for many clients. This is innate in its original design.
Chose IBM Cloud Pak for Data
Generally this tool has been very helpful and innovative because increase our workflow and collaboration using integrated multi-cloud platform. It also enables us to deploy in any flexible way like on-premises or cloud which saves time and hard disk space. It also enables us to …
Chose IBM Cloud Pak for Data
better inbuilt integration with many system to store data from multiple application to run matured AI/ML solution, which will give prediction for utility service , SAP DI solution was not stable enough , faced
Chose IBM Cloud Pak for Data
IBM Cloud Pak for Data takes the IBM cognos solution and provides this on an enterprise cloud platform that can be extended to support better data integration and data science capabilities.
Best Alternatives
Apache SparkIBM Cloud Pak for Data
Small Businesses

No answers on this topic

Egnyte
Egnyte
Score 9.6 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Cloudera Manager
Cloudera Manager
Score 9.9 out of 10
IBM InfoSphere Information Server
IBM InfoSphere Information Server
Score 8.0 out of 10
Enterprises
IBM Analytics Engine
IBM Analytics Engine
Score 7.1 out of 10
IBM InfoSphere Information Server
IBM InfoSphere Information Server
Score 8.0 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Apache SparkIBM Cloud Pak for Data
Likelihood to Recommend
9.0
(0 ratings)
9.9
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
10.0
(0 ratings)
9.1
(0 ratings)
Usability
8.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
8.7
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Apache SparkIBM Cloud Pak for Data
Likelihood to Recommend
Apache Spark has rich APIs for regular data transformations or for ML workloads or for graph workloads, whereas other systems may not such a wide range of support. Choose it when you need to perform data transformations for big data as offline jobs, whereas use MongoDB-like distributed database systems for more realtime queries.
Read full review
Unlike others analytics tool IBM Cloud Pak for Data provides out-of-the-box privacy, model interpretability and fairness monitoring, along with automatic explanation of data and models written in business language. It's a great tool that all business should emulate. Great user experience because of every feature is functional and improved constantly.
Read full review
Pros
  • It performs a conventional disk-based process when the data sets are too large to fit into memory, which is very useful because, regardless of the size of the data, it is always possible to store them.
  • It has great speed and ability to join multiple types of databases and run different types of analysis applications. This functionality is super useful as it reduces work times
  • Apache Spark uses the data storage model of Hadoop and can be integrated with other big data frameworks such as HBase, MongoDB, and Cassandra. This is very useful because it is compatible with multiple frameworks that the company has, and thus allows us to unify all the processes.
Read full review
  • The AI services catalog like the Watson Assistant is very good.
  • The analytics dashboard featuring all the recent history is very good with IBM.
  • Searching for data through the unified search option is super cool.
Read full review
Cons
  • Memory management. Very weak on that.
  • PySpark not as robust as scala with spark.
  • spark master HA is needed. Not as HA as it should be.
  • Locality should not be a necessity, but does help improvement. But would prefer no locality
Read full review
  • It is complex; The platform comes with several features from MLOPs to Customer 360 which may take a long time for the user to understand.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Capacity of computing data in cluster and fast speed.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Usability
If the team looking to use Apache Spark is not used to debug and tweak settings for jobs to ensure maximum optimizations, it can be frustrating. However, the documentation and the support of the community on the internet can help resolve most issues. Moreover, it is highly configurable and it integrates with different tools (eg: it can be used by dbt core), which increase the scenarios where it can be used
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
1. It integrates very well with scala or python. 2. It's very easy to understand SQL interoperability. 3. Apache is way faster than the other competitive technologies. 4. The support from the Apache community is very huge for Spark. 5. Execution times are faster as compared to others. 6. There are a large number of forums available for Apache Spark. 7. The code availability for Apache Spark is simpler and easy to gain access to. 8. Many organizations use Apache Spark, so many solutions are available for existing applications.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
We used Surprise Kit for one of the other research works. It is more fine-tuned to Recommendation systems and their algorithms. Apache Spark has MLlib for majority of ML problems. Where as software like Surprse Kit - it suitable for a specific task of Recommendations only
Read full review
IBM has healing mechanisms when resource usage is high. This platform performs well, but when it runs out of capacity, it has crashed for many clients. This is innate in its original design
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • Faster turn around on feature development, we have seen a noticeable improvement in our agile development since using Spark.
  • Easy adoption, having multiple departments use the same underlying technology even if the use cases are very different allows for more commonality amongst applications which definitely makes the operations team happy.
  • Performance, we have been able to make some applications run over 20x faster since switching to Spark. This has saved us time, headaches, and operating costs.
Read full review
  • can improve readiness for cloud migration, improve licensing flexibility with IBM, and reduce both hardware purchases and infrastructure management efforts.
  • reduces the expenses of internal resources.
  • should improve efficiencies, reduce risks, and increase performance
Read full review
ScreenShots