Autodesk BIM Collaborate Pro vs. Trimble ProjectSight

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Autodesk BIM Collaborate Pro
Score 8.3 out of 10
N/A
Autodesk BIM Collaborate Pro (formerly BIM360) is a construction software for project managers, site managers, and Building Information Modelling (BIM) managers. It is designed to connect the office and site components of construction, providing cloud-based access to plans and models.
$480
per user/per year
Trimble ProjectSight
Score 9.6 out of 10
N/A
Trimble ProjectSight, replacing the former Prolog, is a construction project management software solution for contractors and other AEC firms, providing a complete system of record for managing project information, from the field to the back office. Designed by construction professionals for construction professionals, ProjectSight is built for project managers accountable for construction costs, scope and schedules, and for project teams responsible for the successful delivery of projects.…N/A
Pricing
Autodesk BIM Collaborate ProTrimble ProjectSight
Editions & Modules
Autodesk Bim 360
$480.00
per user/per year
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Autodesk BIM Collaborate ProTrimble ProjectSight
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Autodesk BIM Collaborate ProTrimble ProjectSight
Considered Both Products
Autodesk BIM Collaborate Pro
Chose Autodesk BIM Collaborate Pro
BIM360 compared to Prolog is comparing apples and oranges. We used these programs to do things the other could not. We used Prolog to handle bids, budget and change orders. While BIM360 we thought was not set up to easily do those options so we used BIM for drawings, …
Trimble ProjectSight

No answer on this topic

Features
Autodesk BIM Collaborate ProTrimble ProjectSight
Asset Management
Comparison of Asset Management features of Product A and Product B
Autodesk BIM Collaborate Pro
6.0
Ratings
18% below category average
Trimble ProjectSight
-
Ratings
Tracking of all physical assets6.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Reporting & Analytics
Comparison of Reporting & Analytics features of Product A and Product B
Autodesk BIM Collaborate Pro
6.2
Ratings
21% below category average
Trimble ProjectSight
10.0
Ratings
27% above category average
Dashboards4.30 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Standard reports6.30 Ratings00 Ratings
Custom reports7.10 Ratings00 Ratings
Data exportability7.10 Ratings00 Ratings
Construction Project & Field Management
Comparison of Construction Project & Field Management features of Product A and Product B
Autodesk BIM Collaborate Pro
6.8
Ratings
10% below category average
Trimble ProjectSight
5.0
Ratings
41% below category average
Plan distribution & viewing9.90 Ratings6.10 Ratings
Plan markups & sharing10.00 Ratings6.10 Ratings
Issue tracking & punchlists8.20 Ratings6.10 Ratings
Photo documentation5.30 Ratings6.10 Ratings
Jobsite reports4.40 Ratings4.00 Ratings
Document sharing10.00 Ratings3.00 Ratings
RFI tools4.30 Ratings5.60 Ratings
Collaboration & approvals9.80 Ratings2.00 Ratings
As-built drawings4.40 Ratings6.00 Ratings
Mobile app3.00 Ratings4.00 Ratings
Submittal design and management6.30 Ratings6.10 Ratings
Checklists4.40 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Meeting Minutes9.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Specifications5.30 Ratings00 Ratings
Change orders8.00 Ratings1.00 Ratings
Estimating
Comparison of Estimating features of Product A and Product B
Autodesk BIM Collaborate Pro
4.3
Ratings
60% below category average
Trimble ProjectSight
2.0
Ratings
120% below category average
Takeoff tools4.40 Ratings00 Ratings
Job costing3.50 Ratings00 Ratings
Cost databases8.00 Ratings2.00 Ratings
Cost calculator2.50 Ratings2.00 Ratings
Bid creation3.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Autodesk BIM Collaborate ProTrimble ProjectSight
Small Businesses
FollowUp CRM
FollowUp CRM
Score 10.0 out of 10
FollowUp CRM
FollowUp CRM
Score 10.0 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
InEight
InEight
Score 8.3 out of 10
InEight
InEight
Score 8.3 out of 10
Enterprises
InEight
InEight
Score 8.3 out of 10
InEight
InEight
Score 8.3 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Autodesk BIM Collaborate ProTrimble ProjectSight
Likelihood to Recommend
9.9
(0 ratings)
5.5
(0 ratings)
Usability
10.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
6.9
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Autodesk BIM Collaborate ProTrimble ProjectSight
Likelihood to Recommend
It is very efficient to set up projects using configurable templates for files, issues, and roles. Data management is easy to be understood by many users. As we have multiple users that are located in different areas in the world, it allows managing multi-discipline teams in only one environment. Clash analysis on shared models saves us time too.
Read full review
  • Well suited: distributing information and collecting and keeping data
  • Less suited: quickly trying to process something or get info to subs
Read full review
Pros
  • Live updates between design teams. This keeps the team up to date for quicker design and frees up personnel from having to do file transfers.
  • The cloud-based platform gives your company a little bit of a break on computer requirements.
  • Allows multiple offices and/or cloud-based consultants to collaborate on a design as if they are one office or one company.
Read full review
  • Keeps log of most recent CD documents
  • Allows marking up of PDFs
  • Notifies you if you have an outstanding item
Read full review
Cons
  • Bim360 is extremely unintuitive and frequently confusing to end users.
  • There are multiple avenues of sharing and collaboration for models and information. The advantages/disadvantages of each and how to perform even the most basic of tasks requires extensive training and mentoring for even the most advanced of users.
  • There are many enormous limitations and constraints to BIM 360 that are not immediately obvious and even contrary to published marketing materials and even product naming.
  • Development cycles of the product are seemingly monthly, but incredibly minor. This makes the desperately-needed and glaringly obvious massive usability, capability, and performance improvements into deal-breakers and hair pulling events. Change cannot come fast enough.
  • There are no integrations into Microsoft's Azure AD SSO or other 3rd party SSOs available for SMBs. This makes the provided MFA a huge headache for all SMBs.
  • There are no integrations into the Microsoft 365 ecosystem for SharePoint/OneDrive or Outlook. This is desperately needed for most organizations using Bim360.
Read full review
  • A lot of steps, tad confusing
  • Very in-depth, not necessarily a con, but requires a lot of information
Read full review
Usability
It's not very difficult to use for majority of all our users. We really like storing and managing all our project data in one location so users have only one option to access the requested information. Managing our architectural engineering projects with two workflows in one system is really a good asset
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
AutoDesk support is slow and if you are not an enterprise customer they will likely tell you to go to forums and post for help pushing the support on the high-level end-users (some of which are AutoDesk employees). I haven't actually had issues requiring support with docs altough there are some features I wish it had
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
Personally I prefer Procore for reviewing submittals and other documentation for LEED purposes only because that platform holds more of the information we are looking for like drawings as well, all in one place. Newforma has been used from time to time, but Autodesk is preffered to that because of its straightforward nature. Overall, we use the platform that our projects are already using, but they do make a small difference in the time and effectiveness of which we are able to do our job as consultants.
Read full review
I have only used Procore otherwise, and from what I remember Procore does not have as many features in terms of keeping track of CD documents, and organizing RFI's like Trimble does. I think overall Trimble ProjectSight (Prolog) is a better product, and if it was up to me I would pick Trimble ProjectSight (Prolog) over Procore.
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • Well, I would say it's helpful for me to exchange different models with different specifications.
  • Number of people can work and also characterized models based on its modelling.
  • Even if a number of people are working, none of the models get disturbed, which is one of the most important points of BIM.
Read full review
  • did not purchase at this time. Looking for something better suited to our needs
Read full review
ScreenShots