Auth0 vs. HID DigitalPersona

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Auth0
Score 9.9 out of 10
N/A
Auth0 is an identity management platform for developers and application teams. It gives users a platform to authenticate and authorize, providing secure access to applications, devices, and users. Auth0 aims to provide the simplicity, extensibility, and expertise to scale and protect any application, for any audience. Integrate Auth0 into any app, written in any language, and any framework.
$23
per month
HID DigitalPersona
Score 9.3 out of 10
N/A
HID DigitalPersona (formerly Crossmatch) provides a comprehensive multi-factor authentication solution. The vendor’s value proposition is that their solution frees users from cumbersome login activities while making it easy for an IT Team to secure access to their networks, data and applications.
$3.75
per user per month
Pricing
Auth0HID DigitalPersona
Editions & Modules
1,000 External Active Users
$23
per month
2,000 External Active Users
$57
per month
5,000 External Active Users
$114
per month
500 External Active Machines
$130
per month
10,000 External Active Users
$228
per month
20,000 External Active Users
$455
per month
50,000 External Active Users
1,138
per month
Over 50,000 External Active Users
Contact for quote
Enterprise
Contact for quote
HID DigitalPersona
$3.75
per user per month
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Auth0HID DigitalPersona
Free Trial
YesYes
Free/Freemium Version
YesNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeOptionalRequired
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Auth0HID DigitalPersona
Considered Both Products
Auth0
Chose Auth0
It was long ago , cognito was in its early days and had critical bug about email case sensitive. Okta Developer lack the separation in model we wanted ,meaning modeling our tenants to their model . we didn't want to create an App per tenant , and wanted some shared …
Chose Auth0
Firebase: Pricing is too high and the efficiency and store option is not an ROI point. Okta: Too high pricing. Lack of secure code not good for mobile application auth.
Chose Auth0
Great product and large user base, easier to integrate.
We used Auth0 to take care of single sign-on from all of our clients' auth domains. After initial development to integrate Auth0 with our systems, our client onboard has been very much simplified. The SSO integration …
Chose Auth0
Auth0 is one of the best login solutions for any website or application. The pricing is more considerable than other similar software. It is easy to use and does not require much effort in deploying. However, the deployment process is not so simple for drag and drop websites or …
Chose Auth0
Auth0's documentation, framework support, large community, and overall developer experience make the cost trade-off worthwhile. Auth0's developer experience makes it significantly easier for our firm to quickly develop apps that require user accounts, even if we use an SPA or a …
Chose Auth0
Auth0 is non-evasive and does not require software download. It is user friendly, seamless, and doesn't require additional actions on the part of the user. IBM Trusteer is none of these things and is based on a technology stack that cannot scale in the same way as Auth0. We …
Chose Auth0
We decided [on] Auth as the first product. We used it for about a year on [the] free plan and then switched to the current plan.
Chose Auth0
I thought Auth0 had a better customer service and experience when compared to Okta.
Chose Auth0
Auth0 allows many other functionalities than the other products, such as customization of auth flows, emails, security options, etc. The Authentication & Management APIs also allow us to easily create and modify users, roles and permissions, by automating or integrating Auth0 …
Chose Auth0
We went with Auth0 over Okta due to price concerns and the overall simplicity of Auth0. We chose Auth0 over Amazon Cognito because Cognito has very poor documentation and client library support. Auth0 offers a service that hits the sweet spot for organizations with small …
Chose Auth0
Auth0 was chosen over Keycloak mainly because of poor documentation and various challenges that came with working with an open-source application. Auth0 was polished and provided SDKs and reliable Enterprise support.
Chose Auth0
Compare to AWS cognito, Auth0 is easy to setup. The API is nice to work with and flexible. And the backend administration dashboard is very robust and easy to use. Also, the pricing is reasonable based on the subscription version and online usage. The services are well …
Chose Auth0
The one that is worth a serious consideration from this list is okta. Their platform is built pretty well.
Chose Auth0
Auth0 was just a lighter lift to get going. As mentioned previously, their documentation was robust, easy to read, and had exactly my use-case among many others. I recently read that Okta is acquiring Auth0 - this would have been a no-brainer for me if I was Okta. Congrats to …
Chose Auth0
Auth0 came highly recommended by a friend and former colleague. I trust his judgement tremendously. Thus we started looking at and experimenting with Auth0 first. As this was immediately successful (we had the first bit up-and-running in a single day) we did not really look …
Chose Auth0
We looked at Okta before they bought Auth0. Okta is more sophisticated in terms of enterprise solutions, but was out-of-date when it came to user and developer solutions.
Chose Auth0
I was not involved in the decision to use Auth0. However, I work with many clients who use Okta and Azure as their IdPs. Auth0's documentation is by far the best, but Okta's interface is easier to navigate.

We use Google as our IdP because we use Google for our inboxes, so it …
Chose Auth0
We've previously had our own in-house solution or used an external, specific OAuth provider. Both of these were fine on the surface, but they required a lot of overhead and maintenance work that we didn't want to deal with, as this is not our code business.
Chose Auth0
Auth0 is better positioned for online services such as ours. It has transparent and affordable pricing, exceptional developer experience, and a fantastic administration console. We did not evaluate the other systems, and may still end up one day, but for now, we're very happy …
Chose Auth0
Auth0 is extremely easy to use; it is also quite affordable. After reading some blogs, documentation, and reviews, it seems to me that the authentication, authorization, and security that it offers is also superior to Microsoft Azure Active Directory and The Okta Identity …
Chose Auth0
I chose Auth0 over Amazon Cognito for the simple reason that the Auth0 documentation is 1000 times better! I honestly could never figure out how to actually do anything useful with Cognito, but perhaps their docs have gotten better, I don't know. Auth0 had me up and running …
HID DigitalPersona
Chose HID DigitalPersona
I know its not a direct competitor but HID is better in all the sense its amazing because of its integration with Microsoft Azure AD. It has overall better functionality as it doesnt work on cloud premises it can also be used on premises. The best part is one can use mfa …
Chose HID DigitalPersona
We've been using HID DigitalPersona for so long that I honestly can't recall what other products we did investigated. We have been satisfied with the app for a very long time, therefore we don't see the need to explore other options.
Chose HID DigitalPersona
It has a greater advantage than Okta because it gives a variety of verification options and allows biometrics logging in, which is something the other software does not, in my suggestion.
Chose HID DigitalPersona
HID DigitalPersona is selected against them as it has a reliable and a great secured software which has a versatile access to other platforms as well which saves a lot software to be taken and HID DigitalPersona is a one stop solution to all problems it has everything a …
Chose HID DigitalPersona
Our use of HID DigitalPersona has been for long that I really can't remember what other products we looked at. We have happy with app for a very long time thus I don't see the need to look at other possibilities.
Chose HID DigitalPersona
overall HID was a better pick it had more features and was cheaper in comparison. its integration with Azure ad makes it super helpful.
Chose HID DigitalPersona
Not proper usage with AWS but HID has been really versatile it just works as we need to login to system has become really easy and fast because of it. The multi factor authorization gives you the freedom to chose from a variety of authentication methods such as biometric login, …
Chose HID DigitalPersona
In comaprison to okta its better suited as it has array of authentication methods and it also offers login via biometric which according to me is not present in the other software.
Chose HID DigitalPersona
HID is really superior because we can use it on any device. It also has MFA (Multi-factor authorization), which provides an extra layer of security.
Chose HID DigitalPersona
HID DigitalPersona is a better optionbecause of its many authentication factors,integration options, andcentralized management.
Chose HID DigitalPersona
They both are great and offer great features such as single sign on and top, but HID DigitalPersona is ahead of Ping identity because it offers Biometrics as well and it can also work in offline setting as well.
Chose HID DigitalPersona
Strong authentication, multifactor authentication, biometrics, and integration set HID DigitalPersona apart, making it an excellent option for a range of authentication requirements.
Chose HID DigitalPersona
I don't have excessive experience with One login, but it wasn't as feature rich as HID DigitalPersona. The best part about HID DigitalPersona is that it can be used in offline settings as well.
Chose HID DigitalPersona
HID serves all our purposes and is not that expensive its integration with microsoft active directory makes it super helpful. It is loaded with features that are not just for show off but actually works its a great software and we dont think any other software can match its …
Chose HID DigitalPersona
HID DigitalPersona is a great software from others as it provides a great security and trusted 2 factor authentication which helps in creating a system integrator with trust and ease of use it has been proved to be a great software by it's easy and accessible user interface …
Chose HID DigitalPersona
HID provides better integration option more authentication options and its easier to use. The integration which helps HID the most is Azure's active directory it makes HID better in all regards. It acts as a centralized system to protect all the resources and data of your …
Chose HID DigitalPersona
Okta Workflows (previously Azuqua) focuses on application integration and workflow automation while HID DigitalPersona stresses authentication security and compliance.
Chose HID DigitalPersona
The benefit of HID DigitalPersona is it uses a biometric method for authentication. It can be integrated with Azure which means it is more features reach and offers multiple factor authorization and SSO.
Chose HID DigitalPersona
A number of factors, including HID DigitalPersona's extensive range of authentication methods, easy integration with Microsoft Active Directory, support for a variety of use cases, robust compliance and security features, and affordable pricing or licensing models, may make it …
Chose HID DigitalPersona
We have used HID DigitalPersona for over 8 years and have been so satisfied with the product that we just haven't even looked because we like the product that much.
Chose HID DigitalPersona
We went the other direction. DigitalPersona was our initial implementation, but we have moved away from DigitalPersona and moved to a product called TecMFA. Our organization has implemented Okta as our application and Azure as our multifactor authentication platform, and …
Features
Auth0HID DigitalPersona
Identity Management
Comparison of Identity Management features of Product A and Product B
Auth0
8.6
Ratings
0% above category average
HID DigitalPersona
-
Ratings
ID-Management Access Control8.20 Ratings00 Ratings
ID Management Single-Sign On (SSO)8.50 Ratings00 Ratings
Multi-Factor Authentication8.50 Ratings00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Auth0HID DigitalPersona
Small Businesses

No answers on this topic

WatchGuard AuthPoint
WatchGuard AuthPoint
Score 9.1 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
OneLogin by One Identity
OneLogin by One Identity
Score 9.6 out of 10
Cisco Duo
Cisco Duo
Score 9.5 out of 10
Enterprises
OneLogin by One Identity
OneLogin by One Identity
Score 9.6 out of 10
Cisco Duo
Cisco Duo
Score 9.5 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Auth0HID DigitalPersona
Likelihood to Recommend
7.2
(0 ratings)
9.2
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
8.2
(0 ratings)
9.5
(0 ratings)
Usability
5.5
(0 ratings)
9.0
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
8.2
(0 ratings)
9.0
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
-
(0 ratings)
9.0
(0 ratings)
Configurability
6.4
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Ease of integration
-
(0 ratings)
7.3
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Auth0HID DigitalPersona
Likelihood to Recommend
Auth0 is very well suited for situations where a JSON web token can be used for authorizing APIs, websites, and mobile devices. It's especially useful if the JWT validation can happen at a gateway layer. It's especially useful if you only need to verify the user's email address or mobile number as the passwordless login is easy to implement.
Read full review
During the onboarding process, remote workers can enroll their fingerprints or create secure PINs. This eliminates the need for complicated passwords and enables them to safely access company resources and critical apps from remote locations. HID DigitalPersona's robust authentication techniques and access control features can assist you in adhering to data security laws.
Read full review
Pros
  • Overall we had very good experience with Auth0. It supports industry standard language or technology for integration. Very good performance.
  • It's nice to work with Auth0's APIs and they are flexible.
  • The management and configuration dashboard is useful and easy to deal with.
Read full review
  • Super fast to recognize fingerprint and authenticate .
  • Accurate with a wide area of fingerprint. Most windows laptops with built in fingerprint scanners only recognize a small area of print.
  • Units are inexpensive.
  • Quick and easy to install server software and client hardware.
  • When workstations were upgraded from Windows 8.1 to Windows 10 the software continued working flawlessly.
Read full review
Cons
  • Auth0 can be somewhat limiting if you want a lot of control over the design of your authentication flow. Custom branding can be done, but it may be limited depending on how you plan to integrate.
  • The Auth0 API documentation has proven confusing at times; a single API endpoint's behaviour will change based on inputs and configured settings (e.g. offline_access). Consequently fields that are advertised as being returned in a response might not be there or have different values if you miss a key detail and it can be difficult to debug when this happens. All information required is available in the documentation but requires some digging.
  • The toggle to switch tenants feels a bit odd, it works, but I've had a few instances where I didn't realize I was on a staging tenant looking for something that was on the production tenant. Not a big deal, just something to watch out for.
Read full review
  • Multiple domains - DigitalPersona struggles with multiple domains. Since the solution is licensed per domain, migrating users between domains can be troublesome to keep licensed. Additionally, migrating to a new domain removes the AD leaf objects that store all digital persona information, essentially wiping out and credentials or other stored information.
  • Password change - DigitalPersona can be confusing to update when a stored password for a website is updated. The password is entered, and then the user is redirected to the websites password change page. Users must then authenticate with a Digital persona credential again before being prompted by Digital Persona to update the password. If the user is allowed to change the password manually through the websites page, this will lead to what is stored in Digital Persona being out of sync with the new password, and eventually account lockouts.
  • Terminal Server - DigitalPersona has performance issues when utilized on a high-traffic terminal server. Often it causes big CPU spikes as well as hanging sessions upon disconnect.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
For our purposes, Auth0 is still one of the best valued RBAC platforms in the market.
Read full review
It is wonderful for multifactor authentication and gives us many options for what we use to authenticate. All of our users use it and it is engrained into our group policies and people would be very disappointed if it went away.
Read full review
Usability
- integration and ease of implementation - great over all product support specially for passkey biometric authentication -Auth0 is very reliable to use their API integration for security
verification. It provides best API to integrate our website and application
with Single Sign In option and two step verification option. Sales and technical teams are always there to provide support
Read full review
I think there are still fundamental enhancements needed to be added to the management consoles and I think there ought to be a Centralized, Windows Based "Thick" Management Application instead of individual utilities which vary from MMCs, Scripts, Wizards, etc.
Read full review
Support Rating
There isn't a clear method to get a hold of support when trouble arises if you're on their standard plan. You can file a support ticket and they generally are responsive. I've often been able to find similar questions to the questions I've had when it comes to support in their ticket history, however, some have been closed without a satisfactory conclusion for the original poster.
Read full review
Extremely poor; I've never encountered such. Professional Services completely dropped us for months. Crossmatch tech support seems like it has 3 techs tops! No response to emails, calls, the absolute worst! I will never recommend DP to anyone.
Read full review
Implementation Rating
No answers on this topic
Could use tools to audit license usage at a more granular level as to allow an administrator to free up licenses from users whom seldom use their biometrics to login.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Auth0 is non-evasive and does not require software download. It is user friendly, seamless, and doesn't require additional actions on the part of the user. IBM Trusteer is none of these things and is based on a technology stack that cannot scale in the same way as Auth0. We believe Auth0 provides a superior solution and is well suited for our own technology stack.
Read full review
We evaluated Cisco DUO but ultimately chose HID because of their support for biometrics. With DUO every user would have to have the authentication app on their personal phone and pull it out each time they had to log in. We definitely did not want this for our frontline staff as it would slow the process way down
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • Development time has been allocated to the more core parts of our business.
  • We are confident in the security of our user's accounts and their data.
  • Auth0's login flows are customizable which means that we don't have to worry about users being confused when logging in/changing their passwords, and we didn't event have to spend that much time configuring this. (Full in-house development for login could take weeks to get right.)
Read full review
  • Provides a quick one finger authentication\log-on.
  • Logging onto a machine that is used by several other users, such as in retail is no problem because the DigitalPersona software does a switch user function instead of logging out the other user.
  • One negative that was apparent immediately after installing the DigitalPersona software was that users very easily forgot their Windows passwords because of the one finger log-on.
Read full review
ScreenShots

Auth0 Screenshots

Screenshot of multi-factor authentication with Auth0Screenshot of Auth0's user interface tools. These help administrators manage user identities including password resets, creating and provisioning, blocking and deleting users.Screenshot of a view of the customer's digital experience; this includes smart recommendations based on previous behavior, an experience tailored specifically to their mobile device, and easy discovery of travel options.Screenshot of the Auth0 Identity Access Management platform, built on AWS. It is designed to deliver a universal authentication and authorization as a service for web, mobile and legacy applications.to 7000+ customers worldwide.Screenshot of Auth0’s Adaptive MFA, which is based on various types of behavioral signals, meaning the MFA step is only presented when deemed risky. This preserves the experience for the majority of users, while maintaining a strong security posture.