Apigee Edge vs. UiPath Integration Service

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Apigee Edge
Score 8.0 out of 10
N/A
Apigee Edge is an API management platform now owned and offered by Google, since Google acquired Apigee in 2016.N/A
UiPath Integration Service
Score 5.0 out of 10
N/A
UiPath Integration Service (including technology from Cloud Elements, following UiPath's acquisition of the company in 2021) is a cloud API integration service that uses cooperative apps to connect an organization’s customers, partners and employees to the cloud services they use. The vendor says that by using their pre-built elements, their one-to-many approach connects applications with services, each through a single API. The organization’s app can instantly share data with other applications…N/A
Pricing
Apigee EdgeUiPath Integration Service
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Apigee EdgeUiPath Integration Service
Free Trial
NoYes
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Apigee EdgeUiPath Integration Service
Considered Both Products
Apigee Edge
Chose Apigee Edge
Apigee is the best in the market in terms of API Analytics Apigee is having wonderful Documentation with short videos Security is a major concern and Apigee provides an easily configurable policy to secure API Quota and rate-limit is again very easy to configure on every API …
Chose Apigee Edge
Nothing really. This is the first time I've heard and use such technology. Its equivalent in a Spring Framework really is Netflix Zuul at best. But still Apigee Edge as a platform is still much easier to use and develop APIs from. Considering I could easily on-board developers …
Chose Apigee Edge
A Node server as a proxy that uses JSON Web Tokens would be more maintainable than Apigee.
Chose Apigee Edge
Amazon API's gateway does not have easy to set up policies and exception handling. It does not have a tracking mechanism. However, it is better to use AWS API's gateway if you have tight integration with AWS tools.
Chose Apigee Edge
Somewhere in the middle. Based on its current offerings and subscription model
UiPath Integration Service
Chose UiPath Integration Service
Cloud Elements was an established partner before I started working for the organization. I did not review alternatives.
Chose UiPath Integration Service
Multi-touch point integrations and developer friendly. More expensive but better features.
Chose UiPath Integration Service
Cloud Elements was the vendor that had the largest catalog of technologies to integrate with, had support during the sales and development process, and provided go-to-market assistance that others did not offer. We chose them because of their suite of services and offerings and …
Chose UiPath Integration Service
MuleSoft is also a similar product to Cloud Elements, but is not available as an option in this form. Workato and MuleSoft are competing cloud API connector platforms that perform a similar function to Cloud Elements. We chose Cloud Elements over them because CE provided a …
Chose UiPath Integration Service
At the time we found Cloud Elements we found no other option that had a Unified API for cloud storage providers.
Features
Apigee EdgeUiPath Integration Service
API Management
Comparison of API Management features of Product A and Product B
Apigee Edge
9.4
Ratings
12% above category average
UiPath Integration Service
-
Ratings
API access control9.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Rate limits and usage policies9.00 Ratings00 Ratings
API usage data9.00 Ratings00 Ratings
API user onboarding9.90 Ratings00 Ratings
API versioning9.90 Ratings00 Ratings
Usage billing and payments9.00 Ratings00 Ratings
API monitoring and logging9.90 Ratings00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Apigee EdgeUiPath Integration Service
Small Businesses
NGINX
NGINX
Score 9.2 out of 10
Make
Make
Score 8.9 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
NGINX
NGINX
Score 9.2 out of 10
IBM App Connect
IBM App Connect
Score 9.5 out of 10
Enterprises
NGINX
NGINX
Score 9.2 out of 10
IBM App Connect
IBM App Connect
Score 9.5 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Apigee EdgeUiPath Integration Service
Likelihood to Recommend
9.0
(0 ratings)
8.6
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
9.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Usability
9.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
6.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Apigee EdgeUiPath Integration Service
Likelihood to Recommend
Apigee has been great when managing the quota based access to the APIs. It is really good and suitable when considering proxying the in-house server endpoints access with the way it provides security with API Key validation and OAuth.
Read full review
Areas where it would be appropriate:
  1. If you want a really 'deep' integration with a third party software, and you want all the control over how it interacts with your software
  2. If you want a totally white-labeled solution, that is totally invisible to your customers.
  3. if you care more about a well thought out/useful API, rather than a pretty UI
Areas where it is less appropriate:
  1. If you want a Zapier-esque hands-off integration for YOU.
  2. if you want your customers to do more of the work, pay for it/etc.
  3. if you're a really small business, it could be too expensive. But it depends on your individual contract with them.
Read full review
Pros
  • Manage user access, we can allow specific access to users based on their need and even customize requests of services based on user requirements.
  • Allow branding, so that SFO can maintain its look and feel but still get the support and functionalities we need from Apigee.
  • Integrates well with other platforms we use.
Read full review
  • Customer Support -- They have a knowledgeable team and are very responsive.
  • Communication -- Most questions are addressed quickly
  • Documentation -- The API documentation is well organized and easy to follow.
Read full review
Cons
  • Might need to bring in more features that a gateway performs, such a orchestration to some extent.
  • May seem to be costly at start for small scale enterprises.
Read full review
  • There weren't really many cons to our experience. The only slight downside was the cost but they worked with us on that to make it work.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
I am not the one deciding whether to use apigee or not really. But personally, I would recommend the use of it as developing APIs on it is easy. And as a mediator between backend servers, we could easily modify request and responses in it without touching any backend code while having a centralize gateway to access our backend APIs too.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Usability
Support has helped us to resolved all the queries and community support was also good.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
Quite hard to get support, at least on the coding side, when we encounter blockers. But general concerns, they would schedule a call to you for them to get a whole picture of your concern. Albeit in my experience, bad really as they haven't replied about the progress, but otherwise seems to have been fixed.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
Apigee is the best in the market in terms of API Analytics Apigee is having wonderful Documentation with short videos Security is a major concern and Apigee provides an easily configurable policy to secure API Quota and rate-limit is again very easy to configure on every API basis It provides various policies to transform the response from one form to another form e.g. JSON to XML or XML to JSON
Read full review
MuleSoft is also a similar product to Cloud Elements, but is not available as an option in this form.

Workato and MuleSoft are competing cloud API connector platforms that perform a similar function to Cloud Elements. We chose Cloud Elements over them because CE provided a more robust path to unifying the behavior of connected systems.

Zapier is a workflow automation tool that I feel draws erroneous comparison to Cloud Elements that I need to highlight. Workflow automation tools (Zapier, IFTTT, Microsoft Flow) do provide multiple integrations, but for simplistic scenarios where only a handful of explicitly described steps need accomplished. Cloud Elements is a platform for developers to deliver faster and with higher reliability than making integrations one-by-one in complex systems that solve demanding problems.
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • Unruly, difficult to maintain, unable to test, difficult to troubleshoot and debug. Every ticket that requires Apigee work increases stress and anxiety.
Read full review
  • We are able to build integrations in HALF the time we could build them from scratch.
  • They allow our development team to spend more hours focused on developing our core product, not connections to other products.
  • Their large catalog of services to connect to allows us to spend much less time researching other platform integration endpoints and increases our R&D speed a considerable amount.
Read full review
ScreenShots