Assistant.to is online scheduling software from the San Francisco based company of the same name.
N/A
Jotform
Score 8.4 out of 10
N/A
Jotform Enterprise is a digital workspace productivity tool that provides a platform for organizations. The aim of Jotform Enterprise is to give companies an easy-to-navigate tool that makes reaching out to customers, collaborating with coworkers, and collecting e-signatures and data a more seamless process. Jotform Enterprise strives to enable companies to make data-driven decisions without compromising when it comes to quality and security. It doesn’t matter what type of…
$0
Pricing
Assistant.to
Jotform
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
Free
$0.00
Bronze
$34.00
Monthly
Silver
$39.00
Monthly
Gold
$99.00
Monthly
Enterprise
Custom
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Assistant.to
Jotform
Free Trial
No
Yes
Free/Freemium Version
No
Yes
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No
No
Entry-level Setup Fee
No setup fee
No setup fee
Additional Details
—
—
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Assistant.to
Jotform
Features
Assistant.to
Jotform
Survey Format & Appearance
Comparison of Survey Format & Appearance features of Product A and Product B
Assistant.to
-
Ratings
Jotform
8.0
143 Ratings
0% above category average
Survey templates
00 Ratings
8.6122 Ratings
Themes
00 Ratings
7.4129 Ratings
Custom logo/branding
00 Ratings
8.2135 Ratings
Survey Content
Comparison of Survey Content features of Product A and Product B
Assistant.to
-
Ratings
Jotform
7.6
135 Ratings
11% below category average
Changes to live survey
00 Ratings
7.6114 Ratings
Question design help
00 Ratings
7.5111 Ratings
Multiple question types
00 Ratings
7.7132 Ratings
Survey Logic
Comparison of Survey Logic features of Product A and Product B
Assistant.to
-
Ratings
Jotform
7.3
111 Ratings
12% below category average
Survey logic flexibility
00 Ratings
7.3111 Ratings
Survey Reporting & Analytics
Comparison of Survey Reporting & Analytics features of Product A and Product B
Assistant.to
-
Ratings
Jotform
7.5
137 Ratings
8% below category average
Response tracking
00 Ratings
7.6128 Ratings
Data export
00 Ratings
7.9130 Ratings
Standard reports
00 Ratings
7.7116 Ratings
Custom reports
00 Ratings
7.4108 Ratings
Analytics
00 Ratings
7.2102 Ratings
Survey Administration & Security
Comparison of Survey Administration & Security features of Product A and Product B
Assistant.to
-
Ratings
Jotform
7.4
112 Ratings
16% below category average
Access controls
00 Ratings
7.4108 Ratings
Compliance
00 Ratings
7.4102 Ratings
Survey Distribution
Comparison of Survey Distribution features of Product A and Product B
Assistant.to is well suited for anyone working with a large number of clients at once who need to schedule multiple meetings. If those clients do not have a background in online scheduling, then using this tool may not be the best solution. Assistant.to is a great tool for quickly scheduling meetings with options across 3 days, but for those wanting more flexibility you may want to consider Calendly.
We use it for mostly community surveys and I absolutely prefer it over any other survey program out there. It is easy to create, easy to understand and easy to navigate. I love the QR code option it creates for you to share your form/ survey with others. It really is the best out there!
The app currently does not save the availability times that I select, therefore I have to re-select my availability every time I sent meeting options.
The app does not have the ability to customize the theme or styles of the meeting times. It'd be nice to allow users to choose between a set of themes to better fit their company's brand.
If Assistant.to had a scheduling link option like Calendly has, that would be another improvement. Sometimes we'll have customers who cannot meet until the following week, so having a scheduler link would be helpful in those situations.
As a seasoned user who relies on seamless online forms for a multitude of purposes, I can confidently attest that JotForm has not only simplified the form creation process but has also elevated it to new heights.JotForm's interface is a masterpiece of intuitive design. Even if you're a newcomer to the world of online form creation, the platform's user-friendly layout will have you crafting professional-grade forms in no time.
I honestly have not used the support feature with Jotform. From what I can see when I look information up, everything I want to do something that I can't figure out myself it seems to not be a possible solution or edit that Jotform is currently capable of.
the most valuable things that Jotform give free trial, so the resistant users can get the experiences of the easiness and more handling to the digital things
When I first started at my current company, I used this tool because it was what the rest of the team used. However, since I learned about Calendly, who recently released a feature similar to Assistant.to, I've actually switched to Calendly. Calendly also has the ability to create a scheduling link where someone can choose a time based on the parameters you set. This has proven to be more helpful for certain clients.
Typeform is better hands down [in my opinion]. It's not even a comparison as [I feel] JotForm doesn't work properly and [from my experience I think] their support is very problematic. I would suggest using Typeform or using GravityForms as an alternative to JotForm. Whatever you do, [I feel you shouldn't] depend on JotForm for something that is important to your business or research project.
It has reduced our back and forth setting up appointments allowing sales to get more appointments faster.
Our client success team is able to quickly provide their available time.
Only real con is that the calendar is not real time and if a person clicks on a time that is not open, they don't find out until after they've gone to the site. But that is a limit of emails, not their tech.
It saved me time. Within minutes I was able to create and share forms to collect demographic data.
While struggling to use another software, I thought of Jotform and it was able to assist me with collating the data I had to confirm results previously obtained.
I could not easily identify what new information was provided in a resubmission by a respondent.