App Builder by Infragistics vs. Budibase

• Well suited for new and greenfield projects.
• Great for projects using Material Design concepts
• Great when you have dedicated design team with the right tools to work with ID
• Not so good, if your design system or tool does not support ID

Even though its a solid tool I think for now it is best suited to create some relatively complex apps but not best suited to build very complex apps where you need to manipulate data during runtime. But they are actively developing the produt and push updates on the regular basis which makes me feel optimistic about their future.

Incentivized

• WYSIWYG editor
• Code generation with Angular
• Theme and styles

Incentivized

• Can connect REST APIs
• Can define User Roles
• Open Source so you can host it yourself if you prefer
• They have a component called reapeater field which is extreamly useful in cases you want to iterate UI component on you table

Incentivized

• Not a viable product yet until the Blazor implementation is entirely completed.
• More components/controls needed in the toolbox.

Incentivized

• Building UI even though simple, it gets tougher when you want to build a complex one. The way they have implemented data sources in the UI is bit rigid.
• you can not use JS in all the components to manipulate data which makes it less dynamic compared to say AppSmith.

Incentivized

When comparing App Builder against PowerApps, the feature set isn't even close. PowerApps is slow and only works in the corporate enterprise whereas App Builder allows for deployments in a full-scale environment. The only thing similar, is that both PowerApps and App Builder are low code.

Incentivized

Incentivized

• I can't evaluate this.

Incentivized

• made building internal tool easy
• saved good number of man hours compared to building tools from scratch

Incentivized