Arctera Backup Exec vs. Percona Backup for MongoDB

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Arctera Backup Exec
Score 6.8 out of 10
N/A
Arctera Backup Exec is a backup and disaster recovery solution. It works in virtual, physical, and multi-cloud environments and integrates with several third-party software releases and applications.N/A
Percona Backup for MongoDB
Score 9.2 out of 10
N/A
Percona Backup for MongoDB is a distributed, low-impact solution for achieving consistent backups of MongoDB sharded clusters and replica sets. Percona Backup for MongoDB is an alternative for users who want a fully supported community backup tool, but do not want to pay for MongoDB Enterprise and Ops Manager. With its command-line interface, users can perform consistent backup/restore of clusters and non-sharded replica sets, and improve cluster backup consistency.…N/A
Pricing
Arctera Backup ExecPercona Backup for MongoDB
Editions & Modules
Veritas Backup Exec
Contact sales team
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Arctera Backup ExecPercona Backup for MongoDB
Free Trial
YesYes
Free/Freemium Version
NoYes
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeOptional
Additional DetailsFree and open-source
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Arctera Backup ExecPercona Backup for MongoDB
Considered Both Products
Arctera Backup Exec
Chose Arctera Backup Exec
The user interface is accurate, and you have the information you need on the screen.
Chose Arctera Backup Exec
I chose Veritas Backup Exec for my clients Windows Servers about 15 to 20 years ago because that was the ONLY backup software available at the time.
Since then, [I feel] the software has gotten bloated, unreliable and cluttered.
Veeam Backup & Replication is much more …
Chose Arctera Backup Exec
Veritas Backup Exec is very comparable to Unitrends and in some areas is easier to use. The license side of Veritas Backup Exec is much more difficult to manage compared to Unitrends. Unitrends seems to be a much smoother solutions to protect virtual environments. Restoring …
Chose Arctera Backup Exec
We moved away from Unitrends for one reason only. Pricing. Unitrends continued to raise their pricing and renewal fees where we were no longer able to afford it. Veritas Backup Exec provided the functionality needed at the best price point for us.
Chose Arctera Backup Exec
Backup Exec was the cheapest out of all the other options we were looking at.

Chose Arctera Backup Exec
We did look at several backup solutions when we implemented VMWare. I might be a little prejudiced because I've used the product so long, but there are many competitors in this market, and the cost was much higher to obtain the same functionality as we get with Veritas Backup …
Chose Arctera Backup Exec
Both Veritas Backup Exec and Acronis Backup provide reliable backup and recovery solutions, however Vertias Backup Exec is much more scaleable, and better suited for larger business environments.
Chose Arctera Backup Exec
Essentially we chose Backup Exec because we were familiar with it's config and interface. Both Acronis and Arcserve provided the same or similar features, but came in at a higher price. We also looked at hosted backup services and found them extremely expensive. We adopted …
Chose Arctera Backup Exec
If your company is looking at changing solutions or currently does not have any, Veritas Backup Exec is the way to go. Do yourself a favor and try the 60 day trial, you won't be disappointed! Very simple to use and has a great GUI, much better than what the competition has to …
Chose Arctera Backup Exec
Our version of Backup Exec lacked the appropriate VM support, although I believe that such support is better in 15 and 16 versions. We currently use a combination of Backup Exec and Acronis - our parent company uses Veeam.
Chose Arctera Backup Exec
Veeam is a vastly superior product. We use Veritas Backup Exec because we have legacy software and equipment that Veeam cannot fully integrate with yet.
Chose Arctera Backup Exec
Backup Exec (when it was still under the Symantec umbrella) used to offer a backup appliance for local-cloud backup. It was expensive. I don't think they offer it anymore. In any case we wanted to engage such a solution and have been using Barracuda Backup for several years. It …
Chose Arctera Backup Exec
Symantec and Acronis are well matched, but Symantec is more flexible in designing jobs. Acronis creates images that are mountable whereas Symantec creates backup files that can be restored quickly and easily. Barracuda and Datto are "total data storage" backup options and …
Chose Arctera Backup Exec
There are different alternatives like Iperius, Handy Backup or similar but for what is my experience , I have always been comfortable with this software and even the company that used it has never had the need to look for other software, for this reason has never been a …
Chose Arctera Backup Exec
Veeam is by far superior to Backup Exec in the virtual, SQL, AD, Exchange, and Physical Environments. The way they interact with the Virtual Servers is more streamlined and generates better results. They also support more file system such as AIX and XFS for backup and …
Chose Arctera Backup Exec
SBE is much better for onsite backups as Carbonite is Cloud based and if you have no network connection to your server there is no way to get files backed up or back online. This is why we went with SBE to handle our tape backups on a daily bases and keep server backed with a …
Chose Arctera Backup Exec
Sorry but Veeam stacks up against Backup Exec. Backup Exec has a million of options, Veeam is clean and more easy to configure and use. Right now I can't recommend Backup Exec, but I hope in the next years I can come back and say something positive.
Chose Arctera Backup Exec
The engagement process was the best in the industry and the product was easy to explain and sell.
Chose Arctera Backup Exec
Symantec does have a leg up on the competitors if cost isn't a factor for a customer. However, even Symantec's price point is pretty compatible.
Percona Backup for MongoDB

No answer on this topic

Features
Arctera Backup ExecPercona Backup for MongoDB
Data Center Backup
Comparison of Data Center Backup features of Product A and Product B
Arctera Backup Exec
8.6
Ratings
1% above category average
Percona Backup for MongoDB
-
Ratings
Universal recovery10.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Instant recovery7.50 Ratings00 Ratings
Recovery verification7.90 Ratings00 Ratings
Business application protection10.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Multiple backup destinations6.40 Ratings00 Ratings
Incremental backup identification7.90 Ratings00 Ratings
Backup to the cloud10.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Deduplication and file compression7.40 Ratings00 Ratings
Snapshots8.40 Ratings00 Ratings
Flexible deployment9.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Management dashboard9.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Platform support8.50 Ratings00 Ratings
Retention options8.40 Ratings00 Ratings
Encryption10.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Arctera Backup ExecPercona Backup for MongoDB
Small Businesses
Cove Data Protection
Cove Data Protection
Score 9.9 out of 10
Cove Data Protection
Cove Data Protection
Score 9.9 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Bacula Enterprise
Bacula Enterprise
Score 9.2 out of 10
Bacula Enterprise
Bacula Enterprise
Score 9.2 out of 10
Enterprises
Bacula Enterprise
Bacula Enterprise
Score 9.2 out of 10
Bacula Enterprise
Bacula Enterprise
Score 9.2 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Arctera Backup ExecPercona Backup for MongoDB
Likelihood to Recommend
8.3
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
1.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Usability
1.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Availability
4.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Performance
8.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
5.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
3.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Product Scalability
7.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Arctera Backup ExecPercona Backup for MongoDB
Likelihood to Recommend
One of the differentials is that of all the backup tools I used, Veritas Backup Exec has the best management and control interface. It is very easy to use and configure the rules. There are several options that we can optimize our work for our specific needs, from scheduling a backup, restoring data, directories, alerts system, error reports, backups, inconsistencies and other very interesting things. It has integration with SQL, vmware, hyper v. Backup and restore speeds are fast and secure.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Pros
  • The license/agent deployment feature in Backup Exec facilitates effective and speedy population within your data center.
  • Veritas Backup Exec's feature rich job creation is intuitive and simplifies backup strategies.
  • Customizable views in the Administrator console allow you to view your backup environment to maximize visibility.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Cons
  • The user interface can sometimes be sluggish and hang between options.The minimum spec is 2Gb but if running on a dedicated server I think 4Gb is recommended
  • As more companies seem to be entering the backup software market, Acronis is very aggressive on pricing and even offer discounts if you are replacing other backup solutions, the Backup Exec pricing plans have become a more expensive
  • Our version is an older 2014 version and has inadequate support for VM backs
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Likelihood to Renew
This software is a mess in my brutally honest opinion. I've spent more time babysitting this software while backing up 20 servers than I did with Veeam backing up 600+. I've had multiple jobs run fine for weeks at a time that just randomly fail out of the blue for seemingly no reason whatsoever. There's no intuitive way to chain jobs, so automation becomes somewhat more problematic if certain jobs depend on other jobs. The forever incremental feature feels tacked on since the merge operation merges all your incremental jobs into the most recent backup and doesn't have the option set a limit on how long to keep your point in time restores.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Usability
It can do a lot of things on paper and sounds terrific, but in practice it doesn't do any of them well. It can easily be sold to non-technical minds and C-levels, but of all the backup solutions I've used in the last 15 years of my career, Backup Exec is easily the least fault tolerant. Unless this software is a sunk cost and you're on a shoestring budget, I recommend almost anything else. Jobs fail often with obscure error codes and the KB articles in the Veritas support portal are a mess. Within 30 days of a fresh deployment I've logged more tickets with their support than I did in 3 years with Veeam.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Reliability and Availability
The weekly error on save needs a manual reload from me. The SDR can't restore the virtual machine of hyperV during a test.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Performance
No problem for this point it is in the average.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
In the few instances of having to contact support, our overall outcome was always good. They would have received a better score if the wait time was less, but I attribute this to the timing of support calls - it was during the previous owner's time. We have not had to open a support ticket since Veritas Backup Exec took the product back over.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Implementation Rating
It was pretty straightforward.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
Veritas Backup Exec is very comparable to Unitrends and in some areas is easier to use. The license side of Veritas Backup Exec is much more difficult to manage compared to Unitrends. Unitrends seems to be a much smoother solutions to protect virtual environments. Restoring data with Veritas Backup Exec is logical and easier to achieve, Unitrends is a bit less logical or intuitive.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Scalability
We only use it on the on-premise version on a single site.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Return on Investment
  • As the person tasked with the job of protecting the company's data, I am glad that Backup Exec performs that job well. I am able to often set-it-and-forget-it and go about the rest of my duties. I have never had a situation where Backup Exec was called upon to restore data and it was unable to do so. This reflects well on both me and my department and provides a sense of security to the rest of the company.
  • I am not making full use of the product and have not licensed a number of its features, but even the base feature set is impressive. To be clear, Backup Exec is no longer the only product we reply upon for data protection, but it is still a large part of that program. If an SMB can find the budget to afford to license the set of features meet its particular demands, Backup Exec will do what you need.
  • As an industry leader, Backup Exec is well positioned to stay at the head of the pack (as they have done for many years) and provide their customers with a comprehensive set of capabilities that will always remain in the forefront of technology.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
ScreenShots