athenaIDX vs. CareLogic EHR

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
athenaIDX
Score 1.0 out of 10
N/A
athenaIDX is an on-premise or cloud-hosted enterprise RCM solution that helps health systems, hospitals, billing services, and large practices optimize financial performance and successfully adapt to healthcare payment reform. It is based on the Centricity medical practice and EMR software that was formerly owned and supported by GE Healthcare acquired by Veritas Capital in 2018, spun off into a new entity (Virence Health), and then rebranded as a product of athenahealth (also a Veritas…N/A
CareLogic EHR
Score 10.0 out of 10
N/A
Qualifacts, headquartered in Nashville, is the developer of the CareLogic enterprise electronic health record system. CareLogic provides scheduling, documentation, billing and reporting designed specifically for behavioral health and human services organizations across the United States.N/A
Pricing
athenaIDXCareLogic EHR
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
athenaIDXCareLogic EHR
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeRequired
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
athenaIDXCareLogic EHR
Considered Both Products
athenaIDX
Chose athenaIDX
Athena IDX is more expensive, has less features, is less modern, interfaces with our modern systems poorly and has actively created more manual work across the company. Each of the systems above are better in every conceivable way compared to this program.
Chose athenaIDX
Athena IDX is more reliable than other platforms. It rarely has latency challenges where it has to be intermittently shut down or updated. It is accessible on multiple devices and overall, easy to use and navigate.
Chose athenaIDX
During my medical rotations I have used multiple products similar to Centricity, but I found Centricity to be one of the easiest to use and one of the easiest systems to learn.
Chose athenaIDX
I did not select Centricity. It was the hospital's main EMR during my rotation there. I would say Soarian is best, but only because I have used that EMR more than the others.
Chose athenaIDX
It stacks up and can surpass most of the systems out there.GE has been a leader in their industry in healthcare since I started.
CareLogic EHR
Chose CareLogic EHR
Cerner was much less organized, and users in our company generally felt it was harder to utilize. There was less options for customization that fit our specific use demographics, and crashing was much more frequent. Obtaining hard copies through Carelogic EHR, by Qualifacts is …
Chose CareLogic EHR
CareLogic is more a affordable that other competitors. CareLogic takes less time to understand and incorporate. I would say that it has its limitations and is not as intuitive. There is a lot of clicking back and forth between functions and can be annoying. There is also …
Chose CareLogic EHR
CareLogic is severely lacking compared to systems such as Allscripts and EPIC. Even NextGen has more options for medical professionals for charting, achieving quality improvement measures, and medication e-prescribing and tracking.
Chose CareLogic EHR
CareLogic is extremely user friendly and intuitive. It also has a very nice Windows-based user interface which is pleasant to look at and easy to read.
Features
athenaIDXCareLogic EHR
Billing and Claims Management
Comparison of Billing and Claims Management features of Product A and Product B
athenaIDX
-
Ratings
CareLogic EHR
4.2
Ratings
57% below category average
Claims management00 Ratings4.00 Ratings
Coding00 Ratings4.90 Ratings
Patient billing00 Ratings3.90 Ratings
Financial Reporting00 Ratings3.90 Ratings
Patient Scheduling
Comparison of Patient Scheduling features of Product A and Product B
athenaIDX
-
Ratings
CareLogic EHR
6.5
Ratings
19% below category average
Rule-based scheduling00 Ratings7.80 Ratings
Multi-location support00 Ratings3.90 Ratings
Calendar interface00 Ratings7.70 Ratings
Electronic Medical Records
Comparison of Electronic Medical Records features of Product A and Product B
athenaIDX
-
Ratings
CareLogic EHR
5.6
Ratings
26% below category average
Charting / document management00 Ratings6.00 Ratings
Templates00 Ratings3.00 Ratings
Patient portal00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Mobile/tablet support00 Ratings5.80 Ratings
Fax integration00 Ratings2.00 Ratings
Integration with other EMR and PM systems00 Ratings2.00 Ratings
Workflow automation00 Ratings6.70 Ratings
Customization00 Ratings7.70 Ratings
E-prescribing00 Ratings7.70 Ratings
Medical Security and Privacy
Comparison of Medical Security and Privacy features of Product A and Product B
athenaIDX
-
Ratings
CareLogic EHR
4.5
Ratings
59% below category average
HIPAA compliance00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Role-based permission levels00 Ratings1.00 Ratings
Data backups and redundancy00 Ratings6.00 Ratings
Local mode / networking failsafe00 Ratings1.00 Ratings
Workflow and Scale
Comparison of Workflow and Scale features of Product A and Product B
athenaIDX
-
Ratings
CareLogic EHR
2.6
Ratings
98% below category average
Task tracking00 Ratings5.80 Ratings
Specialty-specific workflows00 Ratings1.00 Ratings
Multi-office / multi-physician capabilities00 Ratings1.10 Ratings
Best Alternatives
athenaIDXCareLogic EHR
Small Businesses
Tebra Billing & Payments
Tebra Billing & Payments
Score 7.0 out of 10
athenaClinicals
athenaClinicals
Score 9.6 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
CareLogic EHR
CareLogic EHR
Score 10.0 out of 10
athenaClinicals
athenaClinicals
Score 9.6 out of 10
Enterprises

No answers on this topic

Epic
Epic
Score 9.5 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
athenaIDXCareLogic EHR
Likelihood to Recommend
1.0
(0 ratings)
10.0
(0 ratings)
Performance
-
(0 ratings)
3.0
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
-
(0 ratings)
8.0
(0 ratings)
Online Training
1.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Configurability
1.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Vendor post-sale
1.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
athenaIDXCareLogic EHR
Likelihood to Recommend
Athena is a well-suited electronic medical record system for those professionals that work in a medical center, hospital, clinic, and/or outpatient clinic that need to provide frequent and accurate documentation for insurance providers and all other members of the care team. It might be less appropriate for a small agency.
Read full review
CareLogic is a fairly low-cost EHR. It would work well for a small practice/agency where you will be focused on one thing. Agencies with multiple areas (i.e. outpatient, inpatient, case management) should use caution as it is difficult to ensure a user is only accessing the information they should have access to. The ability to manage many different types of programs is difficult with this system. Any agency looking to be able to report on their data should look elsewhere.
Read full review
Pros
  • One of the best things about Centricity is it is flexible. We are able to add a data point behind a term (CPS calls this an observation term) and track any data needed. These observation terms also allow us to pull information forward and display information needed to make a good decision or used to decrease errors. For example in our history forms given to the patients one of the questions is side of injury. This affected side displays on our EMR forms which helps providers and prevents mistakes.
  • CPS integrates with other programs. We are paperless and use DocuSign to send each patient their history, ROS and all new paperwork. This allows us to import the history into the forms and has saved us from adding extra staff (FTEs) to room and take history. The history form can be completed at home or in the waiting room. Each section has a observation term behind it and allows it to be placed into the note at the correct section. Since we have a fully integrated product we do not have to have another program to enter or transfer our charges from the EMR to the PM side of the program.
  • Our notes look great! We did a lot of customization which gave us the detail and look we wanted. It seems like a lot of work at first, but the outcome has so much efficacy. We increased our providers without having to increase our staffing and it is due to he efficiencies we gained by using the EMR.
  • One other note, Centricity is flexible but that means it is complicated. You can not have flexibility without it be complicated don't let that stop you the end results can be great.
Read full review
  • CareLogic is very intuitive and easy to navigate.
  • CareLogic is designed for behavioral health users, so unnecessary paperwork and data is eliminated.
  • CareLogic is web-based, so it can be accessed from anywhere.
  • CareLogic is customizable for each organization's unique needs.
Read full review
Cons
  • Statements print only current open accounts, would be nice to print a total statement for patients so they can see if payments are split between open and closed/zeroed out accounts
  • Ability to create custom reports
Read full review
  • CareLogic needs to update its user interface. Outside of the fact that it looks like it's running on the Windows 2000 operating system, navigating takes a massive effort. Nothing seems to be where you would think it would be, however, if you favorite the items you use the most, they are only two to three clicks away.
  • Reporting functionality is terrible. Without an intimate knowledge of how the reports are configured, moving our billing data from CareLogic to our accounting system produces errors every month. We have had to hire a consultant to help us figure out the errors and why they keep occurring which brings me to my next point.
  • Customer service could be better. In my experience, I'm typically on hold and when I finally get someone on the phone they have no idea what the issue is. Since we use CareLogic throughout our organization, any amount of wait time on getting the system fixed causes massive chaos because we use the system to make notes in our client files.
Read full review
Performance
No answers on this topic
The rating of "3" represents CareLogic's quick loading of pages, however, the reports are super slow and there is no progress bar or notification to let you know if a report is running or not. I've let a report run for an hour before only to find out that the interface never registered my click to run the report.
Read full review
Support Rating
No answers on this topic
The customer support at Qualifacts is great. When you have an issue you can submit a ticket to support and they're on top of getting things straightened out and always available by phone as well. The struggle with the overall support is it doesn't seem like the needs of the users are heard. When you ask for what should be a simple fix or something that seems the system is missing, it gets labeled an Enhancement Request which is where requests go to pasture.
Read full review
Online Training
Training consists of overly specific points with no general process considerations. Trainers will regularly go 'into the weeds' on pointless edge cases while the meat of the training still needs to be addressed.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
Athena IDX is more expensive, has less features, is less modern, interfaces with our modern systems poorly and has actively created more manual work across the company. Each of the systems above are better in every conceivable way compared to this program.
Read full review
Cerner was much less organized, and users in our company generally felt it was harder to utilize. There was less options for customization that fit our specific use demographics, and crashing was much more frequent. Obtaining hard copies through Carelogic EHR, by Qualifacts is much easier as well with the print report radio button.
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • Extremely expensive software for the limited feature set. We're talking millions of dollars with off hours support (anything outside of 8-6EST) that starts at $1200 for the first hour and $300 for each hour afterwards.
  • Multitasking isn't a thing unless you assign more licenses (thereby increasing your costs). Users can quite literally only have one IDX window open at a time unless you assign more licenses. This slows down everyone as there are plenty of times where examining different parts of a patient's profile is useful.
  • Reporting has been nearly impossible as we use modern reporting software. IDX's analytics site is firmly stuck in the 1990s and lacks decades of innovation present in something like Power BI.
  • Nickel and diming philosophy. A limited API server costs ~$10k/month. Setting up a new facility in IDX costs you and requires a 4 month lead time. Many more instances of this.
Read full review
  • No more paper records.
  • Prescriptions never get lost.
  • Staff have many complaints about work flow.
  • New hire training has to be ongoing- it's hard to learn.
Read full review
ScreenShots

CareLogic EHR Screenshots

Screenshot of Screenshot of Screenshot of Client profile/dashboardScreenshot of Form builderScreenshot of Client list / caseloadScreenshot of Menu management tools