ApiZapi vs. LoadComplete

LoadComplete

Overview
Product	Rating	Most Used By	Product Summary	Starting Price
ApiZapi	Score 0.0 out of 10	N/A	In todays modern public cloud world, most companies are creating HTTP APIs that are used for their own as well as client integrations. The APIs not only need to function correctly, but they also need to have the necessary performance and scale so they don't get overloaded. ApiZapi is presented as an easy to use tool to set up the scenario based tests that can test and verify the API. ApiZapi is a cloud hosted service that allows the user to perform scenario based testing on your HTTP JSON…	N/A
LoadComplete	Score 7.8 out of 10	N/A	SmartBear LoadComplete is a performance, stress and load testing tool for web and Rich Internet Applications, including ASP.NET, Ajax, Flash/Flex and Silverlight.	$239 per month 100 virtual users

Pricing

ApiZapi

LoadComplete

Editions & Modules

No answers on this topic

Subscription Starter: $239
per month 100 virtual users
On-demand Starter: $287
one-time fee 100 virtual users
Subscription Pro: $699
per month 1000 virtual users
On-demand Pro: $887
one-time fee 1000 virtual users
Subscription Premium: $899
per month 2500 virtual users
On-demand Premium: $1,139
one-time fee 2500 virtual users
Enterprise: Let's chat

Offerings

Pricing Offerings
ApiZapi	LoadComplete
Free Trial
No	No
Free/Freemium Version
Yes	No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No	No

Entry-level Setup Fee

No setup fee

Additional Details

Usage based on per second usage. Cost based on consistent AWS serverless per second charges Following examples with 10 minute run, 6 minutes ramp up to total VUs: (12K VUs, 10 mins, 258K reqs, 430 RPS Avg for ~18 cents) (i.e. 18 times a day for a month for under $100) (100K VUs, 10 mins, 2.2mil reqs, 3.5k RPS Avg for ~60 cents)

On-demand plans contain a $4.99 monthly maintenance fee.

More Pricing Information

Community Pulse
	ApiZapi	LoadComplete
Considered Both Products	ApiZapi No answer on this topic	LoadComplete Kate Woodward Marketing Project Manager Chose LoadComplete It is one of the best platforms. LoadComplete is all over a jack of many traits. It provides us a detailed report to our system analytics as well as developers. Moreover, there is also a smart built-in data correlation in LoadComplete which helps to correlate different … Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose LoadComplete We chose loadcomplete because we already use SmartBear software for other automation solutions. Porting over test cases is easy and a user can have a test up and running within minutes. I do wish SmartBear would have better support and I haven't used any other testing tool in a … Incentivized Helpful? Yury Vakhatov Test Automation Engineer Chose LoadComplete JMeter is a more flexible tool because it gives the possibility to write scripts. Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose LoadComplete JMeter being an open-source tool has the advantage of no cost to purchase the tool. Of course, to work in JMeter, the tester needs extensive knowledge on the tool to create a framework but LoadComplete has the advantage there as it is easy to start with and does well if the … Incentivized Helpful?

Features

ApiZapi

LoadComplete

Load Testing

Comparison of Load Testing features of Product A and Product B
	ApiZapi - Ratings	LoadComplete 8.2 Ratings 3% below category average
End to end performance management	00 Ratings	8.40 Ratings
Integrated performance data	00 Ratings	9.50 Ratings
Deployment model flexibility	00 Ratings	6.90 Ratings
Real time monitoring	00 Ratings	8.00 Ratings
Automated anomaly detection	00 Ratings	8.40 Ratings

Best Alternatives
	ApiZapi	LoadComplete
Small Businesses	No answers on this topic	No answers on this topic
Medium-sized Companies	ReadyAPI Score 7.0 out of 10	ReadyAPI Score 7.0 out of 10
Enterprises	ReadyAPI Score 7.0 out of 10	ReadyAPI Score 7.0 out of 10
All Alternatives	View all alternatives	View all alternatives

User Ratings
	ApiZapi	LoadComplete
Likelihood to Recommend	- (0 ratings)	8.0 (0 ratings)
Usability	- (0 ratings)	9.0 (0 ratings)
Support Rating	- (0 ratings)	8.0 (0 ratings)

User Testimonials
	ApiZapi	LoadComplete
Likelihood to Recommend	No answers on this topic	If we already use TestComplete for test automation and there is an urgent need to perform load testing, then it is easy to start with LoadComplete but the tool itself has to improve a lot and support customization to suit our needs. I would say if load testing is the main criteria to use this tool, then there are other open-source tools like JMeter that can support better than this. Of course, as it is an enterprise tool it has very good reporting and record and playback options that I see as an advantage for basic users. Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review
Pros	No answers on this topic	Smart built-in data correlation. Automatically helps to correlate different dynamic parameters like user session ids, authorization tokens, db-identifiers and so on. Works very fast and save your time for test development. Record & Play feature - LoadComplete can record application servers' metrics like CPU and memory usage. Incentivized Yury Vakhatov Test Automation Engineer Read full review
Cons	No answers on this topic	Some of the cons of LoadComplete are that it gets slow when the size of the test increases. Also, the coding is not possible with LoadComplete. Moreover, it needs to support flexibility for a framework that can be customized based on the needs. Also, some graphs remain empty which is confusing for me as a user and I would like a description of why a certain graph cannot gather data. Incentivized Kate Woodward Marketing Project Manager Read full review
Usability	No answers on this topic	Usability is really good because being an enterprise tool that might be an easy option to convince users to try this tool. It has a lot of easy-to-use, cool options. Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review
Support Rating	No answers on this topic	Customer support is good. If any concerns are raised, they are usually resolved soon, but when questioned about a feature LoadComplete does not support, it usually takes more time to resolve. Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review
Alternatives Considered	No answers on this topic	It is one of the best platforms. LoadComplete is all over a jack of many traits. It provides us a detailed report to our system analytics as well as developers. Moreover, there is also a smart built-in data correlation in LoadComplete which helps to correlate different parameters like user session IDs, authorization tokens, and so on. Other than that, LoadComplete also has the ability to run tests in the cloud. Incentivized Kate Woodward Marketing Project Manager Read full review
Return on Investment	No answers on this topic	Negative: Licensing fees are too expensive. Positive: Able to generate and present reports, Able to show developers where bottleneck shows up. Positive: Easy to understand software to train new users. Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review
ScreenShots	ApiZapi Screenshots