Autodesk Inventor vs. Graebert ARES
| Product | Rating | Most Used By | Product Summary | Starting Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
 Autodesk Inventor | Score8 out of 10 | N/A | Autodesk Inventor 3D CAD software offers professional-grade 3D mechanical design, documentation, and product simulation tools. These blend parametric, direct, freeform, and rules-based design capabilities. Inventor includes integrated tools for sheet metal, frame design, tube and pipe, cable & harness, presentations, rendering, simulation, and machine design. It also features TrustedDWG® compatibility and Model-Based Definition capabilities for embedding manufacturing information directly in… | $300 12 days over 1 year via Flex pricing 100 tokens |
 ARES | Score9 out of 10 | N/A | Graebert headquartered in Berlin offers the ARES suite of CAD applications. The product portfolio is anchored by the ARES “Trinity” of CAD Software for DWG-editing including ARES Commander for Windows, macOS and Linux computers, ARES Touch for Android and iOS smartphones and tablets and ARES Kudo, a full browser-based solution for DWG-editing in the Cloud. Graebert’s innovative approach is to combine these 3 solutions into a single ecosystem and subscription. | N/A |
| Autodesk Inventor | ARES | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Editions & Modules |
| No answers on this topic | ||||||||||||||
| Offerings |
| |||||||||||||||
| Entry-level Setup Fee | No setup fee | No setup fee | ||||||||||||||
| Additional Details | Also available for limited use through tokens on a Flex plan. | — | ||||||||||||||
| More Pricing Information | ||||||||||||||||
| Autodesk Inventor | ARES | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Computer-Aided Design Software |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Autodesk Inventor | ARES | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend | 8.0 | - |
| Likelihood to Renew | 9.2 | - |
| Usability | 10.0 | - |
| Support Rating | 8.1 | - |
| In-Person Training | 6.0 | - |
| Implementation Rating | 10.0 | - |
| Configurability | 10.0 | - |