TrustRadius

AttributeStudio vs. gINT

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
AttributeStudio
Score 2.5 out of 10
N/A
AttributeStudio offers advanced quantitative analysis and description of geological formations and reservoirs, and is offered by Geomodeling Technology Corp in Calgary.N/A
gINT
Score 5.0 out of 10
N/A
Bentley Systems offers gINT, a set of applications that generate and present subsurface data for mining and other purposes.N/A
Pricing
AttributeStudiogINT
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
AttributeStudiogINT
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details——
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
AttributeStudiogINT
Considered Both Products
AttributeStudio

No answer on this topic

gINT
Verified User
Anonymous
Chose gINT
I find Holebase much more user-friendly and intuitive although have not used for as long as gINT. It seems to handle the data in a much more reliable way and I've yet to find pesky bugs. Whilst gINT feels like a polished interface to what is in essence a simple database, …
User Ratings
AttributeStudiogINT
Likelihood to Recommend
-
(0 ratings)
7.0
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
AttributeStudiogINT
Likelihood to Recommend
No answers on this topic
Suitable for all organisations that are required to collate, store and generate borehole site logs in a timely and orderly fashion. Can also be used for the storage of .ags data if setup correctly. Handles multiple projects well but is not without hiccups when used regularly. I believe it is possible to draw section views however have not done so myself.
Verified User
Anonymous
Read full review
Pros
No answers on this topic
  • Borehole logs
  • Storage of geotech data.
  • Customisable
Verified User
Anonymous
Read full review
Cons
No answers on this topic
  • Bugs bugs bugs.
  • Confusing interface.
  • Split-logs cumbersome to generate.
Verified User
Anonymous
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
No answers on this topic
I find Holebase much more user-friendly and intuitive although have not used for as long as gINT. It seems to handle the data in a much more reliable way and I've yet to find pesky bugs. Whilst gINT feels like a polished interface to what is in essence a simple database, Holebase feels like a bespoke piece of software.
Verified User
Anonymous
Read full review
Return on Investment
No answers on this topic
  • Central piece of software for collation and storage of all site data.
  • Storage and checker of ags data.
  • Professional looking logs.
Verified User
Anonymous
Read full review
ScreenShots