Appgain vs. Piano Analytics

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Appgain
Score 0.0 out of 10
N/A
N/A
$99
per month
Piano Analytics
Score 8.0 out of 10
Mid-Size Companies (51-1,000 employees)
Piano Analytics, formerly AT Internet, provides digital analytics to help customers measure their audience, optimise their digital performance and create value. From data collection to exploration, activation, and the sharing of actionable insights, the Piano Analytics Suite is designed to provide reliable high-quality data to enhance decision-making company-wide. Adapted to e-commerce, media, finance/banking, and corporate websites & mobile apps, the vendor promises an easy-to-use solution…
$430
per server calls consumption
Pricing
AppgainPiano Analytics
Editions & Modules
Basic
$99
per month
Business
$430
per server calls consumption
Premium
Contact us
per server calls consumption
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
AppgainPiano Analytics
Free Trial
YesYes
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup fee$430 per server calls consumption
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
AppgainPiano Analytics
Considered Both Products
Appgain

No answer on this topic

Piano Analytics
Chose Piano Analytics
Amplitude Analytics, Google Analytics, and Mixpanel [are] tools I use[d] at the company I worked for [before].
Chose Piano Analytics
I was not involved in [the] choosing AT Internet.
Chose Piano Analytics
[AT Internet is] much easier to understand, has many options, and is a very thorough platform in general.
Chose Piano Analytics
AT Internet is more comprehensive and provides a lot of filters in easy ways, especially for websites that has various subdomains and pages used for different purposes. Also, the trend analysis and the ability to create reports and design them the way we want is very, very …
Chose Piano Analytics
I use AT Internet and Google Analytics together so I didn't have to choose between the two tools. In fact, it's a choice that is made at the group level.
We have historically used both tools for different needs. AT Internet was chosen in particular for its respect for privacy …
Chose Piano Analytics
AT Internet is much more flexible than other solutions we used. The reliability of their platform and the quality of the data is better.
Chose Piano Analytics
I have not tested any other product of this type, AT Internet was chosen by the company because it excels in its field and seems to be among the best in its class
Chose Piano Analytics
To be very honest, it was a decision made before I joined the company. I think that if I had the choice, I would prefer to use Google Analytics from a media perspective. However, it is also a question of budget as Google Analytics Premium is more expensive.
Chose Piano Analytics
We prefer AT because it's a european company, transparent about GDPR concerns, with great customer support.
Chose Piano Analytics
More complete and detailed. And we are used to it, so moving won't make any sense. You don't change a team that is winning.
Chose Piano Analytics
According to Gartner, AT Internet is one of the best web analytics solutions on the market. Adding to this, we wanted to make sure that we get a secure solution in terms of legal issues. Furthermore, when considering the pricing of AT Internet, this solution is quite …
Chose Piano Analytics
For our department we prefer to use AT Internet because we have been trained and we know the tool well. However when we create new ephemeral mini sites (which is quite rare) we may have to use Google Analytics because the solution seems simpler and faster to integrate for our …
Chose Piano Analytics
AT Internet has many advantages over both such as fully processed real-time data availability (vs. comScore/ Adobe), video and audio analytics (vs. Google) and enhanced support.
Chose Piano Analytics
I think it's everything that I wrote in previous answers combined together.
Chose Piano Analytics
AT Internet is as easy to use as GA, if not more. AT Internet has a much higher respect for user data privacy than Google does and won't use it for advertising. Data stays in Europe which, given how the US has little respect for user privacy and given how unpredictable their …
Chose Piano Analytics
The brands we work with use exclusively Mediametrie Net Rating to check the audience of the publisher's websites. Knowing AT Internet is a partner is very important for us and shows the quality of AT Internet product.
Google Analytics, even if it's used by a lot of publishers, …
Chose Piano Analytics
Actually, AT internet did not stack up against other solutions. AT Internet is very expensive comparing other solutions. There are many open-sources and free tools in the market like Matomo. So we stopped to use AT Internet.
Chose Piano Analytics
AT Internet is more comprehensive than Google Analytics. It allows you to make personalized requests, to access the API easily with high quotas. Other tools accompany the analytics solution and are included in the license. Data are also stored and processed in European Union …
Chose Piano Analytics
This was not our choice but the customer's.
Chose Piano Analytics
Easier and quicker to use than Comscore.
Best Alternatives
AppgainPiano Analytics
Small Businesses
Agency Analytics
Agency Analytics
Score 9.9 out of 10
StatCounter
StatCounter
Score 9.0 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Supermetrics
Supermetrics
Score 10.0 out of 10
Siteimprove
Siteimprove
Score 10.0 out of 10
Enterprises
Alteryx Platform
Alteryx Platform
Score 8.9 out of 10
Quantum Metric
Quantum Metric
Score 8.0 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
AppgainPiano Analytics
Likelihood to Recommend
-
(0 ratings)
8.0
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
-
(0 ratings)
8.0
(0 ratings)
Usability
-
(0 ratings)
8.3
(0 ratings)
Availability
-
(0 ratings)
9.5
(0 ratings)
Performance
-
(0 ratings)
9.0
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
-
(0 ratings)
9.0
(0 ratings)
In-Person Training
-
(0 ratings)
5.0
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
-
(0 ratings)
8.0
(0 ratings)
Configurability
-
(0 ratings)
9.0
(0 ratings)
Product Scalability
-
(0 ratings)
8.0
(0 ratings)
Vendor post-sale
-
(0 ratings)
6.0
(0 ratings)
Vendor pre-sale
-
(0 ratings)
8.0
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
AppgainPiano Analytics
Likelihood to Recommend
No answers on this topic
When it comes to web analytics AT Internet is well suited. We introduced AT Internet in 2017 after an evaluation project with other professional analytics solutions. Starting with our corporate website we quickly rolled it out to our customer experience platform, our webshops, and our corporate intranet based on SharePoint 2013. Especially the use in our intranet brought significant improvements over the standard analytics features SP 2013 is offering. The ATI tag systems with their flexibility allow us to include company-specific properties and thus making it possible for us to analyze our intranet usage on segments such as locations, branches, and so on.
Read full review
Pros
No answers on this topic
  • It assists with following the conduct of clients when we make item developments.
  • AT Internet is utilized to break down the conduct of workers on another web and Android application project.
  • It is an investigation device, that empowers us to see client ventures, screen advanced KPIs, and once again use the information for promoting purposes.
Read full review
Cons
No answers on this topic
  • Not so easy to make difference between users who are inside the company and those who come from other entities.
  • Some concept such as "taux de rebond" are not so easily explained.
  • Not so easy to rename the name of the pages consulted. For instance, if I have tagged a page as "Landing Page" but afterward I feel the name as misleading, I must ask my IT to change the name (ie "Home Page") but can't do it myself.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
No answers on this topic
I gave this rating because I think that AT Internet is a good tool, user-friendly easy for onboarding and simple dashboards, however the majority of people use Google Analytics, especially media agency, it is easier for them to use Google Analytics.
Read full review
Usability
No answers on this topic
Overall the experience is very good, it's quick, relaiable and does everything I would want. The only problems I have are matching the correct stats to what I want. It can be painful trying to find the right thing and the explanations are not always the clearest. That's the only issue i've found though.
Read full review
Reliability and Availability
No answers on this topic
I don't have any exemple in mind where AT Internet interface hasn't been available, i have always been able to use AT Internet when i needed it. The only issues to notice is that it happens sometimes that real time or D-1 datas are partially delayed.
Read full review
Performance
No answers on this topic
All excel reports are downloaded very quickly, even if the query is more than 20 000 lines.
Read full review
Support Rating
No answers on this topic
I have not used the Support Team thereby I am unable to review how their Support Teams works. However, in an instance where I had an issue, my concerned department contacted their support team and I was provided with the solution of the problem I was facing within a short span of time.
Read full review
In-Person Training
No answers on this topic
The in-person training unfortunately does not match to our expectations, was too much focus on digital basis and not on AT Internet functionnalties and how to use it. We paid for one day and only 15 minutes at the end was focused on our real needs in terms of media analytics.
Read full review
Online Training
No answers on this topic
No online training
Read full review
Implementation Rating
No answers on this topic
The support team helps us to implement AT Internet.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
No answers on this topic
AT Internet suited our business needs at the best value. Adobe Analytics wasn't user friendly for non-technical employees, Google Analytics (free and premium) provided significant limitations in reporting and customization, and IBM Digital Analytics had limitations on the amount of API calls and dashboard reports you can create. Webtrends was very interesting, but we felt it was a lot of design without the same amount of value. None of these tools produced real-time data that could be reported on right away, some tools had data that you could view real-time but it wasn't in reports until 30 minutes later, or the closest thing to real-time was a 30-minute delay. AT Internet had a 4-minute delay which was crucial to our business needs. AT Internet also had the best recommendations for support, without a monthly service hour requirement, and with very responsive account managers.
Read full review
Scalability
No answers on this topic
Regarding AT Internet possibilities, it could be adapted to small or large organizations, easy to set up. We can add sites in makets that we launch e-commerce.
Read full review
Return on Investment
No answers on this topic
  • Editors are able to take far more rapid decisions. This has helped drive continuous double-digit growth in RTÉ online consumption.
  • It is enabling big data analytics projects which can benefit curation and service enhancement.
  • Key business user tools are easy to use, aiding productivity.
Read full review
ScreenShots

Piano Analytics Screenshots

Screenshot of Analytics Suite Delta - ExplorerScreenshot of Analytics Suite Delta - Traffic SourcesScreenshot of Analytics Suite Delta - AttributionScreenshot of Analytics Suite Delta - AXON PredictionsScreenshot of Analytics Suite Delta - NavigationScreenshot of Analytics Suite Delta - Navigation