Armor vs. Kaspersky Hybrid Cloud Security

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Armor
Score 6.0 out of 10
N/A
Armor is a cloud and mobile security solution. The vendor’s value proposition is that this solution was purpose-built to deliver the highest level of defense and control for an organization’s critical data, no matter where it’s hosted. The vendor says they are so confident in the ability of their solution to protect an organization’s data that they back it with their Cyber Warranty Guarantee.N/A
Kaspersky Hybrid Cloud Security
Score 9.0 out of 10
Small Businesses (1-50 employees)
Kaspersky Hybrid Cloud Security provides cloud-native protection for hybrid environments.N/A
Pricing
ArmorKaspersky Hybrid Cloud Security
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
ArmorKaspersky Hybrid Cloud Security
Free Trial
NoYes
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeOptional
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
ArmorKaspersky Hybrid Cloud Security
User Ratings
ArmorKaspersky Hybrid Cloud Security
Likelihood to Recommend
7.7
(0 ratings)
8.9
(0 ratings)
Usability
-
(0 ratings)
10.0
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
7.8
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
ArmorKaspersky Hybrid Cloud Security
Likelihood to Recommend
Armor gives you what you need to be successful regardless of technical ability. If you can maintain the systems yourself, you are definitely ahead of the game with their service. If you're not prepared to configure and maintain the systems, they do a pretty good job of getting it set up during the onboarding process so that you don't need to dig into the technical guts too much. If you find yourself in over your head, their support staff can handle it for you in most cases.
Read full review
We installed Kaspersky Hybrid Cloud Security on prem because it will affect bandwidth on cloud but you can control it to determine how much you want. But overall I prefer on prem. It's better and faster when you try to install endpoint on devices. It got all the features you want & you can control everything but the interface needs improvement.
Read full review
Pros
  • Security - we have requirements met right out of the box and the implementation of new resources is done with security in mind.
  • Speed - We can scale resources easy and the infrastructure is fast and efficient.
  • Responsiveness - Support tickets are handled very fast with almost immediate solutions.
Read full review
  • Protection from online frauds and scams
  • Secure from data leakage.
  • Easy and fast
  • Can be accessed in more than one device.
Read full review
Cons
  • Authentication and access against the secure messaging portal is overkill when the response I'm logging in to see merely says, "yes, we have your message. An agent will respond shortly". There should be an option to receive updates like this through email.
  • The online portal that allows us to clone servers is very slow to respond. More than once I've spun up an additional server due to the lack of visual feedback on the initial request.
  • The web application firewall does not seem to be sophisticated enough to differentiate between logged in administrators and end users. We use a CMS system which allows admins to create scripts. These often get barred by the WAF even though they are not malicious.
Read full review
  • Deployment process can be complicated and not work as expected.
  • Updating to the latest versions is complex and usually requires a reinstall.
  • The Secure Virtual Machines used for central scanning often become unable to communicate with Endpoints.
Read full review
Usability
No answers on this topic
Protection against advanced threats, as the solution includes advanced threat prevention technologies, such as sandboxing and detection of abnormal behavior in daily accesses. Centralized management, allows you to manage the security of several devices from a single management console.
Read full review
Support Rating
Approximately 50% of all messages we receive are automated. Either that an agent will be assigned, has been assigned, or a ticket is closed. I'd like to see more 'real' interaction, and less box ticking, though I appreciate process has to be followed. That's the one point off. Everything else is very good.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
No answers on this topic
We looked into competitors like Trend Micro and Sophos throughout our research into cloud security solutions. Kaspersky Hybrid Cloud Security stands out as the best option because of its superior threat detection capabilities, its ability to easily integrate with widespread cloud services, and its ability to adapt to our unique infrastructure requirements through a hybrid strategy.
Read full review
Return on Investment
No answers on this topic
  • Increased security posture by providing advanced threat protection and data loss prevention capabilities.
  • Business continuity by providing a robust security solution that ensures the protection of the organization's data and applications in the case of a security incident.
  • Increased productivity by providing a unified security management console that allows us to manage security for all of our environments from a single location.
Read full review
ScreenShots

Kaspersky Hybrid Cloud Security Screenshots

Screenshot of Screenshot of Screenshot of