Aqua Cloud Native Security Platform vs. Snyk

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Aqua Cloud Native Security Platform
Score 6.2 out of 10
N/A
The Aqua Platform is an integrated Cloud Native Application Protection Platform (CNAPP), that prioritizes risk and automates prevention while also focussing on detection and response across the lifecycle. It aims to stop current and prevent future cloud native attacks.
$10,188
per year
Snyk
Score 8.1 out of 10
N/A
Snyk’s Developer Security Platform automatically integrates with a developer’s workflow and helps security teams to collaborate with their development teams. It boasts a developer-first approach that ensures organizations can secure all of the critical components of their applications from code to cloud, driving developer productivity, revenue growth, customer satisfaction, cost savings and an improved security posture. The vendor states Snyk is used by 1,200 customers worldwide today, including…
$0
Pricing
Aqua Cloud Native Security PlatformSnyk
Editions & Modules
Team
$10,188
per year
Advanced
$25,188
per year
Enterprise
Tiered Pricing
Free
$0
Team (Snyk Open Source or Snyk Container or Snyk Infrastructure as Code)
$23
per month per user
Business (Snyk Open Source or Snyk Container or Snyk Infrastructure as Code)
$42
per month per user
Team (Snyk Open Source + Snyk Container + Snyk Code + Snyk Infrastructure as Code)
$98
per month per user
Business (Snyk Open Source + Snyk Container + Snyk Code + Snyk Infrastructure as Code)
$178
per month per user
Enterprise
Contact Sales
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Aqua Cloud Native Security PlatformSnyk
Free Trial
NoYes
Free/Freemium Version
YesYes
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional DetailsPricing is dependent on the number of developers selected, the number of products selected, and the payment term selected. Please visit the Snyk plans page for an interactive pricing calculator.
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Aqua Cloud Native Security PlatformSnyk
Best Alternatives
Aqua Cloud Native Security PlatformSnyk
Small Businesses

No answers on this topic

No answers on this topic

Medium-sized Companies
CrowdStrike Falcon
CrowdStrike Falcon
Score 9.1 out of 10
Veracode
Veracode
Score 8.7 out of 10
Enterprises
CrowdStrike Falcon
CrowdStrike Falcon
Score 9.1 out of 10
Veracode
Veracode
Score 8.7 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Aqua Cloud Native Security PlatformSnyk
Likelihood to Recommend
6.6
(2 ratings)
8.0
(4 ratings)
Usability
6.4
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Aqua Cloud Native Security PlatformSnyk
Likelihood to Recommend
Aqua Security
Excellent tool for identifying Cloud security issues such as vulnerabilities or misconfigurations. The complaince scanning ability is perfect for enterprise organization to maintain complaince based off various complaince programs.
Read full review
Snyk
Scenarios Where Snyk Is Well-Suited CI/CD Pipeline Integration (Node.js, Python, etc.) Container Security Open Source License Compliance Infrastructure as Code (IaC) SecurityScenarios Where Snyk May Be Less Appropriate Scanning Proprietary or Custom Code for Unknown Vulnerabilities Complex Monorepos with Custom Build Tools Organizations Requiring Custom Security Rules Advanced Security Teams Needing Correlation and Deep Triage.
Read full review
Pros
Aqua Security
  • seamless integration with GitHub, Jfrog, etc
  • Easy configuration of security policy
  • detailed instructions regarding finding of Vulnerabilities
Read full review
Snyk
  • Helps in dependency management
  • SAST - Static Application Security Testing
  • Infra Code Scan ( Terraform , Cloud Formation , Docker image scan)
  • OSSG
Read full review
Cons
Aqua Security
  • The UI/UX of the Aqua platform has several issues, especially with the sign up/in flow, authentication, alerts and display of results
  • Missing a few prominent notification channels for alerts such as Datadog, Webhooks
  • Lacks complete granularity in RBAC with the ability to set permissions based on the cloud
  • Some parts of the cocumentation for connecting an Oracle Cloud account is not up to update or clear
Read full review
Snyk
  • The tool itself has many capabilities but using them operationally within the platform on a day to day basis for managing vulnerabilities is not a good experience.
  • Our company was in desparate need of a tool to help us manage vulnerabilities so we could achieve a SOC 2 assurance report without findings.
Read full review
Usability
Aqua Security
The UI and UX of the platform requires some work since the platform is not for all screen sizes and the experience with certain features such as authentication and creating alerts is not great. The session times out while performing an action and having to repeat the entire action once again, which is not a great experience. Adding notification channels while creating the alerts is not seamless. But the platform has good UX with some great documentation for integrations along with the ability to customise dashboards.
Read full review
Snyk
Developer-Centric Design - Snyk integrates directly into IDEs (like VS Code and IntelliJ), CI/CD pipelines, GitHub/GitLab, and container registries. Clear, Actionable Vulnerability report issues are categorized by severity.


Reports include fix recommendations, pull request suggestions, and links to remediation advice.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Aqua Security
Aqua Cloud Native Security Platform is easy to implement and manage compare the Dome9.
Read full review
Snyk
Unfortunately, neither cover all of the use cases that we would like so we need to use both but they are both excellent tools as part of our vulnerability management. We find that Snyk helps us better with improving our MTTR of identified vulnerabilities when compared to inspector but that may be more based on how we have implemented both tools
Read full review
Return on Investment
Aqua Security
  • ROI is high with our Aqua project.
Read full review
Snyk
  • Increased developer experience
  • Better productivity due to shift left as Vulnerabilities are caught earlier in the SDLC process
  • Improved Vulnerability Management
  • Common dashboard for various stages in CI/CD
Read full review
ScreenShots