Apollo is a $1.6B AI-powered sales platform that helps revenue teams find and engage leads, automate outreach, manage deals, and enrich data. Boasting B2B database of more than 210 million contacts and 35 million companies, Apollo’s end-to-end platform helps businesses of all sizes unlock their full market potential with precision and ease.
With users among 500,000+ companies, including Autodesk, Cyera, and DocuSign, Apollo offers a go-to-market platform to…
$59
per month per user
Zoom Revenue Accelerator
Score 8.9 out of 10
N/A
Zoom Revenue Accelerator , the evolution of Zoom IQ, is a conversation intelligence tool, available for users of Zoom Meetings.
N/A
Pricing
Apollo.io
Zoom Revenue Accelerator
Editions & Modules
Basic
$59
per month per user
Professional
$99
per month per user
Organization
$1,188
per year per user
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Apollo.io
Zoom Revenue Accelerator
Free Trial
Yes
No
Free/Freemium Version
Yes
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No
No
Entry-level Setup Fee
Optional
No setup fee
Additional Details
20% discount for annual billing on the Basic and Professional plans.
Apollo.io has all features of prospecting, outreach automation including email sequences, campaign tracking, lead scoring, and analytics in one interface which enables sales persons to manage their entire sales funnel without having any other extra tool. Another benefit is for …
In Outreach, when a Sequence ends, a pop-up automatically appears prompting you to add the person to the next Sequence. Apollo.io doesn’t have this feature. Outreach also allows you to run Sequences directly from the Extension, and the workflow is person-centric. For example, …
In terms of everything Apollo.io was very user friendly and was more accurate. The data received was on point and we did get more contact and email data from Apollo.io rather than Linkedin. The value for money was way better than the platforms we tried.
So we have evaluated Seamless AI, Enrich AI, and Snov.io before finally deciding to settle for Apollo. These platforms have better UI and some, like Snov, have good email sending capability, but they all lag when it comes to their database; they do not match up to Apollo. …
Apollo is my favorite in terms of the quality for emails and phone . and i have been using so many other tools which unable to gave me that kind of data.
The main other product I've used is Hubspot but I used that as more of a CRM and where I wasn't focused on prospecting, generating leads, sequences, etc with it even though I know that is a possibility. So I can't necessarily compare the two given I used them for separate tasks
Apollo.io has a mid tier dialer that I was looking to replace. Ultimately, I never replaced Apollo.io's dialer because it was really nice to just have one single tool that everything worked through, and never had to transfer data or call logs between platforms.
Apollo.io stacks up against other interfaces because of its overall all in one prospecting tool capabilities right from account identification to end to end reachout to leads no other prospecting tool provides such wide range of features for a bd reachout. It's a …
Apollo.io is much faster in gathering data that I'm searching for and it's pretty simple to control. I can also save searches, lists, and export the data at whichever capacity I desire. Also, I like the new features that involve AI, Buying Intent, and LinkedIn data scraping. …
Zoom fit into our workflow better than the rest. While all the other tools certainly worked well, and could do the job, we felt the most comfortable with Zoom. In particular the ease of use. Specifically, at the time we were assessing the tools Aircall was a product we had used …
Salesforce Sales AI auto updates records in SF. Provides predictions, trends & insights into deals. Generative call summaries, key take-aways, prospecting low code & fully integrated in SF. We chose Zoom Revenue Accelerator because is complemented our requirement of Zoom …
Zoom Revenue Accelerator gives us better automatic metrics than Gong, better conversational parsing, and very valuable follow up data. We went with Revenue Accelerator so we could get those benefits and also simplify our tech stack by vertically integrating video calls with …
I mainly went with Zoom Revenue Accelerator because I wanted it to work very well, as natively as possible, with the Zoom ecosystem we have at my company.
We use Zoom for our meetings, and in some teams we also use Zoom Phone, which also works quite well with Zoom Revenue …
For sales management, Gong has greater more useful tools and an easier user interface making it easier specially for managers to organize coaching and feedback calls per rep. Chorus.ai does mainly the same but lags behind Gong on user experience so I won´t put this as a pro …
I use Zoom IQ as the first software of this type provided for free by my University. Although other similar software (Webex) is also used at my University, I have never used it. So I do not know what to say about it. My other colleagues at the University also do not use similar …
Gong is another great tool and primarily focused on conversion. Zoom IQ is kind of add on over your Zoom but Gong is only conversion focused so little edge over that. But zooms accuracy we found to be better in certain cases when compared to gong. Zoom is more easier to use as …
Zoom IQ is the easiest interface in my opinion and it also integrates with zoom which most companies already use on a regular basis. The price point is the same to its competition. For us it was a no brainer.
They have a wide variety of services that they are willing to negotiate and bundle into the deal. They are easy to work with and have a seamless way to integrate with our system.
Chorus.AI is very similar to Zoom IQ. I think the sales team should invest in either product. I was not involved in the purchasing process so I am not sure why one company was chosen over the other for us to work with.
Zoom IQ is much better than most of its competitors. As I've said Zoom helped us a lot in our business so that is the reason why the company has chosen Zoom IQ. It is relatively much cheaper than most of its competitors as well. Easy to use (slightly) and user friendly.
We already use zoom as our virtual meeting platform and the integrations this tool has with our existing tech stack were seamless. That was the major reason for us to select Zoom IQ over Level AI.
The features these sales enablement tools provide are pretty much the same in the aspect of usability and functionality. The advantage Zoom IQ gets over others is easy of integrating it with the default communication and collaboration tool from Zoom. Keeping things connected …
Gong had to many features that would have done unused, Zoom IQ was a way to start out and get things going and making sure there was a for for sales IQ in the sales department before going all in
I would say that Webex is almost similar to Zoom in regards to the enhancements and usage. The UI of Webex is a bit simpler. Whereas the zoom UI has a lot of information and a first-time user might need some time to get used to it. Zoom is way very inferior to GoToMeeting …
The automatic email feature is extremely helpful for quickly contacting more potential clients. It is user-friendly and easy to access all buttons, which helps you navigate the task efficiently. It could greatly help to acquire more clients for a project to be successful. I cannot see anything less appropriate for me to achieve the goal I am aiming for.
Training on key features is difficult, so adoption of the platform is not where we would like it to be after 6 months of being deployed. Our team works primarily within Salesforce, so it would be helpful to have additional focus on adding ZRA components to the Salesforce managed package. Would love to see on overall customer summary for example. Rather than having to go to each conversation to get details of the customer journey. The price point for ZRA is quite high compared to meetings & phone so I would like to see continuous growth/new features being released to justify the spend. With ZRA, the sales leaders can share tactics and use cases on how they utilize ZRA to manage their individual teams. The analytics easily shows team members who are exceeding or who may need additional support based on (overall customer sentiment & engagement).
Apollo.io has an amazing amount of features. It's great being able to complete so many tasks in one space but it's also overwhelming. It took me a few days to work through all of the options when searching for a company or person. After a few days it started to provide companies for me which was confusing before I understood what was happening. At first, I was also confused about what a "sequence" was so maybe some of the jargon can be confusing. I think with time I will become more comfortable once I understand all of the options offered.
Once you're through the setup it couldn't be easier. For our client facing team members it was very much an experience of. Today you're using "App A" and tomorrow log into Zoom and you're all setup. Zoom Revenue Accelerator is effortless for an end user to pick up and start using. But the setup is where you need help to understand. Various things with where recordings are stored, how calls are routed, and even who can access what phone numbers and recordings can be challenging to setup without help. And a number of docs aren't as up to date as they could be, given the Zoom UI can change so rapidly. Once they solve the sprawling admin side of the product, it'll be a 10 out of 10.
The team wants to solve probelms, but we are finding that they don't know how to solve the more technical issues quickly. I suspect that they don't have a mature process for escalations, and they don't have a usable knowledge base article repository. They seems to push emails around to let us know that people are working on the issues to find solutions, but this takes weeks and oftentimes still leaves us without a resolution.
Apollo.io has all features of prospecting, outreach automation including email sequences, campaign tracking, lead scoring, and analytics in one interface which enables sales persons to manage their entire sales funnel without having any other extra tool. Another benefit is for pricing related which has been understand from our management team.
Zoom fit into our workflow better than the rest. While all the other tools certainly worked well, and could do the job, we felt the most comfortable with Zoom. In particular the ease of use. Specifically, at the time we were assessing the tools Aircall was a product we had used for a number of years, but call quality was not something that came often. And we'd have as many as 35% of calls drop due to connection issues. (Not an issue with Zoom, call quality is >98%). Dialpad was also one we extensively tested and trialed. It felt far better suited to a team larger then us, and one with a broader Support function then our initial use case. The Salesforce offering just felt the most expensive for the least value. While it would work probably the best with our CRM, it was clunky to operate from an end user POV.
Increased # of booked meetings from outbound email outreach.
Our sales team's productivity has improved when prospecting/doing outreach (which has a monetary value, given our salaried status). This makes us more productive, enabling us to accomplish more and reach a greater number of people in a day.
We've only recently implemented this, so we're still waiting to close, but leads are on their way to doing so.