| Product | Rating | Most Used By | Product Summary | Starting Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
 Apache Tomcat | Score7.8 out of 10 | N/A | Tomcat is an open-source web server supported by Apache. | N/A |
 Oracle GlassFish Server | Score9 out of 10 | N/A | Oracle GlassFish Server was originally developed by Sun Microsystems and is available open source or supported by Oracle. It is an application server. | N/A |
| Apache Tomcat | Oracle GlassFish Server | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Editions & Modules | No answers on this topic | No answers on this topic | ||||||||||||||
| Offerings |
| |||||||||||||||
| Entry-level Setup Fee | No setup fee | No setup fee | ||||||||||||||
| Additional Details | — | — | ||||||||||||||
| More Pricing Information | ||||||||||||||||
| Apache Tomcat | Oracle GlassFish Server | |
|---|---|---|
| Considered Both Products | Chose Apache Tomcat Tomcat is a more lightweight container in comparison to Oracle's Glassfish server. Glassfish however, became an enterprise product and can offer better after sales service. Independently Invited by TrustRadius A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info Chose Apache Tomcat GlassFish seemed to be fairly comparable in terms of easy of configuration and deployment, but we didn't do any side-by-side performance comparisons. Tomcat was better-known by the team, has more online forum support, and met the requirements of our project. Tomcat is fairly … Independently Invited by TrustRadius A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info | |
| Key User Insights | ||
| Would buy again | ||
No answers on this topic | No answers on this topic | |
| Delivers good value for the price | ||
No answers on this topic | No answers on this topic | |
| Happy with the feature set | ||
No answers on this topic | No answers on this topic | |
| Lived up to sales and marketing promises | ||
No answers on this topic | No answers on this topic | |
| Implementation went as expected | ||
No answers on this topic | No answers on this topic | |
| Apache Tomcat | Oracle GlassFish Server | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Application Servers |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Apache Tomcat | Oracle GlassFish Server | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend | 9.0 | 9.0 |
| Likelihood to Renew | 10.0 | - |
| Usability | 8.0 | - |
| Availability | 6.0 | - |
| Performance | 9.0 | - |
| Support Rating | 9.1 | - |
| Configurability | 8.0 | - |
| Ease of integration | 9.0 | - |
| Product Scalability | 9.0 | - |
