TrustRadius

Atfinity vs. ProcessMaker

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Atfinity
Score 0.0 out of 10
Mid-Size Companies (51-1,000 employees)
Atfinity is a no-code platform for financial institutions, used to automate, orchestrate, and optimise client processes. Atfinity makes it possible to build and deploy automated workflows tailored to unique requirements with a no-code approach. Its suite of services enable integration of core banking systems with customer-facing applications, including onboarding, KYC/KYB/AML compliance checks, and lifecycle management, to ensure a smooth data flow and create a connected ecosystem.…N/A
ProcessMaker
Score 9.0 out of 10
N/A
ProcessMaker is a process automation platform that helps organizations optimize and scale their business operations. By combining workflow automation, AI-driven decision-making, and advanced analytics, ProcessMaker empowers businesses to streamline complex processes, improve efficiency, and enhance customer experiences.N/A
Pricing
AtfinityProcessMaker
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
AtfinityProcessMaker
Free Trial
NoYes
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeRequiredNo setup fee
Additional DetailsSet up pricing depends on the effective setup effort. License fee depends on various variables such as number of processes, number of users, number of integration—
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
AtfinityProcessMaker
Considered Both Products
Atfinity

No answer on this topic

ProcessMaker
Verified User
Anonymous
Chose ProcessMaker
We looked at all and tested some with the final recommendation being for ProcessMaker. The features the were key to our decision making were its easy integration options and capabilities, its open source version for our extended customization needs and its ease of use and web …
Patrick Stephens | TrustRadius Reviewer
Patrick Stephens
Director Of Communications
Chose ProcessMaker
In the short run, ProcessMaker blows KiSSFLOW away. It is easy to understand and use. But in the long run, once you get into more complicated actions, they equal out. The price was right, and while we eventually went for another option, ProcessMaker would have been the next …
HUMBERTO RAMIREZ SANCHEZ HIDALGO | TrustRadius Reviewer
HUMBERTO RAMIREZ SANCHEZ HIDALGO
Area Director - Large Enterprises Banking
Chose ProcessMaker
Before making the decision to get ProcessMaker, we assessed different and best options in the market, which are also quite competitive. Kissflow, Blueworks Live, and Bizagi, being the most relevant and Adonis, to mention the ones we consider the most relevant and capable of …
Hussain Jawadwala | TrustRadius Reviewer
Hussain Jawadwala
Business Owner
Chose ProcessMaker
It is far cheaper than JIRA. I have used JIRA , the UI is good as compared to processmaker. But compared to workflow designing and management, I found processmaker far easier. And yes ProcessMaker requires less resources to run on.
Verified User
Anonymous
Chose ProcessMaker
Based on our experience, the agent for ProcessMaker Task Mining is more robust than for either of the competing products. However Celonis is has a significantly more mature user interface, and UiPath has a significantly more configurable interface.
Features
AtfinityProcessMaker
Reporting & Analytics
Comparison of Reporting & Analytics features of Product A and Product B
Atfinity
-
Ratings
ProcessMaker
9.3
Ratings
14% above category average
Dashboards00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Standard reports00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Custom reports00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Process Engine
Comparison of Process Engine features of Product A and Product B
Atfinity
-
Ratings
ProcessMaker
9.2
Ratings
25% above category average
Process designer00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Process simulation00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Business rules engine00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
SOA support00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Process player00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Form builder00 Ratings9.70 Ratings
Model execution00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
AtfinityProcessMaker
Small Businesses
CMW Platform
CMW Platform
Score 8.9 out of 10
CMW Platform
CMW Platform
Score 8.9 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Quixy
Quixy
Score 9.9 out of 10
Quixy
Quixy
Score 9.9 out of 10
Enterprises
Redwood RunMyJobs
Redwood RunMyJobs
Score 9.6 out of 10
Redwood RunMyJobs
Redwood RunMyJobs
Score 9.6 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
AtfinityProcessMaker
Likelihood to Recommend
-
(0 ratings)
9.0
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
AtfinityProcessMaker
Likelihood to Recommend
No answers on this topic
I loved it. You will not get an easier interface. You can develop workflow processes in a simple way, one which allows anyone to understand what you are trying to accomplish; however, you will get into some issues if your employees are scared of coding (when you get to the advanced features). For some, this will never be an issue as the knowledge you need is very basic. But for the school I was working with, it would have stopped them cold
Patrick Stephens | TrustRadius Reviewer
Patrick Stephens
Director Of Communications
Read full review
Pros
No answers on this topic
  • Connecting activities across applications which are not part of the core landscape (e.g. Excel, MS Teams)
  • Being able to identify activities being performed such as typing into a form, reading content on pages, or navigating between pages in an application.
  • Identify copy / paste events, including the source system / application being copied from and the target.
Verified User
Anonymous
Read full review
Cons
No answers on this topic
  • Complications when you get to the more advanced pieces. When trialing, I found that the more advanced a process got, the more complicated it got for me in coding. When you begin using the more advanced features, you will find that you need to have a basic knowledge of coding - otherwise you won't go any further. This was my sole issue. Unfortunately, it was one that would have brought the school to a grinding halt if they were to ever get more complicated than they were.
Patrick Stephens | TrustRadius Reviewer
Patrick Stephens
Director Of Communications
Read full review
Usability
No answers on this topic
I gave this overall rating for ProcessMaker due to its overall flexibility, design and ease of use for most. Examples of this from us include it being an excellent and trustworthy tool for automating processes, the abilities and capabilities for real-time process tracking and the web-based accessibility and implementation which allows for easy access and management of the tool.
Verified User
Anonymous
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
No answers on this topic
Based on our experience, the agent for ProcessMaker Task Mining is more robust than for either of the competing products. However Celonis is has a significantly more mature user interface, and UiPath has a significantly more configurable interface.
Verified User
Anonymous
Read full review
Scalability
No answers on this topic
I gave this rating for the adaptability and growth for Processmaker for its many capabilities for support and flexibility. These include ease of integration with many other systems, its open source version for its extended customization and capabilities of the tool and its low-code / no-code capabilities to be able to easily design and automate processes with minimal or no-code.
Verified User
Anonymous
Read full review
Return on Investment
No answers on this topic
  • I'm using Communication edition to introduce BPMN in my organization. I can build the first process in a short time, make my boss more confident with my job.
  • But, with ProcessMaker, we need more time to design code to handle the process, and without PHP/Javascript Programmer, it seems hard to work with more and more processes online.
  • However, IE Browser is not well supported, somewhat let the user confuse.
Simon Huang | TrustRadius Reviewer
Simon Huang
System Development Manager
Read full review
ScreenShots