| Product | Rating | Most Used By | Product Summary | Starting Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
 Appian | Score7.6 out of 10 | N/A | Appian is a low-code development and business process management platform. It features drag-and-drop design for app building, automated work processes, unified data management, and cloud-based deployment. | $0 |
 OutSystems | Score7.3 out of 10 | N/A | The OutSystems Platform is a Platform-as-a-Service solution for rapid delivery of responsive web and mobile applications. It includes functionalities required to develop, deploy, manage and change web and mobile applications. It is targeted at the delivery of enterprise applications that require integration with backend systems, complex business rules and logic, usable interfaces and flexibility to change. It can be deployed in the cloud, on-premises or in hybrid environments. | $4,000 per month |
| Appian | OutSystems | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Editions & Modules |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Offerings |
| |||||||||||||||
| Entry-level Setup Fee | No setup fee | No setup fee | ||||||||||||||
| Additional Details | — | — | ||||||||||||||
| More Pricing Information | ||||||||||||||||
| Appian | OutSystems | |
|---|---|---|
| Considered Both Products | Chose Appian Appian is more suitable for us because is easier to build than OutSystems. Invited by the Vendor A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. TR verified that a representative sample of customers was invited. More Info Chose Appian Appian presented us that the software will allow EDPR to develop better solutions than OutSystems because our developments need to be very closed to the business needs, and we are in a really changing work environment, then we need to be able to adapt our development as fast as … Invited by the Vendor A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. TR verified that a representative sample of customers was invited. More Info | |
| Key User Insights | ||
| Would buy again | ||
No answers on this topic | No answers on this topic | |
| Delivers good value for the price | ||
No answers on this topic | No answers on this topic | |
| Happy with the feature set | ||
No answers on this topic | No answers on this topic | |
| Lived up to sales and marketing promises | ||
No answers on this topic | No answers on this topic | |
| Implementation went as expected | ||
No answers on this topic | No answers on this topic | |
| Appian | OutSystems | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Low-Code Development |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Appian | OutSystems | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend | 9.4 | 7.0 |
| Likelihood to Renew | 8.5 | 8.2 |
| Usability | 8.7 | 8.0 |
| Support Rating | 8.4 | 7.5 |
| In-Person Training | 9.0 | 9.1 |
| Online Training | 6.0 | 8.2 |
| Implementation Rating | 1.0 | 7.3 |
