Atlassian Crowd vs. Cisco Duo

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Atlassian Crowd
Score 6.0 out of 10
N/A
Atlassian Crowd is a single sign-on (SSO) solution from Australian-headquartered software company Atlassian.N/A
Cisco Duo
Score 9.5 out of 10
N/A
Cisco Duo is a two-factor authentication system (2FA), acquired by Cisco in October 2018. It provides single sign-on (SSO) and endpoint visibility, as well as access controls and policy controlled adaptive authentication.
$3
per month per user
Pricing
Atlassian CrowdCisco Duo
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
Duo Essentials
$3
per month per user
Duo Advantage
$6
per month per user
Duo Premier
$9
per month per user
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Atlassian CrowdCisco Duo
Free Trial
NoYes
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Atlassian CrowdCisco Duo
Considered Both Products
Atlassian Crowd
Chose Atlassian Crowd
Atlassian Crowd is just much easier to set up, plus most of our systems we use are from Atlassian, they work with Atlassian Crowd out of the box without much effort, so it ended up being the natural choice for us.
Chose Atlassian Crowd
These products allow you to install them on your own infrastructure, so you can manage all aspects of them which can prevent you from getting throttled from API calls. When you hit a certain threshold of scale you may need to switch off of atlassian Cloud to your own hardware. …
Chose Atlassian Crowd
In most ways, I preferred DUO Security as it offered a better 2-factor authentication method, and Crowd is definitely better than just having to rely on Active Directory.

I have always been of the mind to have a centralized server that sits between your active directory (azure …
Cisco Duo
Chose Cisco Duo
None, we are happy with offering Cisco Duo
Chose Cisco Duo
Cisco Identity Services Engine (ISE)
Chose Cisco Duo
Cisco Duo supplements the above products in providing MFA
Chose Cisco Duo
Cisco Duo provides a much richer user experience, the UI is way more modern, and the product itself is easier to use.
Chose Cisco Duo
I would fully expect a competitor like Okta or any other multifactor mechanic to function pretty similarly, and I hesitate to say duos the best. I think the idea is that it's a simple concept, but it does it well. So I haven't evaluated any myself outside of duo, but I'm also …
Chose Cisco Duo
Cisco Duo was much better suited to integrate with our Citrix solution.
Chose Cisco Duo
We didn't evaluate any other MFA solutions to compare outside of using Keeper as a password vault but that works in conjunction with Cisco Duo.
Chose Cisco Duo
The organization chose Cisco Duo prior to the acquisition with its strong brand and reputation from the security community.
Chose Cisco Duo
Cisco is one of our trusted solution vendors and Cisco Duo can be good integrated to our security landscape.
Chose Cisco Duo
It's more easy and user-friendly.
Chose Cisco Duo
Similar but priced quite well as part of a product suite.
Chose Cisco Duo
Cisco Duo had an integrated method for handling MFA on Endpoints and Servers. This was a huge bonus. Administration and implementation seemed more efficient as well.
Chose Cisco Duo
Cisco Secure Access by Duo is the best and most familiar. Users have no issues using it and it is a breeze to administer as well.
Chose Cisco Duo
There are Okta has that Duo does not have, however since my environment has CISCO solutions implemented and the service that we receive from the vendor and integrator is top quality, DUO was the right choice.
Chose Cisco Duo
We selected Cisco Secure Access by Duo due to its ability to interoperate with almost any on premise, cloud, or hybrid application or system. Duo also integrates nicely with our other security systems, including XDR. As well, Duo is a market leader and always pushing the sector …
Chose Cisco Duo
Cisco Secure Access by Duo's ability to integrate with a wide variety of SSO applications and systems, as well as its focus on usability, make it an attractive option.
Best Alternatives
Atlassian CrowdCisco Duo
Small Businesses
WatchGuard AuthPoint
WatchGuard AuthPoint
Score 9.1 out of 10
WatchGuard AuthPoint
WatchGuard AuthPoint
Score 9.1 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
OneLogin by One Identity
OneLogin by One Identity
Score 9.6 out of 10
WatchGuard AuthPoint
WatchGuard AuthPoint
Score 9.1 out of 10
Enterprises
OneLogin by One Identity
OneLogin by One Identity
Score 9.6 out of 10
Microsoft Entra ID
Microsoft Entra ID
Score 8.7 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Atlassian CrowdCisco Duo
Likelihood to Recommend
8.0
(0 ratings)
9.4
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
-
(0 ratings)
9.8
(0 ratings)
Usability
-
(0 ratings)
9.9
(0 ratings)
Availability
-
(0 ratings)
9.8
(0 ratings)
Performance
-
(0 ratings)
8.7
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
9.0
(0 ratings)
9.9
(0 ratings)
Online Training
-
(0 ratings)
10.0
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
-
(0 ratings)
9.8
(0 ratings)
Configurability
-
(0 ratings)
10.0
(0 ratings)
Ease of integration
-
(0 ratings)
9.9
(0 ratings)
Product Scalability
-
(0 ratings)
9.3
(0 ratings)
Vendor post-sale
-
(0 ratings)
9.3
(0 ratings)
Vendor pre-sale
-
(0 ratings)
9.3
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Atlassian CrowdCisco Duo
Likelihood to Recommend
For smaller companies Atlassian crowd is great, however, we grew to a size where we were getting rate limited so we needed to scale up. What we ended up migrating to was the non-cloud solutions for Atlassian products. This allowed us to hit our scale without being rate limited. However, at a smaller scale, this product would work great.
Read full review
Cisco Duois is well suited in all kinds of scenarios where you need to ensure proper security measurements, I think. We can't just rely on our passwords only, as they can be easily stolen through phishing or data breaches thus keeping multi factor authentication is quite essential. I always prefer MFA or at least 2FA for any critical system.
Read full review
Pros
  • Many different options for authentication, including credential validation only, user detail synchronization, and more
  • Many different levels of access control, including, user, group, and application-level
Read full review
  • Speed - it's fast with almost no delay between triggering the MFA request and receiving the notification on an iPhone
  • Security - in addition to the added MFA layer, a simple, 4-digit passcode can be added to the authentication request
  • Ease of use - it doesn't scare users. It's simple to install, configure, and use.
Read full review
Cons
  • We did not get the speed that we needed vs. hosting our own local atlassian product
  • Configuring accounts could have been easier
  • I didn't like the process for installing extensions
Read full review
  • Documentation is oftentimes missing key information for proper implementation. This is circumvented by reading third-party guides or contacting support for additional details.
  • They do not push Fail-Closed as much as I think they should. Fail-Open is fairly trivial to bypass and it should be made known to the customer during setup how much this will affect overall security.
  • More vendor integration is something that is always craved by administrators. There are so many third-parties to integrate with.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
No answers on this topic
There are a lot of competing solutions on the market; however, Duo "just works", and there is little to no learning curve for the new members to be acclimated to it. As long as that continues I see it as the preferred option moving forward
Read full review
Usability
No answers on this topic
La interfaz es intuitiva y fácil de navegar, lo que permite a los usuarios administrar sus dispositivos y acceder a las políticas sin problemas. La integración con las aplicaciones SSO y SaaS facilita aún más el proceso de acceso, mejorando la experiencia del usuario.
Read full review
Reliability and Availability
No answers on this topic
In the last 5+ years we've been using Duo, there may have been 1 outage that impacted us. We do receive periodic notifications of issues but, for the most part, they impact carriers or functionality that we either don't use, or do not care about.
Read full review
Performance
No answers on this topic
We do not see any degradation of performance of the protected applications. There are occasional lags in receiving the push but no show stooppers.
Read full review
Support Rating
Overall, support is good, you get quick responses from Atlassian's official support system, and documentation is decent enough for you to find what you need.
Read full review
Since it’s a reputable company, I have received technical support when needed and I trust that if anything else happens I can contact them with any issues. I haven’t experienced bad customer service and I totally feel supported while using this authentication method. No complains so far and the high rating!
Read full review
In-Person Training
No answers on this topic
There was no in person training but checking the box was the only way I could complete all of the questions.
Read full review
Online Training
No answers on this topic
This was not organized training but the videos that Duo provides to teach you how to install a particular integration are top notch.
Read full review
Implementation Rating
No answers on this topic
Implementation was straight forward and you can isolate different scenarios in order to test new application setup or add to an existing setup. Gui interface is pretty easy to understand and follow. I had no experience with Duo and still manage to easily set up new policies and rules.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Atlassian Crowd is just much easier to set up, plus most of our systems we use are from Atlassian, they work with Atlassian Crowd out of the box without much effort, so it ended up being the natural choice for us.
Read full review
Ultimately we ended up going with Cisco Duo because we are a Cisco shop. All of our networking infrastructure, our phones, our wireless environment is Cisco based. It made logical sense to stay with a product that we already have a line of support with. With a smaller support / tech group we depend on outside Cisco support. That support is already here for us, so we stayed with a Cisco product.
Read full review
Scalability
No answers on this topic
So far, the only limits we've encountered were tied to our imagination. Duo's strong list of supported integrations is amazing.
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • New systems are tough when it comes to an ROI, as a dollar amount for saving time on a sign-in can be tough to track. Like most new systems that makes things slightly easier to execute as an end user or manage or support, it really might come down to the existing structure of how a company manages its users.
  • The positives are always with the end user, which I have to say, Crowd was able to accomplish.
Read full review
  • It's one of those things that only costs money in the sense of you have to convince a leadership team to spend money to save money, right? Like a compromise is far more expensive than duo paying for duo. So specifically it's really just about trying to prevent problems. And so while it costs money and we don't have a direct return on investment that we can point out immediately, I would still always advocate for it just because it keeps security. Paying for security is cheaper than getting compromised essentially.
Read full review
ScreenShots